On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:54:33 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


And Karl is still under a shadow, awaiting lockup.

He's not alone. Cheney looks probable.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:54:33 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


And Karl is still under a shadow, awaiting lockup.

He's not alone. Cheney looks probable.

You guys never quit wishing. What the heck could he charge Cheney with?
Not perjury. Cheney didn't testify. And since Fitzgerald has admitted that
there was no crime committed in the 'outing' of Plame, what could the charge
be? Being Republican?

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:35:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


He's not alone. Cheney looks probable.

You guys never quit wishing. What the heck could he charge Cheney with?
Not perjury. Cheney didn't testify. And since Fitzgerald has admitted
that there was no crime committed in the 'outing' of Plame, what could the
charge be? Being Republican?

Uh, your sources must be better informed than mine. I hadn't heard that
Fitzgerald admitted there was no crime in the outing of Plame. I have
heard that there is a very good chance Cheney will be indicted on
conspiracy charges. Other potential charges include leaking of classified
material, and civil rights charges, vis a vis damaging Wilson's career.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:35:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


He's not alone. Cheney looks probable.

You guys never quit wishing. What the heck could he charge Cheney with?
Not perjury. Cheney didn't testify. And since Fitzgerald has admitted
that there was no crime committed in the 'outing' of Plame, what could
the
charge be? Being Republican?

Uh, your sources must be better informed than mine. I hadn't heard that
Fitzgerald admitted there was no crime in the outing of Plame.

You're the master of google. He's admitted as such. Go look for it.


I have
heard that there is a very good chance Cheney will be indicted on
conspiracy charges. Other potential charges include leaking of classified
material,


The "leaking" wasn't a leak if it comes at the directive of the POTUS. And
Libby's attorneys already said that the directive to release the info came
from "the top".


and civil rights charges, vis a vis damaging Wilson's career.


Wilson's career? What, precisely, was "Wilson' career" at the time that his
wife arranged for him to go to Niger?

Wilson lied to the news media when he said that Cheney's office sent him.
If his career was "damaged", it was damaged by his own transgressions.

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:57:36 +0000, NOYB wrote:


The "leaking" wasn't a leak if it comes at the directive of the POTUS.
And Libby's attorneys already said that the directive to release the info
came from "the top".

Geez, who are we to believe? Libby's attorneys or the President?

"I don't know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified
information. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know
it, and we'll take the appropriate action." [Bush Remarks: Chicago,
Illinois, 9/30/03]

thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:35:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


He's not alone. Cheney looks probable.
You guys never quit wishing. What the heck could he charge Cheney with?
Not perjury. Cheney didn't testify. And since Fitzgerald has admitted
that there was no crime committed in the 'outing' of Plame, what could the
charge be? Being Republican?

Uh, your sources must be better informed than mine. I hadn't heard that
Fitzgerald admitted there was no crime in the outing of Plame. I have
heard that there is a very good chance Cheney will be indicted on
conspiracy charges. Other potential charges include leaking of classified
material, and civil rights charges, vis a vis damaging Wilson's career.

What Conspiracy?