Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: I think you may be jumping the gun as we do not know where he plans to boat. For all we know it could be an inland lake and purchasing flares meeting the SOLAS standard is overkill. It's a good idea gear up for the worst possible conditions one might encounter, rather than the typical conditions "normally" encountered. Good flares stow just as easily as the little kiddie sparklers, don't cost much more, and on a very dark night (where fog and or heavy rain could be a factor, even not that far offshore) they just might make all the difference. An acquaintance of mine spent a long night on an overturned hull near Vancouver Island. He had both SOLAS and "USCG approved" flares. He failed to attract the attention of a nearby fishing boat with either- but his experience comparing the effects of the SOLAS with the USCG approved units has made him an enthusiastic crusader for SOLAS. He says he will never have another merely "USCG approved" flare on any boat he owns. "An acquaintance of mine spent a long night on an overturned hull near Vancouver Island. He had both SOLAS and "USCG approved" flares. He failed to attract the attention of a *nearby* fishing boat with either..." Not too compelling of a story on why to get SOLAS standard flares. But I guess carrying a couple could not hurt. That does not dismiss the fact that SOLAS flares are needed by everyone in every boating environment. We have no idea where and how RG plans to boat. He may not need suspenders and a belt Chuck. ;-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat Safety - and thread arguments | Cruising | |||
Licensing alternative | Cruising | |||
Boulevard Cars Lack Active Safety Features | ASA |