| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Our next president
|
Our next president
|
Our next president
|
Our next president
|
Our next president
"RCE" wrote in message
... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" Doug wrote in message ... http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!!! Oh boy. Jimmy is playing with computers again. Jimmy? RCE Compare the headers in the two messages which are supposedly from me. |
Our next president
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" Doug wrote in message ... http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!!! Oh boy. Jimmy is playing with computers again. Jimmy? RCE Compare the headers in the two messages which are supposedly from me. If you are in any way inferring that I was involved, I was not. I was with a customer most of the morning and just got back. Try again Doug. |
Our next president
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" Doug wrote in message ... http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!!! Oh boy. Jimmy is playing with computers again. Jimmy? RCE Compare the headers in the two messages which are supposedly from me. That should be a crime. RCE |
Our next president
|
Our next president
Apologies to previous poster. I thought he was the annoying pest
|
Our next president
"Frank" wrote in message oups.com... Apologies to previous poster. I thought he was the annoying pest Que? |
Our next president
Doug Kanter wrote:
http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!!! My monitor cracked when I displayed that page. |
Our next president
Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!!! This one's better.... http://conservativecrust.com/archive...Plantation.jpg |
Our next president
Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick |
Our next president
wrote in message
oups.com... Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. Considering the morons who were impressed by the Swift Boat lies, all they'd need to do to sink Hillary would be run around yelling about how she never served in Vietnam. |
Our next president
On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, "
wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:17:44 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. Considering the morons who were impressed by the Swift Boat lies, all they'd need to do to sink Hillary would be run around yelling about how she never served in Vietnam. See previous response to Chuck. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. John H You know what's strange, though? Kerry's no idiot. Why would he concoct a story, knowing full well that there were people still around who would contradict it? It's so obvious. |
Our next president
You are right.......Kerry is not an idiot, especially considering his
accomplishments in life. Yet folks call Bush an idiot despite the fact that he had better grades in college than Kerry and attained the position of POTUS for 2 terms. Go figure. :-) |
Our next president
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:10:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. John H You know what's strange, though? Kerry's no idiot. Why would he concoct a story, knowing full well that there were people still around who would contradict it? It's so obvious. Who knows? Pride? Ego? Selfish? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. This isn't about politics. It's about the truth. For the most part, the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth" didn't lie. They did, however, misrepresent, spin wildly, and omit pertinent facts when it suited them. The end result was less than the whole truth, regarding a variety of incidents involving Kerry. The lying -- and there was plenty of it -- was by-and-large done by their followers, and others who didn't like Kerry . . . . those people didn't seem to go any further than reading Unfit for Command, and then assumed all they needed to know was in that book. Doug Reese 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
We need another Michael Moore movie! You know what's terribly sad? The fact that in today's society we now differentiate between "misrepresenting, spinning wildly, and omitting pertinent facts" and actual lying. No judgement on you as an individual intended- just a general social observation. The lying -- and there was plenty of it -- was by-and-large done by their followers, and others who didn't like Kerry . . . . those people didn't seem to go any further than reading Unfit for Command, and then assumed all they needed to know was in that book. Doug Reese 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
wrote: wrote: JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. This isn't about politics. It's about the truth. For the most part, the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth" didn't lie. They did, however, misrepresent, spin wildly, and omit pertinent facts when it suited them. The end result was less than the whole truth, regarding a variety of incidents involving Kerry. You know what's terribly sad? The fact that in today's society we now differentiate between "misrepresenting, spinning wildly, and omitting pertinent facts" and actual lying. No judgement on you as an individual intended- just a general social observation. Point taken. The reason I differentiate is because if I don't, I get called on it. "Show me one lie" is what they have said. Bottom line is that the book is a dishonest, shameful smear of Kerry, and those who were close to him. It avoids the truth at every turn. And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. Doug Reese The lying -- and there was plenty of it -- was by-and-large done by their followers, and others who didn't like Kerry . . . . those people didn't seem to go any further than reading Unfit for Command, and then assumed all they needed to know was in that book. Doug Reese 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
On 26 Apr 2006 17:26:00 -0700, "
wrote: wrote: JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. This isn't about politics. It's about the truth. For the most part, the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth" didn't lie. They did, however, misrepresent, spin wildly, and omit pertinent facts when it suited them. The end result was less than the whole truth, regarding a variety of incidents involving Kerry. You know what's terribly sad? The fact that in today's society we now differentiate between "misrepresenting, spinning wildly, and omitting pertinent facts" and actual lying. They didn't do that either. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
On 26 Apr 2006 18:10:27 -0700, wrote:
wrote: wrote: JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. This isn't about politics. It's about the truth. For the most part, the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth" didn't lie. They did, however, misrepresent, spin wildly, and omit pertinent facts when it suited them. The end result was less than the whole truth, regarding a variety of incidents involving Kerry. You know what's terribly sad? The fact that in today's society we now differentiate between "misrepresenting, spinning wildly, and omitting pertinent facts" and actual lying. No judgement on you as an individual intended- just a general social observation. Point taken. The reason I differentiate is because if I don't, I get called on it. "Show me one lie" is what they have said. Bottom line is that the book is a dishonest, shameful smear of Kerry, and those who were close to him. It avoids the truth at every turn. And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. In my 'VN vet' opinion, Kerry and Fonda can stand on the same pedestal. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message
... And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. In my 'VN vet' opinion, Kerry and Fonda can stand on the same pedestal. John H That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. |
Our next president
JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 17:26:00 -0700, " wrote: wrote: JohnH wrote: On 26 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700, " wrote: Harry Krause wrote: wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...21604-1969.jpg YEA!!!!!!!!!! Hillary is fine by me, but I think Mark Warner of Virginia will be the nominee, and the next president Hillary will never be POTUS. Her job right now is to look lke she *might* run and draw all the acrimonious sneers, jeers, and vicious hate speech away from the real prospects. Following the incredible success of the Swift Boat lies in 2004, the groundwork is already being laid for a re-run of that tactic should she contend for POTUS in '08. It's one heck of a heavy hammer for the RW- how does anybody prove they're *not* gay? You have to believe that maybe the sister of the doctor who claimed he treated Kerry's Purple Heart wounds (but whose name appears nowhere in the Navy medical records) will step forward and claim that she slept with Hillary at Wellesley. By the time the story is debunked, (or not?), the damage will have been done. Even if she were the best candidate, (she's not), she cannot be elected in the current political and social climate. http://www.newyorker.com/talk/conten...a_talk_remnick The Swift Boat folks weren't lying. Enough politics for today. This isn't about politics. It's about the truth. For the most part, the Swift Boat Veterans for "truth" didn't lie. They did, however, misrepresent, spin wildly, and omit pertinent facts when it suited them. The end result was less than the whole truth, regarding a variety of incidents involving Kerry. You know what's terribly sad? The fact that in today's society we now differentiate between "misrepresenting, spinning wildly, and omitting pertinent facts" and actual lying. They didn't do that either. They did it left and right, John, they did it left and right. Not an opinion, but a matter of fact. That's if you care about facts . .. . . Doug Reese 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:04:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. In my 'VN vet' opinion, Kerry and Fonda can stand on the same pedestal. John H That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:04:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. In my 'VN vet' opinion, Kerry and Fonda can stand on the same pedestal. John H That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:57:45 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:04:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... And the wedge that has been driven between many VN vets by a few spiteful men, is, well, pititful. . . . just pitiful. In my 'VN vet' opinion, Kerry and Fonda can stand on the same pedestal. John H That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message
... That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message m... That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg John H If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:04:57 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message om... That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North Vietnamese weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up with the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi. You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me", you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN. I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war. John H Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg John H If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't. Now go make a donation and put me in the poor house. I'll match it, as per my previous post. (in other words, I'll only match up to $3676!) http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message
... Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg John H If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't. Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men, since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which, in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy. |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:15:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct? Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more appropriate than 'met'. John H I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from? http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm John H OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category? http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg John H If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't. Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men, since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which, in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy. As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the group! Supplied who with what? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Our next president
"JohnH" wrote in message
... If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't. Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men, since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which, in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy. As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the group! Well, what is the "Guilty Just Like Jane" minimum distance? Is it 2 rows away? Or, 20 feet, or WHAT? What if, instead of Kerry being right behind her, it was just some walkin' around slob like the rest of us, who never became famous? Would that person be as guilty as Jane? Supplied who with what? For some reason, I had the idea you were connected with supplies in VN. Handing out stuff. |
Our next president
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:06:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the same way? Would the picture have the same meaning? That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't. Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men, since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which, in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy. As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the group! Well, what is the "Guilty Just Like Jane" minimum distance? Is it 2 rows away? Or, 20 feet, or WHAT? What if, instead of Kerry being right behind her, it was just some walkin' around slob like the rest of us, who never became famous? Would that person be as guilty as Jane? Supplied who with what? For some reason, I had the idea you were connected with supplies in VN. Handing out stuff. Nope, Combat Engineer. The only time I handed out stuff was on a MEDCAP (medical civic action patrol) or DENTCAP. Then it was either medical or dental supplies. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com