BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Our next president (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/69078-our-next-president.html)

Doug Kanter April 27th 06 08:30 PM

Our next president
 
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H


Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H


I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



JohnH April 27th 06 08:35 PM

Our next president
 
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say "Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category. The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H


I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Doug Kanter April 27th 06 08:38 PM

Our next president
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say
"Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to
me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in
VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H


I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H


OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?



JohnH April 27th 06 08:57 PM

Our next president
 
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say
"Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to
me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in
VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H

I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H


OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?


http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg

--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Doug Kanter April 27th 06 09:04 PM

Our next president
 
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
m...

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have
very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came
up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say
"Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to
me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in
VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H

I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H


OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?


http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg

John H



If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?



JohnH April 27th 06 09:13 PM

Our next president
 
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:04:57 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:38:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
om...

That "met with the enemy" idea is kinda weird, John. The North
Vietnamese
weren't our enemy until a bunch of suits (who you'd probably have
very
little respect for, and who quietly vanished from public life) came
up
with
the domino theory. If I move next store to you, and stop by & say
"Hi.
You're my enemy, although I know you've done absolutely nothing to
me",
you'd think I was out of my mind. But, that's exactly what we did in
VN.


I've said nothing about agreeing or disagreeing with the VN war.
John H

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H

I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H

OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?


http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg

John H



If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?


That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my
opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have
gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't.

Now go make a donation and put me in the poor house. I'll match it, as per
my previous post. (in other words, I'll only match up to $3676!)

http://www.active.com/donate/varace4cure/JohnHerring
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Doug Kanter April 27th 06 09:15 PM

Our next president
 
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same
category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H

I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H

OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?


http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg

John H



If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?


That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my
opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have
gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't.


Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as
Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men,
since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which,
in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy.



JohnH April 27th 06 10:56 PM

Our next president
 
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:15:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .

Well, you said you consider Kerry & Fonda to be in the same
category.
The
standard reason we hear is that Fonda met with the enemy. Is that
correct?


Perhaps 'pretended to shoot down American aircraft' would be more
appropriate than 'met'.
John H

I hadn't heard THAT one. Where'd that come from?



http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm
John H

OK. Now, how does that put Kerry in the same category?


http://images.washtimes.com/photos/f...52011-3111.jpg

John H


If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?


That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that - my
opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could have
gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't.


Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as
Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men,
since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them, which,
in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy.


As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the
group!

Supplied who with what?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

Doug Kanter April 27th 06 11:06 PM

Our next president
 
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel
the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?


That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that -
my
opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could
have
gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't.


Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as
Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men,
since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them,
which,
in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy.


As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the
group!


Well, what is the "Guilty Just Like Jane" minimum distance? Is it 2 rows
away? Or, 20 feet, or WHAT? What if, instead of Kerry being right behind
her, it was just some walkin' around slob like the rest of us, who never
became famous? Would that person be as guilty as Jane?



Supplied who with what?


For some reason, I had the idea you were connected with supplies in VN.
Handing out stuff.



JohnH April 28th 06 12:27 AM

Our next president
 
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:06:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .

If there were 5 people sitting between Kerry and Fonda, would you feel
the
same way? Would the picture have the same meaning?


That picture was just an example. My opinions of Kerry are just that -
my
opinions. I wish the Democrats had nominated someone else. They could
have
gotten my vote. But they didn't. So, they didn't.

Well, if his presence in the crowd means he's guilty of the same things as
Jane, then by your logic, you are as guilty as William Calley and his men,
since you were in the same country. You may have even supplied them,
which,
in the eyes of the law HERE would mean conspiracy.


As a matter of fact, I've been accused of like things right here on the
group!


Well, what is the "Guilty Just Like Jane" minimum distance? Is it 2 rows
away? Or, 20 feet, or WHAT? What if, instead of Kerry being right behind
her, it was just some walkin' around slob like the rest of us, who never
became famous? Would that person be as guilty as Jane?



Supplied who with what?


For some reason, I had the idea you were connected with supplies in VN.
Handing out stuff.


Nope, Combat Engineer. The only time I handed out stuff was on a MEDCAP
(medical civic action patrol) or DENTCAP. Then it was either medical or
dental supplies.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com