Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 18th 06, 06:02 AM posted to rec.boats
 
Posts: n/a
Default Speed and Fuel Consumption Curve

Just finished a *long* article about a very nice new boat.

Here's an interesting study in fuel efficiency from last Friday's test
run.

50-foot boat, 50,000 pound displacement when fully laden. (We ran the
test light ship),
525 HP single John Deere 6125AFM. 40X 32 prop.


700 rpm. 5.5 knots, 1.4 gph. (better than 3 nmpg)

1050 rpm. 8 knots, 3.5 gph. (still better than 2 nmpg)

1200 rpm. 8.7 knots, 5 gph.

NOTE: Fuel consumption increased roughly 40 percent between 8 knots and
8.7 knots, accomplishing less than a 10% increase in SOG.

********
1375 rpm. 9 knots, 7.4 gph

Note: Fuel consumption increased roughly 50% to achieve about a 4-5%
increase in SOG

******
1500 rpm. 10.2 knots, 10 gph (roughly 1 nmpg)

Note: Fuel consuption about 35-40% higher than at 1375 rpm, but better
than a 10% increase in SOG

******

1700 rpm, 11 knots, 14 gph.

Note: once again about a 40% increase in fuel burn to realize less than
a 10% increase in speed.

**********

2150 rpm, WOT, 14.6 knots, 27 gph,

Note: Almost 100% increase in fuel consumption from a 1700 rpm cruise,
but only about a 33% increase in SOG


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 18th 06, 08:18 PM posted to rec.boats
 
Posts: n/a
Default Speed and Fuel Consumption Curve


wrote:
Just finished a *long* article about a very nice new boat.

Here's an interesting study in fuel efficiency from last Friday's test
run.

50-foot boat, 50,000 pound displacement when fully laden. (We ran the
test light ship),
525 HP single John Deere 6125AFM. 40X 32 prop.


700 rpm. 5.5 knots, 1.4 gph. (better than 3 nmpg)

1050 rpm. 8 knots, 3.5 gph. (still better than 2 nmpg)

1200 rpm. 8.7 knots, 5 gph.

NOTE: Fuel consumption increased roughly 40 percent between 8 knots and
8.7 knots, accomplishing less than a 10% increase in SOG.

********
1375 rpm. 9 knots, 7.4 gph

Note: Fuel consumption increased roughly 50% to achieve about a 4-5%
increase in SOG

******
1500 rpm. 10.2 knots, 10 gph (roughly 1 nmpg)

Note: Fuel consuption about 35-40% higher than at 1375 rpm, but better
than a 10% increase in SOG

******

1700 rpm, 11 knots, 14 gph.

Note: once again about a 40% increase in fuel burn to realize less than
a 10% increase in speed.

**********

2150 rpm, WOT, 14.6 knots, 27 gph,

Note: Almost 100% increase in fuel consumption from a 1700 rpm cruise,
but only about a 33% increase in SOG



thats some pretty interesting findings, Chuck

My brother wonders why I don't max. out my little 4 cyl. Chris Craft. I
usually run it at 31-3200 RPM Plane speed +. Instead of WFO at
4-4200.

For the wear and tear, and fuel consumption, you really don't gain a
whole lot. The performance doesn't outweigh the benefit of over all
economy.

Tim

  #3   Report Post  
Old April 19th 06, 03:37 AM posted to rec.boats
Jim Donohue
 
Posts: n/a
Default Speed and Fuel Consumption Curve


wrote in message
oups.com...
Just finished a *long* article about a very nice new boat.

Here's an interesting study in fuel efficiency from last Friday's test
run.

50-foot boat, 50,000 pound displacement when fully laden. (We ran the
test light ship),
525 HP single John Deere 6125AFM. 40X 32 prop.


700 rpm. 5.5 knots, 1.4 gph. (better than 3 nmpg)

1050 rpm. 8 knots, 3.5 gph. (still better than 2 nmpg)

1200 rpm. 8.7 knots, 5 gph.

NOTE: Fuel consumption increased roughly 40 percent between 8 knots and
8.7 knots, accomplishing less than a 10% increase in SOG.

********
1375 rpm. 9 knots, 7.4 gph

Note: Fuel consumption increased roughly 50% to achieve about a 4-5%
increase in SOG

******
1500 rpm. 10.2 knots, 10 gph (roughly 1 nmpg)

Note: Fuel consuption about 35-40% higher than at 1375 rpm, but better
than a 10% increase in SOG

******

1700 rpm, 11 knots, 14 gph.

Note: once again about a 40% increase in fuel burn to realize less than
a 10% increase in speed.

**********

2150 rpm, WOT, 14.6 knots, 27 gph,

Note: Almost 100% increase in fuel consumption from a 1700 rpm cruise,
but only about a 33% increase in SOG

Almost a perfect coast boat. You poke along mostly in the low range from
port to port...but when you finally hit the ugly parts you push to the
upper. Says you can basically avoid overnights.

My wife would love it...what does it have for stabs?



  #4   Report Post  
Old April 19th 06, 03:52 AM posted to rec.boats
[email protected]
 
Posts: n/a
Default Speed and Fuel Consumption Curve


Jim Donohue wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Just finished a *long* article about a very nice new boat.

Here's an interesting study in fuel efficiency from last Friday's test
run.

50-foot boat, 50,000 pound displacement when fully laden. (We ran the
test light ship),
525 HP single John Deere 6125AFM. 40X 32 prop.


700 rpm. 5.5 knots, 1.4 gph. (better than 3 nmpg)

1050 rpm. 8 knots, 3.5 gph. (still better than 2 nmpg)

1200 rpm. 8.7 knots, 5 gph.

NOTE: Fuel consumption increased roughly 40 percent between 8 knots and
8.7 knots, accomplishing less than a 10% increase in SOG.

********
1375 rpm. 9 knots, 7.4 gph

Note: Fuel consumption increased roughly 50% to achieve about a 4-5%
increase in SOG

******
1500 rpm. 10.2 knots, 10 gph (roughly 1 nmpg)

Note: Fuel consuption about 35-40% higher than at 1375 rpm, but better
than a 10% increase in SOG

******

1700 rpm, 11 knots, 14 gph.

Note: once again about a 40% increase in fuel burn to realize less than
a 10% increase in speed.

**********

2150 rpm, WOT, 14.6 knots, 27 gph,

Note: Almost 100% increase in fuel consumption from a 1700 rpm cruise,
but only about a 33% increase in SOG

Almost a perfect coast boat. You poke along mostly in the low range from
port to port...but when you finally hit the ugly parts you push to the
upper. Says you can basically avoid overnights.

My wife would love it...what does it have for stabs?


This particular vessel wasn't rigged with stabilizers, but the mounting
pads were molded at the factory for easy retrofit. For inland water
usage, or even primary use in the Inside Passage, I would probably take
a "wait and see" attitude for a season or so before adding stabilizers.
For extended offshore coastal cruising, where you often deal with a lot
of beam seas on the west coast, I'd probably add some WESMAR's right
away.

I'll post the review later this evening. It's about 2900 words, so it
will take a while to slog through if you want to know more about the
boat.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(non-political) comments on fuel economy and technology [email protected] General 28 February 5th 06 10:22 PM
Grist for the discussion mill....(long)... [email protected] General 3 January 24th 06 04:17 AM
So where is...................... *JimH* General 186 November 28th 05 02:29 PM
Help with fuel consumption? Bill Kiene General 4 November 11th 05 04:44 PM
Gas Hog Cars, same phenomenon as boats [email protected] General 19 November 10th 05 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017