Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

Oh boy.

I think it's best to just let your last message sit in the water
like
chopped fish in a minnow trap, and see what it attracts.


Translation: "I cannot offer up any logic to counter the points made,
so
I'll just bow out gracefully".


Dave



Translation: You are willing to play Russian roulette with the health of
your children and grandchildren so a handful of corporations don't have
to
suffer a few years of economic hardship. Before patriotism, before faith
to
a deity, before anything else, your responsibility as a father is the
most
important thing on earth. By shirking that responsibility, you become
the
lowest form of garbage imaginable.


And you still haven't answered the basic question of just how much you
are willing to give up to achieve your utopian environment.

My concern for economic hardship has nothing to do with corporations
(although it would fit your agenda to believe that), but rather how the
increased costs will be passed on to the people, many of whom will not
be able to afford it.

Dave

You would give up the health of your children because you are wedded to the
policies of your president, who just gave a free gift to electric utilities.
You are the lowest form of garbage imaginable. Family values require that
you put your children first, and a complete stranger much further down on
the list.


And you STILL refuse to answer my question, instead attempting to throw
ad-hominem comments at me. How much are YOU willing to give up to
achieve your ideal environment Doug?

Dave