Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred Dehl" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in : "Fred Dehl" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in : "Fred Dehl" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in : "Fred Dehl" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in news ![]() I think you're assuming buyers are always stupid. What is SUV buyers were asked this question: "If you can have every single feature and benefit you asked for, but get 23mpg instead of 14mpg, would that interest you?" How do you suppose some buyers would react to that? At $2.50 a gallon, it will cost $5,434 in gas to drive the 23mpg vehicle 50,000 miles. It will cost $8,928 to drive the 17mpg vehicle the same. That's a savings of less than $3,500, far less than the premium for the privilege of driving the higher-mpg vehicle. So, yes, the people who are buying hybrids to "save money on gas" ARE stupid. Do you think some people might want to save gas just for the hell of it? No. Remember John "my family owns an SUV, not me - honest" Kerry? Sorry, but you're wrong about that. John Kerry's family doesn't own an SUV? No idea. Doesn't matter. You're wrong about the fact that people won't buy certain products just because they have less impact on resources. You can't imagine this. What vehicles do you own? I own a 2002 Tacoma 6 cylinder. Why do you ask? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(non-political) comments on fuel economy and technology | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |