Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:24:41 GMT, "Bryan" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message .. . On 23 Mar 2006 09:23:29 -0800, wrote: Paid $2.91 at a normally competitive filling station for unleaded 92 octane yesterday. Looks like a repeat of the 2005 fuel pricing may be in store. Those *******s. But I guess you can't blame them, since most of the increase last year went straight to the Record Profit Bottom Line of the big oil companies and their stock prices have now been adjusted to take those profits into account. Failure to reproduce the same type of earnings this year would have a negative impact on future stock values, and we certainly couldn't have that, could we? What are you burning that high octane stuff in? I know Acura's require it, but most cars don't. Yesterday, in Holland, the price was almost $6 per gallon. Guess we shouldn't bitch too much. Why John? Why the hell should we feel good about our gas prices running up just because the price of gas is higher somewhere else. I've never understood that argument. "Feel good?" Did I say that somewhere? Have you never felt a little self-satisfied when you got a little better deal than the next guy? There are people here who wish to have flame wars. I'm not one of them. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(non-political) comments on fuel economy and technology | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General |