Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Those special union benefits
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Idle Hands Detroit's Symbol of Dysfunction: Paying Employees Not to Work Cost Tops $1.4 Billion a Year Among all their other nutty ideas, I wonder if GM thought it was a good way to keep these people from moving away and going to work for Toyota, etc. They were trying to lock up their employee base to tap into when times are good. As a small business owner, I can only imagine the headaches involved for a large company trying to staff the appropriate number of employees for such a cyclical business. On a much, much smaller scale, I face a similar dilemma. Naples is becoming more and more a year-round residence, but for many it is still very seasonal. I desperately need a second hygienist for October through May...but then one hygienist is more than enough in the Summer months. Do I hire the second hygienist and then put her in the "rubber room" from June through September? No. You assume that your favorite patients also have nice friends, and figure out a way to incentivize them to bring those friends in. If it works, you can keep the second hygienist year round. My hygienist was booked out 4-6 weeks last summer. That was the first time such a thing happened. Currently, I don't have a prophy appointment available until July unless somebody cancels their already-scheduled appointment. But adding a second hygienist means building a second treatment room...and adding another dental assistant. And a man's headaches are directly proportional to: a) the number of internal combustion engines he owns, and/or 2) the number of women in his employ. ;-) |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Those special union benefits
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... And a man's headaches are directly proportional to: a) the number of internal combustion engines he owns, and/or 2) the number of women in his employ. ;-) Almost correct. Change "man" to "boy". Men have no problem with women. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Those special union benefits
Doug Kanter wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... And a man's headaches are directly proportional to: a) the number of internal combustion engines he owns, and/or 2) the number of women in his employ. ;-) Almost correct. Change "man" to "boy". Men have no problem with women. Hee hee! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General |