Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
RCE
 
Posts: n/a
Default Leaving aside the "politics"...


wrote in message
oups.com...


Nations form when people have common bonds of language, religion,
tradition, and other values. Trying to make a nation from three groups
like the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds is like pouring crankcase oil,
water, and honey into a gallon jug and then wondering why it doesn't
all blend together nicely. The Brits probably thought, "Hell, nobody
lives out there but a bunch of sand people anyway- so let's just lump a
big area together, give it a name, and make it easier to administer."

The only reason it hadn't fallen apart in the last 20 years is that
Saddam insisted on a secular government and also scared the crap out of
all sides. The US has allowed the people to vote in a constitution that
is at least semi-religious, and we can't scare the crap out of
*anybody* without playing into the propaganda program of the religious
fanatics.... we're in a tough spot. We should have looked at a bigger
picture before invading this place, but now that we're there it's
obvious that *nobody* has a good solution for resolving matters and
getting out. Too bad.


Chuck,

Good job. You have hit the nerve of this problem and you are 100% correct,
IMO.

RCE


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default Leaving aside the "politics"...


"RCE" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


Nations form when people have common bonds of language, religion,
tradition, and other values. Trying to make a nation from three groups
like the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds is like pouring crankcase oil,
water, and honey into a gallon jug and then wondering why it doesn't
all blend together nicely. The Brits probably thought, "Hell, nobody
lives out there but a bunch of sand people anyway- so let's just lump a
big area together, give it a name, and make it easier to administer."


According to Churchill's grandson, his grandfather favored the creation of
"Kurdistan". It was the rest of the British parliament that opposed the
creation of Kurdistan.

I have to wonder what effect that would have had on the region over the past
eight or nine decades.



The only reason it hadn't fallen apart in the last 20 years is that
Saddam insisted on a secular government and also scared the crap out of
all sides. The US has allowed the people to vote in a constitution that
is at least semi-religious, and we can't scare the crap out of
*anybody* without playing into the propaganda program of the religious
fanatics.... we're in a tough spot. We should have looked at a bigger
picture before invading this place, but now that we're there it's
obvious that *nobody* has a good solution for resolving matters and
getting out. Too bad.


So in other words, we're back to where things were early 19th century...and
Bush is in the position to play Churchill's role all over again. Maybe this
time he'll do it right and carve the country up into three separate regions.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leaving aside the "politics"... Doug Kanter General 3 February 26th 06 01:15 PM
Leaving aside the "politics"... Bert Robbins General 1 February 25th 06 12:43 AM
Leaving aside the "politics"... JohnH General 0 February 24th 06 09:58 PM
Leaving soon, Bob Scotty ASA 0 January 30th 06 10:50 AM
Leaving now, Scotty Potty Capt. Rob ASA 2 January 30th 06 01:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017