Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:50:42 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:01:24 GMT in rec.boats, Shortwave Sportfishing penned the following thoughts: On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:48:20 GMT, Gene Kearns wrote: Quit trying to spin this. The whole concept is just wrong. Not only just PLAIN wrong.... it is wrong for America. I've been watching this thread with some interest because I regard it as strictly business, but here's a question for you Gene - which US company could do the job? Halliburton? :) A well taken point.... and I suspect those intent on selecting either option either don't have their attention focused on what is best for the US and/or have a private agenda. As for ANY company doing the job, one needs to consider that no corporation holds as its priority it customers (in this case, the American citizens and government), but logically owes allegiance solely to its stockholders. Thus, privatization is not the panacea that some would wish you to believe. To me this port deal is a lot like mail ordering a car from North Korea and expecting a good product and good customer service. It is hard enough to get a good product and ensuing support from Ford and GM and I can walk to their place of business. Gene, what is it that you fear the Dubai folks would allow through our ports? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
Grist for the discussion mill....(long)... | General | |||
Post-panamex vessels coming to port | General | |||
Beckson port leaking | Cruising | |||
Connecting all the nav instruments together? | Electronics |