Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:24:37 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Reggie Smithers" wrote in message ... Port Operations is not part of our national security, I would hate to think we have turned over national security to a bunch of Longshoreman and a company whose responsibility is to unload freight as quickly as possible. The national security of our ports is and should be the responsibility's of US Custom and Homeland Security. Did you read the article by Clark Kent Ervin, in which he said there *is* some overlap between port management and security. Which part of the 5th paragraph do you not believe, and why don't you believe it? (Clark Kent Ervin, the inspector general of the Homeland Security Department from 2003 to 2004, is the author of the forthcoming "Open Target: Where America is Vulnerable to Attack.") Doug, if Customs folks and crane operators pee in the same toilet there is some overlap. *What* overlap? You are trying to make it sound as though they are the same function. They aren't. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
Grist for the discussion mill....(long)... | General | |||
Post-panamex vessels coming to port | General | |||
Beckson port leaking | Cruising | |||
Connecting all the nav instruments together? | Electronics |