Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
... Fine, but you are in love with this, which you said earlier - you keep saying it: "Port Operations is not part of our national security". Ervin, who knows more about this than you or I, says otherwise. Do you doubt what he says? If you do doubt what he says, explain why. Erwin knows more than I do. We should never turn over national security to Longshoreman and a company whose priority is to move fright as quickly as possible. The threat exists no matter who owns the fright line. -- Reggie Longshoreman aren't the issue. They wield enough power to shut down any port in this country. Ervin said the operator will be in charge of hiring OTHER employees who are not longshoreman, and whose job will involve security that is NOT PROVIDED BY CUSTOMS & COAST GUARD. That's the weakness. If you think that a night security guard can't be paid to look the other way for 15 minutes, you are crazy. Among other things, members of congress want to know what kinds of background checks will be done on employees. Anyone who thinks it's unfair for them to ask this question is a complete idiot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
Grist for the discussion mill....(long)... | General | |||
Post-panamex vessels coming to port | General | |||
Beckson port leaking | Cruising | |||
Connecting all the nav instruments together? | Electronics |