http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

In article , says...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

You're a friggin' idiot, Snippy.

Nice thing is you've got plenty of company.

jps

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

That author's on drugs.

" But I'm not talking about his diplomatic recognition of Communist-occupied
China, and his betrayal of our loyal friends on Taiwan. "

He seems to have forgotten that diplomatic recognition of China began in
earnest with Nixon and Kissinger.

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
jps wrote in
:

In article , says...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

You're a friggin' idiot, Snippy.

What statement(s) in the article is/are false?

Want a list? Not necessary. One screwup destroys the author's credibility.
See my other message.

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:


"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
jps wrote in
:

In article , says...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

You're a friggin' idiot, Snippy.

What statement(s) in the article is/are false?

Want a list?

Yes.

Not necessary. One screwup destroys the author's
credibility. See my other message.

http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/docs/jc/790101.htm

"The United States of America and the People's Republic of China have
agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations as of
January 1, 1979."

Article's right. You're wrong.

Oh. I forgot. You need simplicity, so you point to the date when a piece of
paper was signed. You don't want to know that the Chinese put on a banquet
for Nixon in 69 or 71 - somewhere in that range, and that we were also
sending diplomats (and ping pong players) back & forth constantly in those
days.

Doug Kanter wrote:

http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

You're a friggin' idiot, Snippy.

What statement(s) in the article is/are false?

One screwup destroys the author's credibility.

The Islamic fundies have declared WAR on America. We are in the war
today. Can you imagine what they will think if she is elected CIC? Real
Americans have had it with the two-faced Jimmy Carters and GI Janes:

http://tinyurl.com/cjov8

--
Skipper

Fred Dehl wrote:

What statement(s) in the article is/are false?

Want a list?

Yes.

Not necessary. One screwup destroys the author's
credibility. See my other message.

http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/docs/jc/790101.htm

"The United States of America and the People's Republic of China have
agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations as of
January 1, 1979."

Article's right. You're wrong.

Good get!

--
Skipper

Doug Kanter wrote:

http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/docs/jc/790101.htm

"The United States of America and the People's Republic of China have
agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations as of
January 1, 1979."

Article's right. You're wrong.

Oh. I forgot. You need simplicity, so you point to the date when a piece of
paper was signed. You don't want to know that the Chinese put on a banquet
for Nixon in 69 or 71 - somewhere in that range, and that we were also
sending diplomats (and ping pong players) back & forth constantly in those
days.

One really can't dismiss the damage Carter has inflicted on the US when
he gave away the Canal, turned his back on our Middle East allies, and
allowed China to become today's predominant power. History will record
Carter as the worst President and ex-President in US history. And that's
saying something considering LBJ.

--
Skipper

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:


"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:


"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
jps wrote in
:

In article , says...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

You're a friggin' idiot, Snippy.

What statement(s) in the article is/are false?

Want a list?

Yes.

Not necessary. One screwup destroys the author's
credibility. See my other message.

http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/docs/jc/790101.htm

"The United States of America and the People's Republic of China have
agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations
as of January 1, 1979."

Article's right. You're wrong.

Oh. I forgot. You need simplicity, so you point to the date when a
piece of paper was signed. You don't want to know that the Chinese put
on a banquet for Nixon in 69 or 71 - somewhere in that range, and that
we were also sending diplomats (and ping pong players) back & forth
constantly in those days.

If you put ping pong players ahead of embassies in the defining of "the
establishment of diplomatic relations" there is no hope for you.

Not that this comes as news to anybody.

So, you're not familiar with the sheer volume of government contact we had
with China, 10 years before that piece of paper was signed? I suppose if the
piece of paper suits your definition of "who sucked off the Chinese first",
there's not much I can do to change your mind. But, the fact is, it was
Nixon & Kissinger. Nixon *needed* to do it, to put some kind of positive
spin on his work at the time.

How old are you?

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
http://www.patriotist.com/miscarch/as20020610.htm

--
Skipper

That author's on drugs.

" But I'm not talking about his diplomatic recognition of
Communist-occupied China, and his betrayal of our loyal friends on
Taiwan. "

http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/uscn/docs/jc/790101.htm

"The United States of America and the People's Republic of China have
agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations as of
January 1, 1979."

It appears you're the one on drugs.

That's your definition of when the serious dancing began? The piece of
paper? Not the 10 years' of work which began with Nixon & Kissinger?