Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnH" wrote in message
... He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. I didn't ask the question correctly. Do you think the operator could negatively affect security if they wanted to? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:03:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. I didn't ask the question correctly. Do you think the operator could negatively affect security if they wanted to? He could, unless the port security was doing its job properly. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:03:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message m... He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. I didn't ask the question correctly. Do you think the operator could negatively affect security if they wanted to? He could, unless the port security was doing its job properly. I wish all terrorists thought the way you do. We'd have nothing to worry about. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:11:54 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:03:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message om... He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. I didn't ask the question correctly. Do you think the operator could negatively affect security if they wanted to? He could, unless the port security was doing its job properly. I wish all terrorists thought the way you do. We'd have nothing to worry about. Doug, no where in our posts have I commented on my opinion of the idea. I tried to keep my posts non-political. I did respond with my opinion to basskisser, however. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:11:54 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:03:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:46:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message om... He said nothing about port security. He was speaking of port operations. For some reason, many of you are confusing the two. Last I heard, we were barely able to check 10% of incoming containers. If a hostile party controlled operations, do you think that number could change, either by manipulating security, or other means? Not unless we beef up port security, i.e., the Coast Guard and Border Patrol. Crane operators don't inspect containers. I didn't ask the question correctly. Do you think the operator could negatively affect security if they wanted to? He could, unless the port security was doing its job properly. I wish all terrorists thought the way you do. We'd have nothing to worry about. PS. Unless I'm mistaken, port operations are pretty well unionized. I can't imagine the unions allowing any terrorist activities to occur regardless of who the supervisors are. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General | |||
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? | General |