|
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. No it wasn't. Time for Doug's Perfect Question, not used in quite some time: Who told you to say that? Nobody you've ever heard of said it was OK for Clinton to lie. The only point ever made was that lying about sex is on quite a different scale than lies which cost thousands of lives. The Dems said that repeatedly....after all, it was only about sex.....remember? checking my English/Spanish switch here....just a sec.... Nobody said he didn't lie. You know that. The Dems said it did not matter. It was only about sex after all, and no one cared about the lying to the grand jury. Remember???? Saying it didn't matter and saying he didn't lie are two completely different things. Any English teacher would slam you and keep you after school if you continued with this line of thinking. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message ... So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. No it wasn't. Time for Doug's Perfect Question, not used in quite some time: Who told you to say that? Nobody you've ever heard of said it was OK for Clinton to lie. The only point ever made was that lying about sex is on quite a different scale than lies which cost thousands of lives. The Dems said that repeatedly....after all, it was only about sex.....remember? checking my English/Spanish switch here....just a sec.... Nobody said he didn't lie. You know that. The Dems said it did not matter. It was only about sex after all, and no one cared about the lying to the grand jury. Remember???? Saying it didn't matter and saying he didn't lie are two completely different things. Any English teacher would slam you and keep you after school if you continued with this line of thinking. The Dems said it did not matter that Clinton lied. That is all you need to know. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 14 Feb 2006 11:31:40 -0800, wrote: So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? Please note below: poach Main Entry: poach Function: verb Etymology: Middle French pocher, of Germanic origin; akin to Middle English poken to poke intransitive senses 1 : to encroach upon especially for the purpose of taking something 2 : to do what Vice President Cheny was doing, i.e., to trespass for the purpose of stealing game; also : to take game or fish illegally Note; this behavior is considered acceptable when performed by the VP. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Take it to your private NG a.politics. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? He had a license, just not a new type stamp. Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He poached. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. When did Clinton get caught for poaching? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him? But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? Did he any quail in his possession? Ah, don't want to answer the question, huh? Typical of you. Notice, "ATTEMPT to poach" Which, in most states IS illegal. Now again, do you think it's acceptable for the VP to lie? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. When did Clinton get caught for poaching? After he lied to the Grand Jury. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him? But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it? Get away with what? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? He had a license, just not a new type stamp. Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He poached. So? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com