| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
|
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. When did Clinton get caught for poaching? After he lied to the Grand Jury. Cite? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him? But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it? Get away with what? Try to follow the thread, Jim, okay? Look up 13 lines from here........ |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? He had a license, just not a new type stamp. Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He poached. So? So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. When did Clinton get caught for poaching? After he lied to the Grand Jury. Cite? Calling Doug Kanter, come in Doug.........I thought you said no one denied that Clinton lied to the GJ. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. When did Clinton get caught for poaching? After he lied to the Grand Jury. Cite? Calling Doug Kanter, come in Doug.........I thought you said no one denied that Clinton lied to the GJ. It doesn't matter if he did. Take your blood pressure meds quick! |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message
oups.com... So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? I wonder if the law there works like fishing regs here. If you're fishing a pond on private property, there are no legal "seasons" on the fish. You're dumb to do it unless you're loaded with extra bass or whatever. But, you can do it. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? He had a license, just not a new type stamp. Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He poached. So? So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? A minor hunting law while on private property......yes. Got it? |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
On 15 Feb 2006 12:55:54 -0800, wrote:
JimH wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 14 Feb 2006 13:05:27 -0800, wrote: JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? It was OK for Clinton to do it.........and to a grand jury. Really? Then why did your party choose to spend those millions upon millions of dollars to have Ken Starr prosecute him? But, then again, you think Cheney should get away with it? It appears, since you're quoting him, that Jim is trying to suck you in to a heated political discussion. Don't let him do it. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** Take it to alt.sheriffs.netcopping Here we go. Jim's going off the deep end....again.... Nah, he's just hankerin' for a fight. He won't get it from me, and it's been buggin' him. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
|
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:02:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? I wonder if the law there works like fishing regs here. If you're fishing a pond on private property, there are no legal "seasons" on the fish. You're dumb to do it unless you're loaded with extra bass or whatever. But, you can do it. In any place I've hunted, the season was the season, whether on private property (which most of it was) or not. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:02:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? I wonder if the law there works like fishing regs here. If you're fishing a pond on private property, there are no legal "seasons" on the fish. You're dumb to do it unless you're loaded with extra bass or whatever. But, you can do it. In any place I've hunted, the season was the season, whether on private property (which most of it was) or not. -- 'Til next time, John H Different for fish, I guess. They have a tendency to stay put once you put them in the pond. Usually. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Calif Bill wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "DSK" wrote in message ... After the White House reluctantly conceded yesterday that it sat on the blockbuster news that Cheney shot a hunting buddy Saturday, the veep's office revealed he didn't even have the proper $7 stamp on his hunting license to shoot quail in Texas. NOYB wrote: He didn't shoot a quail. He shot a Whittington. Doesn't matter. If you're in the woods with a gun, during hunting season, you darn well better have all the paperwork in order. It's kind of like sitting in a boat, with a fishing rod, and line, hook, bait, etc etc.... and the wildlife enforcement asks to see your fishing license. You can't just tell him, "Don't need one, we ain't caught nothin' anyhow." You can still fish for snook in Florida without a snook stamp...as long as you have a valid fishing license...and don't keep any snook. If Cheney wasn't in possession of any quail, he could easily argue he was hunting for squirrel or other rodents. So you think it's quite acceptable for the VP to attempt to poach, then when caught, lie? He had a license, just not a new type stamp. Uh, the stamp IS the license to hunt quail. He didn't have it. He poached. No, the license required to hunt is a hunting license. Extra stamps may be required, but it is not the hunting license. We have to have a fishing license. Plus if you fish in San Francisco bay all the way to Redding on the Sac River, you are required to have a delta enhancement stamp. You get caught without one, you do not get a fishing without a license ticket. You get another type ticket. Holy Hell!! I really don't care about what you WRONGLY think. Show me the CA statute that states that if you are caught without the proper stamp, that it IS NOT hunting without license/permit? Different fines. No license and the ticket is about $500. A couple of the judges give the person the choice of the fine or buy a lifetime license. Wrong, or missing stamp is probably a $100 TICKET. |
Poor Dick Cheney - the saga continues (guffaw)
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:02:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... So, he was hunting without a license. It's against the law in Texas. Do you think it's acceptable for the VP of the U.S. to break the law? I wonder if the law there works like fishing regs here. If you're fishing a pond on private property, there are no legal "seasons" on the fish. You're dumb to do it unless you're loaded with extra bass or whatever. But, you can do it. In any place I've hunted, the season was the season, whether on private property (which most of it was) or not. -- 'Til next time, John H Different for fish, I guess. They have a tendency to stay put once you put them in the pond. Usually. In Calif, different season length for gamebird farms. Since they raise the birds and release them to be hunted, it also helps the wild birds. Removes some pressure, and they have to release more than are shot. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com