![]() |
For my upcoming trip...
You sure thats enough?
|
For my upcoming trip...
wrote in message oups.com... You sure thats enough? Harry's a lousy shot and misses alot. Needs new glasses. RCE |
For my upcoming trip...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... my youngest boy is training in south carolina for the state police and they were issues their service weapons this past week - glock 22s with the 17 round system - one in the chamber, 16 in the clip. he was telling me he couldn't believe how quickly he could empty a clip at a target. Question for you. If someone who never owned a handgun was interested in getting one (and attending the required prerequisite course) which of the two following handguns would you recommend to simply have as a last resort means of personal family protection? Glock or ... 1911 (new) RCE |
For my upcoming trip...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... RCE wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... my youngest boy is training in south carolina for the state police and they were issues their service weapons this past week - glock 22s with the 17 round system - one in the chamber, 16 in the clip. he was telling me he couldn't believe how quickly he could empty a clip at a target. Question for you. If someone who never owned a handgun was interested in getting one (and attending the required prerequisite course) which of the two following handguns would you recommend to simply have as a last resort means of personal family protection? Glock or ... 1911 (new) RCE Glock is a brand name, while "1911" is more of a style. For the money, you cannot beat a Glock. They're simple, they're easy to clean, they're accurate, and they rarely have a problem firing. A good 1911 is a more complex piece, but also worthy. It is a "heavier" gun in every way, though. A 9 mm Glock will be light enough in recoil for a woman to use, yet deadly enough with practice to stop anyone. Plus, the ammo with which you practice is dirt cheap. The 9mm practice ammo I use is about $5.50 for 50 rounds. Glock also makes handguns in "heaver" calibers, including .45. The Glock, though, has no built-in safety in the traditional sense. If a round is chambered and you pull the trigger, it will fire. Period. A 1911 has the traditional "safety." You should keep your finger off the trigger until it is safe to fire and you are ready to fire. A new Glock will run you between $500 and $600 or so. A decent quality 1911 will run between $800 and a grand. Thanks. The 1911 I was looking at is manufactured by Colt, I believe. RCE |
For my upcoming trip...
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:34:47 -0500, "RCE" wrote:
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . my youngest boy is training in south carolina for the state police and they were issues their service weapons this past week - glock 22s with the 17 round system - one in the chamber, 16 in the clip. he was telling me he couldn't believe how quickly he could empty a clip at a target. Question for you. If someone who never owned a handgun was interested in getting one (and attending the required prerequisite course) which of the two following handguns would you recommend to simply have as a last resort means of personal family protection? Glock or ... 1911 (new) RCE I'd go with the Glock. Lighter and easier to shoot well. Of course, I've only had experience with well used 1911's. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
For my upcoming trip...
If you're going to become a competitive shooter, the 1911's are worth
looking atr. If you're goping to be a plinker and want a defensive weapon, get the Glock. It's absolutely reliable, carries a high capacity magazine and is cheap (relatively speaking). Get it in 9mm because, as Harry says, the ammo is cheap. And you may be able to get one used as a police trade-in. If you're keeping it at home as a defensive weapon, buy the frangible rounds. They're designed to break up on impact. They'll probably kill anyone you hit, but they won't go through the drywall and kill someone you didn't intend to shoot. And get the lessons. They'll help you to stay safe and keep everyone around you safe. And you'll learn how to hit what you're aiming at. |
For my upcoming trip...
wrote in message oups.com... If you're going to become a competitive shooter, the 1911's are worth looking atr. If you're goping to be a plinker and want a defensive weapon, get the Glock. It's absolutely reliable, carries a high capacity magazine and is cheap (relatively speaking). Get it in 9mm because, as Harry says, the ammo is cheap. And you may be able to get one used as a police trade-in. If you're keeping it at home as a defensive weapon, buy the frangible rounds. They're designed to break up on impact. They'll probably kill anyone you hit, but they won't go through the drywall and kill someone you didn't intend to shoot. And get the lessons. They'll help you to stay safe and keep everyone around you safe. And you'll learn how to hit what you're aiming at. I believe it's Sig that's offering factory refurbished 9mm guns at nice prices (through dealers, of course). If I recall, the company's taking these back in trade from police departments that are switching from 9mm to .40 or ..45. |
For my upcoming trip...
Harry Krause wrote:
I wouldn't keep a loaded pistol in my house. I do, however, have a loaded shotgun hidden but handy on each level. What's the difference? Four loaded, and hidden, shotguns in your four-story house but a loaded handgun where you don't have to "unhide" it is bad? If you have a loaded gun in your house you should have it readily accessible and be prepared to use it. Stashing one behind the refrigerator doesn't make sense. Dan |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com