JimH wrote:


"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive to
some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If you saw no clits, you didn't bother to look at the site you posted.
One of the celebrities has a photo layout that begins with her wearing
an evening gown, proceeds to exposed breasts, and ends up with "her"
squatting naked on a bed fingering her exposed sexual organ.

If you are going to post a link, you should know what's there. IMO.


If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to offend
folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor of a
woman's body.

No apology required.
There's a difference between noting that a site is offensive and being
personally offended.
I'm not effected one way or another by soft porn, except to feel that
it's pretty tragic for the victims on both the buying and selling end.




The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a thing
of beauty.

BTW: The link to the site was posted here several months ago and I do not
recall anyone being offended by it then. ;-)