......Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm ?

"JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...
.....Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm ?




Stop staring and decide already! ;-)

JimH wrote:
.....Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm ?

Both. And hopefully, at the same time!!!

JimH wrote:
.....Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm ?


Hmmmmmmmm, indeed.

I thought you had an adult or teenaged daughter, but apparently I was
mistaken.

As an aside, wouldn't it be good form to let people know when you're
linking them to a soft porn site? Maybe "clits and tits" would be a
better title for the thread. :-)

Don't these peek-a-boos into the realms of pubescent fantasy often
result in
a barrage of aggravating spam and invites to hard core sites?

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
.....Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm
?


Hmmmmmmmm, indeed.

I thought you had an adult or teenaged daughter, but apparently I was
mistaken.


No, you are not mistaken. And she has seen the site and had no problem with
it, as did my wife.


As an aside, wouldn't it be good form to let people know when you're
linking them to a soft porn site? Maybe "clits and tits" would be a
better title for the thread. :-)

"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive to
some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to offend
folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor of a
woman's body.

The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a thing
of beauty.

BTW: The link to the site was posted here several months ago and I do not
recall anyone being offended by it then. ;-)

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
.....Melanie Griffith http://www.hogrockcafe.com/melanie_griffith.htm
or
Jennifer Love Hewitt http://www.hogrockcafe.com/jennifer_love_hewitt.htm
?


Hmmmmmmmm, indeed.

I thought you had an adult or teenaged daughter, but apparently I was
mistaken.


No, you are not mistaken. And she has seen the site and had no problem
with it, as did my wife (seeing it and not being offended by it).


As an aside, wouldn't it be good form to let people know when you're
linking them to a soft porn site? Maybe "clits and tits" would be a
better title for the thread. :-)

"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive
to some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to
offend folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor
of a woman's body.

The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a
thing of beauty.

BTW: The link to the site was posted here several months ago and I do not
recall anyone being offended by it then. ;-)


Edit

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message news:wqqdnZ-

"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive
to
some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to
offend
folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor of a
woman's body.

The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a
thing
of beauty.

Wouldn't it be easier to have your wife pose naked in front of him?

Playboy is a celebration of a woman's body. Art....so to speak.
Hmmmmmmm.......

When I was 12, my pals and I chipped in quarters to buy Playboy, then sold
the pictures to the neighborhood boys while keeping the best ones ourselves.
Worked great until my mother discovered my stash while I was looking at
them. Should have used the "celebration of a woman's body" argument, but
the bulge in my drawers
said otherwise.

-Greg

JimH wrote:


"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive to
some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If you saw no clits, you didn't bother to look at the site you posted.
One of the celebrities has a photo layout that begins with her wearing
an evening gown, proceeds to exposed breasts, and ends up with "her"
squatting naked on a bed fingering her exposed sexual organ.

If you are going to post a link, you should know what's there. IMO.


If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to offend
folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor of a
woman's body.

No apology required.
There's a difference between noting that a site is offensive and being
personally offended.
I'm not effected one way or another by soft porn, except to feel that
it's pretty tragic for the victims on both the buying and selling end.




The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a thing
of beauty.

BTW: The link to the site was posted here several months ago and I do not
recall anyone being offended by it then. ;-)

wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:


"Clits and tits"? I saw no clits. And that word alone may be offensive
to
some. Perhaps you should have given a warning. ;-)

If you saw no clits, you didn't bother to look at the site you posted.
One of the celebrities has a photo layout that begins with her wearing
an evening gown, proceeds to exposed breasts, and ends up with "her"
squatting naked on a bed fingering her exposed sexual organ.

Glad to see you enjoyed perusing through the site Chuck. ;-)

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

If the site offended you or anyone else here I apologize. In hindsight
perhaps I should have put a warning in the original post so as not to
offend folks like you who may not appreciate the pure beauty and splendor
of a woman's body.

The images on that site are no worse than one would see in a Playboy
magazine, a magazine my wife and I bought for our son when he was 13 so he
could realize that women are not sex toys and that their bodies are a
thing of beauty.

Fascinating!

I told my son not to bring material such as Playboy et al into our home or
to purchase any such material, because I wanted him to show respect to
women.
I've also taught him to not bring rap or hip hop into our home or to
purchase such material because of it's blatant and pervasive degradation of
women and promotion of drugs and violence.

It's amazing how differently we all see things and decide right from wrong
for ourselves.