Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:17:56 GMT, "Bryan"
wrote:


" JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com wrote in message
...

"Bryan" wrote in message
.com...

Man puts down $2000 for a slip with water and electricity.
Owner sold the property and new owner flipped the property.
Current owner doesn't honor access to water and electricity.

Boat owner keeps boat for 7 weeks at slip without water and electrical
(details unclear).
Boat owner wants $2000 refunded.

Judge says?

Let me see the contract.

Verbal.


ill allow witnesses.

Now playing arm chair lawyer in cyber space :-)

Verbal contracts are still valid contracts. So unless the existence or
terms are in dispute. That would not be a issue.

If the new owner had no knowledge of the preexisting agreement I would
think the "Boat Owner" is suing the wrong person and has no business
relationship with the new owner.

If the new owner did know that this was a preexisting contract and still
accepted the sale he would have to honor it.

Ok I am sure I am wrong, but decided to give it a shot.

Capt Jack R.. - Cyber Esq:

"Jack Redington" wrote in message
ink.net...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:17:56 GMT, "Bryan"
wrote:


" JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com wrote in message
...

"Bryan" wrote in message
y.com...

Man puts down $2000 for a slip with water and electricity.
Owner sold the property and new owner flipped the property.
Current owner doesn't honor access to water and electricity.

Boat owner keeps boat for 7 weeks at slip without water and electrical
(details unclear).
Boat owner wants $2000 refunded.

Judge says?

Let me see the contract.

Verbal.


ill allow witnesses.

Now playing arm chair lawyer in cyber space :-)

Verbal contracts are still valid contracts. So unless the existence or
terms are in dispute. That would not be a issue.

If the new owner had no knowledge of the preexisting agreement I would
think the "Boat Owner" is suing the wrong person and has no business
relationship with the new owner.

If the new owner did know that this was a preexisting contract and still
accepted the sale he would have to honor it.

Ok I am sure I am wrong, but decided to give it a shot.

Capt Jack R.. - Cyber Esq:



I recently started playing a lawyer on TV so I must know what I am talking
about. ;-)

Bryan wrote:
" JimH" jimh_osudadATyahooDOT com wrote in message
...

"Bryan" wrote in message
. com...

Man puts down $2000 for a slip with water and electricity.
Owner sold the property and new owner flipped the property.
Current owner doesn't honor access to water and electricity.

Boat owner keeps boat for 7 weeks at slip without water and electrical
(details unclear).
Boat owner wants $2000 refunded.

Judge says?


Let me see the contract.



Verbal.



like they say...
'a verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on'