On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Thanks Mom.

BTW: He posed the statement about the deductions being only for the rich.

Have a nice day John.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

BTW: Everyone has a bad day every once in a while. I did indeed get into
with Harry the other day but I did so only to set his lies straight.

Funny that you never commented on his troll and continued arguing.

Regardless, I recall you having a bad *month* with calling Harry a word I
shall not repeat with every post you made to him.

My point is that we all have our bad days John and you being my netmommy is
not appreciated.

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 04:59:07 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
egroups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

BTW: Everyone has a bad day every once in a while. I did indeed get into
with Harry the other day but I did so only to set his lies straight.

Funny that you never commented on his troll and continued arguing.

I don't comment on Harry's troll and arguing because that's what Harry *wants*.

Regardless, I recall you having a bad *month* with calling Harry a word I
shall not repeat with every post you made to him.

Yes, that's true. I apologized for it, and it has not been repeated.

My point is that we all have our bad days John and you being my netmommy is
not appreciated.

Understood.



--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JimH wrote:
snip...

My point is that we all have our bad days John and you being my netmommy is
not appreciated.


Oh my my!
'Do as I say, not as I do'!