I may have talked about this idea before but it was inspired when I was
doing blister repairs on a boat and used a heat gun. The heat gun
literally drove water from the hull and it poured out of adjacent
blisters so...........Why waste time heating the glass when you really
want to heat the water and other polar molecules. Enclose the boat in
a cover of aluminized plastic and put a microwave generator inside.
The water and other polar molecules in the gel coat would be driven out
over a few days. Of course you'd have to keep the power level low
enough to not cause arcing near any metal fittings but that should be
easy. You might want to score the gelcoat to facilitate the
evaporation of the water.
Next, you drive thermo-setting resin into the gel coat under pressure
or even slowly setting ultra-low viscosity epoxy. Finally a sealer
coat. No BS gel coat peeling that fails 80 % of the time.

wrote in message
oups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?

Jim:

I do not mean to ignore your questions and apologize if I did. I
simply did not understand the question. It may have been obvious to
you but I missed it somehow.

wrote in message
ups.com...
Jim:

I do not mean to ignore your questions and apologize if I did. I
simply did not understand the question. It may have been obvious to
you but I missed it somehow.



Fair enough. So how are boat loan interest deductions devoted only to the
*rich* as you earlier claimed?

Even my twenty foot runabout cuddy would have qualified for the credit
before I tore out the sink, ice maker and alcohol stove. Regardless, I paid
cash for the deal and do not qualify.

Do you now understand my point?

NOW I see. OK, maybe we should simply eliminate all such deductions.

Google Groups is being very balky tonite.

On 2 Jan 2006 19:44:19 -0800, "
wrote:

NOW I see. OK, maybe we should simply eliminate all such deductions.

Google Groups is being very balky tonite.

Thanks guy!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Thanks Mom.

BTW: He posed the statement about the deductions being only for the rich.

Have a nice day John.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

BTW: Everyone has a bad day every once in a while. I did indeed get into
with Harry the other day but I did so only to set his lies straight.

Funny that you never commented on his troll and continued arguing.

Regardless, I recall you having a bad *month* with calling Harry a word I
shall not repeat with every post you made to him.

My point is that we all have our bad days John and you being my netmommy is
not appreciated.

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 04:59:07 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:28:17 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOTcom
wrote:


wrote in message
egroups.com...
I may have talked about this idea before.........

Here is an idea. Why not address questions presented to you in other
threads you started before starting yet another new thread?


Jim, are you just looking for a fight? My gosh, you posed the question,

"For the rich????????"

Was that really supposed to be more than rhetorical?

You're trying with Harry, now you're trying with dhohara. Why not knock it
off?

Jeeeesh!

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

BTW: Everyone has a bad day every once in a while. I did indeed get into
with Harry the other day but I did so only to set his lies straight.

Funny that you never commented on his troll and continued arguing.

I don't comment on Harry's troll and arguing because that's what Harry *wants*.

Regardless, I recall you having a bad *month* with calling Harry a word I
shall not repeat with every post you made to him.

Yes, that's true. I apologized for it, and it has not been repeated.

My point is that we all have our bad days John and you being my netmommy is
not appreciated.

Understood.



--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes