Fine. Name some entitlement programs that cut checks to the wealthy.


Is a gov't benefit *solely* a matter of handing out money?


Fred Dehl wrote:
How else would you measure it?

Let's see... how many poor people drive their motor homes
into National Parks each year? How many poor people have
their investment portfolios regulated by the SEC? How many
poor people get their businesses handed cost-plus no-bid
contracts?


... Would you claim that a rich person
receives more 'benefit" from the military because they are protecting his
more valuable house from terrorist attack?

Yes. Would you make the claim that he's not gaining more
benefit?

... Then you're in essence
saying that the rich person's very life is more valuable than the life of
a poor person.


Not really, I'm saying that the rich people benefit more
from a wider range of gov't activities than just handing out
checks.... speaking of which, why is Dept of Faith-Based
Initiatives not getting audited?



.... You claimed that the poor are
"subsidizing" the rich.

If they are paying more in taxes than they are gaining in
benefit, then that is exactly what is happening.


You've shown nothing to demonstrate this.

Yes, I have. You just don't understand.



Meanwhile, the rich receive the lion's share of luxury
consumer goods, medical care, desirable real estate, etc etc
etc.


None of which is provided by government. And they only "receive" it
because they pay someone else money for it.

Uh huh. And this all happens by itself? The gov't has
nothing to do with business, trade, laws, etc etc?

The social/economic/legal system that we operate under is
what makes it possible for the rich to buy these things.
They don't "just happen." Without gov't that system would
not function. Is the light beginning to dawn Fred?

DSK