010011110101010000111010
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:48:22 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:


010101000110111101101101001011000000110100001010 010010110
110000101110010011001010110111000100000011010010 111001100
100000011101110110111101110010011010110110100101 101110011
001110010000001100001011100110010000001101000011 000010111
001001100100001000000110000101110011001000000100 100001100
001011100100111001001111001001000000110100101110 011001000
000110100101101110001000000110011101100101011101 000111010
001101001011011100110011100001101000010100110000 101101110
001000000110000101110010011001110111010101101101 011001010
110111001110100001000000110011101101111011010010 110111001
100111001011100010000000100000010101000110100001 100101001
000000110101101101001011011100110010001100101011 100100010
000001100111011001010110111001110100011011000110 010101110
010001000000000110100001010011100100110010101100 011001011
100110001001101111011000010111010001110011001000 000110100
101110011001000000111010001101111011011110010000 001100010
011011110111001001101001011011100110011100100000 011001100
110111101110010001000000111010001101000011001010 110110100
10111000001101000010


No - it's not that at all. Some people can't do anything other than
criticize, complain and cut 'n paste issues to "prove" their points.

Karen actually did have something intelligent and on topic to say, but
she lost all credibility when she cut 'n paste what I said to prove
her point about FICHTS - it's very much akin to lying.

She is what she is - unimaginative, uncreative, uninspired, unoriginal
and bit with the green eyed jealousy bug.

Whoa there Tommy my ultra boring boy; you better do some cutting &
pasting of your own. You're the current OT queen & all I did was inject
some on topic for you, got any actual rejoinders on the boating subject???

Truly Tom you post machine code as if it is of interest to anyone in a
boating NG???

I assume it's your 1 in 3 failure admission that has upset you?????
well how do you count then??? Till recently you'd bought 3 fichts & one
had failed?? which is a pretty poor record?? I mean the dealers tried to
hide 1 in 5 it was so bad, I now point out that you've got yourself back
on par by buying 2 more so now you're at the worst they were prepared to
admit which is the dealer scary 1 in 5.

As for all the "uns" that's OK by me but of course I actually have the
runs on the board regarding the DFI engines & OMC was the case study
till the test dummy died:-)

So far all you do is spruik dealer BS in a deceptive & selfish attempt
to trap other unsuspecting boaters into the same trap you've boxed
yourself into; a failed engine system. Of course you'll deny same but
hey as I said, I have the proof.

Did you hear about the ficht failures exactly as we predicted within a
couple of months of their release, have you looked at the pathetic
attempts of E-tec not to even try to resolve the causes but to try to
build an engine strong enough to hold together a little longer with
special high melting point pistons, treated bores, special high temp
oil, new head fastening, new plumbing etc etc all not to address the
original still existing issue but feeble OMC style attempts to "live"
with it on other peoples' money!!

My original 98 OMC complaints remain, not enough injection pressure,
not enough atomisation, a mixture at power way too lean to be safe & a
suicidal lubrication system (although this has always been the standard
for any OMC based product:-)).

Anyway no need to thank me for trying to get your thread back on topic I
wasn't really expecting any:-) but hey at least the ultra boring machine
code went:-) Did I really type a treated bore above & not reference
you?? see kinder & nicer NG to a fault:-)

For the record the new improve NG doesn't mean I have to tolerate
endless OT threads nor mean I can't make on topic comments??? we've
gotten rid of the mindless political stuff now lets discuss the boating
subjects I'm always willing to say what I say about your E-Tec disaster
why are you so worried about it???

K

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:39:39 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:

I sent him a very polite email. I recommended he use rec.boats as a place
to discuss boating and share his boating knowledge, and use another
newsgroup to have a flamefest. He didn't like my suggestion.





Ditto and ditto.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:39 -0500, " JimH" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.


Why? I'm assuming you're referring to Smithers. Why was it wrong for him to send an
email? Heck, I'd rather it be done by email than in the group.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that there
was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?



" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.

010011110101010000111010
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:39 -0500, " JimH" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.


Why? I'm assuming you're referring to Smithers. Why was it wrong for him
to send an
email? Heck, I'd rather it be done by email than in the group.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Because Harry has stated repeatedly he is ignoring him. So why push the
issue by sending an email?

010011110101010000111010
 

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that
there was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?





Because he has stated many times he is ignoring you. You are just pushing
the issue by sending him an email when he apparently does not wish to
communicate with you.

JMHO.

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH,

You might be correct, this would not be the first time I have been wrong,
but when someone mentions my name numerous times a day, he really isn't
ignoring me and he really is communicating with me many times a day. I have
always thought personal discussions are better handled via email. In my
ignorance, I believed Harry would get bored of posting insults if we
communicated one on one. But, if Harry believes he will feel better by
calling me a droller or poser or whatever, isn't it better that he handles
that via email instead of the NG?

Since Harry has already mentioned my email I will repost it here (including
typos) to see if anyone considers my email inflammatory. :

Harry,
Since everyone in rec.boats (including Shortwavet Sportfishing, Eisboch,
Chuck Gould and Gene Keans have all asked you politely to take your
inflammatory comments and name calling to another newsgroup, why do you
continue to try to start flame wars?

Certainly there are lots of NG for you to have a flamefest. If you continue
to troll, the few who considered you a friend, will get tired of your
antics.

Just some friendly advice from a friend."

********* end of email. ***************

If I thought Harry would use my email as an attempt to start another
rec.boats trollfest, I would not have sent it. My email was a serious
attempt at putting Harry's and my silly battles behind us.

I am not sure you noticed I did something very similar with Basskisser/
Atl_Man ( I started calling him "Atl" and no longer call him the name he
doesn't like) and I mentioned a nice Atlanta restaurant he would enjoy.
Bassy responded in a friendly manner, so it can be effective.

As I said, I might be wrong, but my email was a serious attempt at putting
Harry's and my personal battles aside, or at the very least take them out of
rec.boats.






" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that
there was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?





Because he has stated many times he is ignoring you. You are just pushing
the issue by sending him an email when he apparently does not wish to
communicate with you.

JMHO.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote:

One last time - you have nothing, zero, nada - no knowledge of the
subject, no idea of what the technology is, no idea of the - well -
truth.

I believe you can tell a lot about a pleasure boater by looking at his
or her boat.

Got a picture of that fab 36-footer, Krause?

The first time I saw a photo of that P.O.S. boat of hers, I knew she was
a fraud. No real boater who dispenses "advise" as readily as Ms. Smith
would own a boat that was in as rotten shape as hers.

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

--
Skipper

010011110101010000111010
 

Skipper,
If we all ignore the non boating flames, we just might be able to get this
NG back on track.


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote:

One last time - you have nothing, zero, nada - no knowledge of the
subject, no idea of what the technology is, no idea of the - well -
truth.

I believe you can tell a lot about a pleasure boater by looking at his
or her boat.

Got a picture of that fab 36-footer, Krause?

The first time I saw a photo of that P.O.S. boat of hers, I knew she was
a fraud. No real boater who dispenses "advise" as readily as Ms. Smith
would own a boat that was in as rotten shape as hers.

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

--
Skipper

010011110101010000111010
 

Reggie Smithers wrote:

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

Skipper, If we all ignore the non boating flames, we just might be
able to get this NG back on track.

Agree Krause should be ignored.

--
Skipper