010011110101010000111010
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
01010100011010000110010100100000011001010110111001 10
01000010000001101001011100110010000001101110011001 01
01100001011100100010000100100001001000010000110100 00
1010

01010010011101010110111000100000011001100110111101 11
00100010000001111001011011110111010101110010001000 00
01101100011010010111011001100101011100110010000100 10
000100100001

010011000110000101110100011001010111001000101100

0101010001101111011011010000110100001010


You blokes must have cabin fever real bad or is this just more of Tom
trying to make believe he knows computer stuff??? Sorry Tom about as
much luck as you're having being convincing with E-Tecs, except of
course they're on topic??? (Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by
actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)

Nobody actually writes machine code & hasn't for yonks, that's what
computer languages do, but of course anyone can go to a website &
convert, but who would actually be so bloody boring???

http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/Pl...ry_To_Text.asp

Oops ................................. but hey he'll grow out of it;
most kids grow out of doctored camera snaps so give it another century &
he'll be OK.


K

010011110101010000111010
 

01010100011011110110110100101100000011010000101001 0010110
11000010111001001100101011011100010000001101001011 1001100
10000001110111011011110111001001101011011010010110 1110011
00111001000000110000101110011001000000110100001100 0010111
00100110010000100000011000010111001100100000010010 0001100
00101110010011100100111100100100000011010010111001 1001000
00011010010110111000100000011001110110010101110100 0111010
00110100101101110011001110000110100001010011000010 1101110
00100000011000010111001001100111011101010110110101 1001010
11011100111010000100000011001110110111101101001011 0111001
10011100101110001000000010000001010100011010000110 0101001
00000011010110110100101101110011001000110010101110 0100010
00000110011101100101011011100111010001101100011001 0101110
01000100000000011010000101001110010011001010110001 1001011
10011000100110111101100001011101000111001100100000 0110100
10111001100100000011101000110111101101111001000000 1100010
01101111011100100110100101101110011001110010000001 1001100
11011110111001000100000011101000110100001100101011 0110100
10111000001101000010

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by
actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)


Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

What Karen knows about anything can be written on the head of a pin -
the sharp end.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry,
Why don't you just filter her since you don't believe she has anything to
contribute to rec.boats?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by
actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

What Karen knows about anything can be written on the head of a pin -
the sharp end.


I gave up on her knowing anything practically useful after her explanation
of determining the pitch of a prop by using a barn, a ball of twine, and a
magic marker, and after seeing photos of her hulk of a boat and kitbashed
"outdoor" diesel motor.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3,
buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start
to look like a good idea:-)



Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or three.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)



Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin" English
was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.


I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

010011110101010000111010
 

" JimH" wrote in message
. ..

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3,
buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)



Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English
was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.


I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

Did you really expect them to? If everyone else would completely stop
responding to those that constantly post the personal attacks, they will end
up playing with themselves and hopefully get bored and go away.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3,
buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start
to look like a good idea:-)


Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.


I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?


I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers, Fritz,
and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just the same as
always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry. Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry,

I am surprised that you find my behavior unacceptable. I have ignored your
comments about me being a "right-wing drooler" or any of the other insults
you have made towards me, because I am not interested in having a silly
argument. Is there something in particular that you find offensive that you
would like me to change?

I am not interested in offending you or anyone else


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3,
buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start
to look like a good idea:-)


Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.


I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?


I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers, Fritz,
and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just the same as
always.

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:39:10 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by
actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)


Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

What Karen knows about anything can be written on the head of a pin -
the sharp end.

Your personal attack is just going to prompt more.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:45:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by
actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

What Karen knows about anything can be written on the head of a pin -
the sharp end.


I gave up on her knowing anything practically useful after her
explanation of determining the pitch of a prop by using a barn, a ball
of twine, and a magic marker, and after seeing photos of her hulk of a
boat and kitbashed "outdoor" diesel motor.

That's what I mean.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry,
What practical boating information or boating discussion would you like
discuss?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.

I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just
the same as always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry. Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.


There's nothing "new and improved" here except the level of vapidity.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
Harry,
What practical boating information or boating discussion would you like
discuss?

He doesn't, as is obvious by his continued trolls. Everyone should
simply ignore all his posts.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you
have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1
in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey
they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a
nip..or
three.

I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just
the same as always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry. Don
then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get
your
jollies at another group.


There's nothing "new and improved" here except the level of vapidity.

010011110101010000111010
 

Paul,

You are correct.



"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
Harry,
What practical boating information or boating discussion would you like
discuss?

He doesn't, as is obvious by his continued trolls. Everyone should
simply ignore all his posts.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you
have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1
in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey
they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a
nip..or
three.

I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is
just
the same as always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry. Don
then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get
your
jollies at another group.


There's nothing "new and improved" here except the level of vapidity.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.

I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just
the same as always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry.


B.S.

Show me.




Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.


You're issuing directives now?

We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:43:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)
Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.
I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?
I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just
the same as always.

No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry.

B.S.

Show me.



Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.

You're issuing directives now?

We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.



Go bitch to your lawyer.

Harry, based on your comments about the offensiveness of my "Merry Christmas and
Happy New Year" sig line, I've changed same. Now, could you honor my request, that
you keep the inflammatory comments in alt.obituaries?


--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:43:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you
have now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up
from 1 in 3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't &
hey they'll start to look like a good idea:-)
Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.
Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a
nip..or three.
I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?
I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is
just the same as always.
No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry.
B.S.
Show me.


Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get
your jollies at another group.
You're issuing directives now?
We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.

Go bitch to your lawyer.

Harry, based on your comments about the offensiveness of my "Merry
Christmas and
Happy New Year" sig line, I've changed same. Now, could you honor my
request, that
you keep the inflammatory comments in alt.obituaries?



I find whining annoying and inflammatory. Just thought you'd like to know.

I've also noticed that but for Chuck, those whining the loudest contribute
the least in terms of significant boating related content here.

I wonder why.

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

Harry Krause wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by


actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3, buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)



Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin" English
was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.



I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?


Attacks? I was defending her.... kinda...

010011110101010000111010
 

P. Fritz wrote:
" JimH" wrote in message
. ..

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by

actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now
equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in 3,
buy
more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll start to
look like a good idea:-)



Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English
was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.


I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

Did you really expect them to? If everyone else would completely stop
responding to those that constantly post the personal attacks, they will end
up playing with themselves and hopefully get bored and go away.



Peace be with you Paul.

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH wrote:


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry. Don then
decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.


Jim, your 'holier than thou' attitude is making it hard to stay the
course in this new & improved group.
A nice vacation might help.

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

JimH wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

Harry Krause wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

(Hey here's an xmas thought for you, by


actually buying for full tilt money yet another two fichts you have
now equally the admitted OMC failure rate of 1 in 5!!! up from 1 in
3, buy more, don't actually use as you clearly don't & hey they'll
start to look like a good idea:-)

Got English?

We've had posters here from former Sov bloc states whose "pidgin"
English was better than this broad's.

Oh well! This time of year you can't blame her for having a nip..or
three.

I thought you guys promised to stop the personal attacks?

I must have missed your posts "castigating" Karen Smith, Smithers,
Fritz, and the rest of the right-wing droolers whose behavior is just
the same as always.


No one has made personal attacks lately other than you Harry.


B.S.


Show me.




Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get your
jollies at another group.


You're issuing directives now?


We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.


I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait until
the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:48 GMT, Don White
wrote:

JimH wrote:

Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get
your jollies at another group.

You're issuing directives now?

We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.
I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait until
the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!

This is getting just plain creepy!


Commodore Joe Redcloud


You think Jim actually believes he is in charge?



Don't know. But I do know you no longer are.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:48 GMT, Don White
wrote:

JimH wrote:
Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or get
your jollies at another group.
You're issuing directives now?
We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.
I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait until
the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!
This is getting just plain creepy!


Commodore Joe Redcloud

You think Jim actually believes he is in charge?



Don't know. But I do know you no longer are.


You thought I was in charge here?

Nope. But you sure did. And the fact that the NG is changing for the
better by no longer being tolerated as your personal playground is killing
you..........eh Harry? ;-)

010011110101010000111010
 

" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:48 GMT, Don White
wrote:

JimH wrote:
Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or
get
your jollies at another group.
You're issuing directives now?
We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.
I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait
until
the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!
This is getting just plain creepy!


Commodore Joe Redcloud

You think Jim actually believes he is in charge?



Don't know. But I do know you no longer are.


You thought I was in charge here?

Nope. But you sure did. And the fact that the NG is changing for the
better by no longer being tolerated as your personal playground is
killing
you..........eh Harry? ;-)

It is amusing watching him tilt at windmills.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:48 GMT, Don White
wrote:

JimH wrote:
Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or
get your jollies at another group.
You're issuing directives now?
We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.
I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait
until the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!
This is getting just plain creepy!


Commodore Joe Redcloud
You think Jim actually believes he is in charge?


Don't know. But I do know you no longer are.

You thought I was in charge here?

Nope. But you sure did. And the fact that the NG is changing for the
better by no longer being tolerated as your personal playground is
killing you..........eh Harry? ;-)

Sorry, fella, but your posts indicate *you* take usenet seriously.


Yep, I do take the comradary and friendships here seriously and hope that
the tone of the NG changes, as most here do.


My posts indicate just the opposite.


Well said. I agree.

Find another playground Harry.

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Commodore Joe Redcloud wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:48 GMT, Don White
wrote:

JimH wrote:
Don then

decided to pile on. Either join in the new and improved NG or
get your jollies at another group.
You're issuing directives now?
We all are Harry. Accept it or move on to another NG.
I'll have a directive for you JimH... but as promised I'll wait
until the New Year to issue it.
Peace be with you!
This is getting just plain creepy!


Commodore Joe Redcloud
You think Jim actually believes he is in charge?

Don't know. But I do know you no longer are.
You thought I was in charge here?
Nope. But you sure did. And the fact that the NG is changing for the
better by no longer being tolerated as your personal playground is
killing you..........eh Harry? ;-)
Sorry, fella, but your posts indicate *you* take usenet seriously.


Yep, I do take the comradary and friendships here seriously and hope that
the tone of the NG changes, as most here do.


My posts indicate just the opposite.


Well said. I agree.

Find another playground Harry.


You're in no position to issue directives here or anywhere else.


So solly Challie............but the tribe has spoken. Accept it or move on.



What are you going to do, send me snotty emails like your buddy Smithers?


The new change of tone in the NG is really a traumatic event for
you........isn't it? Take it one day at a time Harry. Baby
steps........you can do it.

Most everyone else has accepted it and the number of new members/posters
here has increased as a result of it.

Seriously. You have a lot to offer this group. Give the new tone a try.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry Krause wrote:


You're in no position to issue directives here or anywhere else.

What are you going to do, send me snotty emails like your buddy Smithers?


The theme to Twilight Zone blares out of my speakers when I read JimH's
posts. The next four days are going to be long indeed.
Now would be a good time for one of his 'friends' to gently take him
aside and have a soul searching talk.

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.


Only one thing to do. Let's all ignore him and his comments.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get along'?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

I sent him a very polite email. I recommended he use rec.boats as a place
to discuss boating and share his boating knowledge, and use another
newsgroup to have a flamefest. He didn't like my suggestion.




"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get along'?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.

010011110101010000111010
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:48:22 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:


010101000110111101101101001011000000110100001010 010010110
110000101110010011001010110111000100000011010010 111001100
100000011101110110111101110010011010110110100101 101110011
001110010000001100001011100110010000001101000011 000010111
001001100100001000000110000101110011001000000100 100001100
001011100100111001001111001001000000110100101110 011001000
000110100101101110001000000110011101100101011101 000111010
001101001011011100110011100001101000010100110000 101101110
001000000110000101110010011001110111010101101101 011001010
110111001110100001000000110011101101111011010010 110111001
100111001011100010000000100000010101000110100001 100101001
000000110101101101001011011100110010001100101011 100100010
000001100111011001010110111001110100011011000110 010101110
010001000000000110100001010011100100110010101100 011001011
100110001001101111011000010111010001110011001000 000110100
101110011001000000111010001101111011011110010000 001100010
011011110111001001101001011011100110011100100000 011001100
110111101110010001000000111010001101000011001010 110110100
10111000001101000010


No - it's not that at all. Some people can't do anything other than
criticize, complain and cut 'n paste issues to "prove" their points.

Karen actually did have something intelligent and on topic to say, but
she lost all credibility when she cut 'n paste what I said to prove
her point about FICHTS - it's very much akin to lying.

She is what she is - unimaginative, uncreative, uninspired, unoriginal
and bit with the green eyed jealousy bug.

Whoa there Tommy my ultra boring boy; you better do some cutting &
pasting of your own. You're the current OT queen & all I did was inject
some on topic for you, got any actual rejoinders on the boating subject???

Truly Tom you post machine code as if it is of interest to anyone in a
boating NG???

I assume it's your 1 in 3 failure admission that has upset you?????
well how do you count then??? Till recently you'd bought 3 fichts & one
had failed?? which is a pretty poor record?? I mean the dealers tried to
hide 1 in 5 it was so bad, I now point out that you've got yourself back
on par by buying 2 more so now you're at the worst they were prepared to
admit which is the dealer scary 1 in 5.

As for all the "uns" that's OK by me but of course I actually have the
runs on the board regarding the DFI engines & OMC was the case study
till the test dummy died:-)

So far all you do is spruik dealer BS in a deceptive & selfish attempt
to trap other unsuspecting boaters into the same trap you've boxed
yourself into; a failed engine system. Of course you'll deny same but
hey as I said, I have the proof.

Did you hear about the ficht failures exactly as we predicted within a
couple of months of their release, have you looked at the pathetic
attempts of E-tec not to even try to resolve the causes but to try to
build an engine strong enough to hold together a little longer with
special high melting point pistons, treated bores, special high temp
oil, new head fastening, new plumbing etc etc all not to address the
original still existing issue but feeble OMC style attempts to "live"
with it on other peoples' money!!

My original 98 OMC complaints remain, not enough injection pressure,
not enough atomisation, a mixture at power way too lean to be safe & a
suicidal lubrication system (although this has always been the standard
for any OMC based product:-)).

Anyway no need to thank me for trying to get your thread back on topic I
wasn't really expecting any:-) but hey at least the ultra boring machine
code went:-) Did I really type a treated bore above & not reference
you?? see kinder & nicer NG to a fault:-)

For the record the new improve NG doesn't mean I have to tolerate
endless OT threads nor mean I can't make on topic comments??? we've
gotten rid of the mindless political stuff now lets discuss the boating
subjects I'm always willing to say what I say about your E-Tec disaster
why are you so worried about it???

K

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:39:39 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"
wrote:

I sent him a very polite email. I recommended he use rec.boats as a place
to discuss boating and share his boating knowledge, and use another
newsgroup to have a flamefest. He didn't like my suggestion.





Ditto and ditto.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:39 -0500, " JimH" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.


Why? I'm assuming you're referring to Smithers. Why was it wrong for him to send an
email? Heck, I'd rather it be done by email than in the group.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that there
was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?



" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.

010011110101010000111010
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:39 -0500, " JimH" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:49 -0500, "Reggie Smithers"

wrote:

JohnH,
It looks like Harry has changed his bait.



Are you also sending Harry emails in an attempt to get him to 'get
along'?


I wasn't referring to you earlier, by the way. I was referring to
Smithers.


And in that case, he was wrong in doing so.


Why? I'm assuming you're referring to Smithers. Why was it wrong for him
to send an
email? Heck, I'd rather it be done by email than in the group.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Because Harry has stated repeatedly he is ignoring him. So why push the
issue by sending an email?

010011110101010000111010
 

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that
there was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?





Because he has stated many times he is ignoring you. You are just pushing
the issue by sending him an email when he apparently does not wish to
communicate with you.

JMHO.

010011110101010000111010
 

JimH,

You might be correct, this would not be the first time I have been wrong,
but when someone mentions my name numerous times a day, he really isn't
ignoring me and he really is communicating with me many times a day. I have
always thought personal discussions are better handled via email. In my
ignorance, I believed Harry would get bored of posting insults if we
communicated one on one. But, if Harry believes he will feel better by
calling me a droller or poser or whatever, isn't it better that he handles
that via email instead of the NG?

Since Harry has already mentioned my email I will repost it here (including
typos) to see if anyone considers my email inflammatory. :

Harry,
Since everyone in rec.boats (including Shortwavet Sportfishing, Eisboch,
Chuck Gould and Gene Keans have all asked you politely to take your
inflammatory comments and name calling to another newsgroup, why do you
continue to try to start flame wars?

Certainly there are lots of NG for you to have a flamefest. If you continue
to troll, the few who considered you a friend, will get tired of your
antics.

Just some friendly advice from a friend."

********* end of email. ***************

If I thought Harry would use my email as an attempt to start another
rec.boats trollfest, I would not have sent it. My email was a serious
attempt at putting Harry's and my silly battles behind us.

I am not sure you noticed I did something very similar with Basskisser/
Atl_Man ( I started calling him "Atl" and no longer call him the name he
doesn't like) and I mentioned a nice Atlanta restaurant he would enjoy.
Bassy responded in a friendly manner, so it can be effective.

As I said, I might be wrong, but my email was a serious attempt at putting
Harry's and my personal battles aside, or at the very least take them out of
rec.boats.






" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
...
JimH,
I am curious, why was it wrong to send a polite email to someone telling
them that their boating knowledge would be an asset to the NG and that
there was a ton of NGs one can go to have a flamefest?





Because he has stated many times he is ignoring you. You are just pushing
the issue by sending him an email when he apparently does not wish to
communicate with you.

JMHO.

010011110101010000111010
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote:

One last time - you have nothing, zero, nada - no knowledge of the
subject, no idea of what the technology is, no idea of the - well -
truth.

I believe you can tell a lot about a pleasure boater by looking at his
or her boat.

Got a picture of that fab 36-footer, Krause?

The first time I saw a photo of that P.O.S. boat of hers, I knew she was
a fraud. No real boater who dispenses "advise" as readily as Ms. Smith
would own a boat that was in as rotten shape as hers.

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

--
Skipper

010011110101010000111010
 

Skipper,
If we all ignore the non boating flames, we just might be able to get this
NG back on track.


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote:

One last time - you have nothing, zero, nada - no knowledge of the
subject, no idea of what the technology is, no idea of the - well -
truth.

I believe you can tell a lot about a pleasure boater by looking at his
or her boat.

Got a picture of that fab 36-footer, Krause?

The first time I saw a photo of that P.O.S. boat of hers, I knew she was
a fraud. No real boater who dispenses "advise" as readily as Ms. Smith
would own a boat that was in as rotten shape as hers.

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

--
Skipper

010011110101010000111010
 

Reggie Smithers wrote:

Karen is no fraud...but you are.

Skipper, If we all ignore the non boating flames, we just might be
able to get this NG back on track.

Agree Krause should be ignored.

--
Skipper