![]() |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
OK, Let's get some serious boat discussion going (per Chuck's end of
year challenge). The time has come to replace our ancient 24 ft I/O cuddy. Here are the specs: Maximum 26 ft LOA (not counting the swim platform). Max beam of 8 1/2 feet. Must have an enclosed head and some minimal galley and sleeping space. Must have a better than average ride through a chop, preferably best of class for a 26 ft cabin boat. Must have reasonable speed, capable of cruising at 24 to 26 kts in good conditions. Must have a reputation for decent quality and resale value. Anchor windlass preferred. Our leading candidate so far is a Sea Ray 260 Sundancer. Being a bit of a traditionalist, I'm not particularly in love with Sea Ray's styling, but it's less offensive than some, and the boat seems to fit in most other respects. Suggestions? |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
Wayne.B wrote: OK, Let's get some serious boat discussion going (per Chuck's end of year challenge). The time has come to replace our ancient 24 ft I/O cuddy. Here are the specs: Maximum 26 ft LOA (not counting the swim platform). Max beam of 8 1/2 feet. Must have an enclosed head and some minimal galley and sleeping space. Must have a better than average ride through a chop, preferably best of class for a 26 ft cabin boat. Must have reasonable speed, capable of cruising at 24 to 26 kts in good conditions. Must have a reputation for decent quality and resale value. Anchor windlass preferred. Our leading candidate so far is a Sea Ray 260 Sundancer. Being a bit of a traditionalist, I'm not particularly in love with Sea Ray's styling, but it's less offensive than some, and the boat seems to fit in most other respects. Suggestions? Here's a boat that meets your general specs. It was featured in the "At the Ramp" column in our magazine recently. I posted the text elsewhere, but here's a link if you're interested in checking it out. People love these, or hate them, but the LOA, the beam, the performance in chop, the cabin accommodations, etc are a clear fit. :-) http://groups.google.com/group/Pacif...08ca499259ded5 |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
Wayne,
There is only ONE boat that will meet your needs. All the rest will just be a compromise. http://tinyurl.com/crcxa The builder has the ideal combination of quality and value. "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... OK, Let's get some serious boat discussion going (per Chuck's end of year challenge). The time has come to replace our ancient 24 ft I/O cuddy. Here are the specs: Maximum 26 ft LOA (not counting the swim platform). Max beam of 8 1/2 feet. Must have an enclosed head and some minimal galley and sleeping space. Must have a better than average ride through a chop, preferably best of class for a 26 ft cabin boat. Must have reasonable speed, capable of cruising at 24 to 26 kts in good conditions. Must have a reputation for decent quality and resale value. Anchor windlass preferred. Our leading candidate so far is a Sea Ray 260 Sundancer. Being a bit of a traditionalist, I'm not particularly in love with Sea Ray's styling, but it's less offensive than some, and the boat seems to fit in most other respects. Suggestions? |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... OK, Let's get some serious boat discussion going (per Chuck's end of year challenge). The time has come to replace our ancient 24 ft I/O cuddy. Here are the specs: Maximum 26 ft LOA (not counting the swim platform). Max beam of 8 1/2 feet. Must have an enclosed head and some minimal galley and sleeping space. Must have a better than average ride through a chop, preferably best of class for a 26 ft cabin boat. Must have reasonable speed, capable of cruising at 24 to 26 kts in good conditions. Must have a reputation for decent quality and resale value. Anchor windlass preferred. Our leading candidate so far is a Sea Ray 260 Sundancer. Being a bit of a traditionalist, I'm not particularly in love with Sea Ray's styling, but it's less offensive than some, and the boat seems to fit in most other respects. Suggestions? The 260 SeaRay Sundancer, while meeting many of your needs, will not provide a nice ride nor will it be stable in even calm waters. Add to that the fact that it is a single I/O. Consider bumping up to the 270 Sundancer with twin V 6's, preferably 1986 through 1988 models. Engine access is tight but you get the bonus of an aft cabin and a more stable ride due partially to a wider beam (Sorry, but a bit wider than your 8'6" requirement). Regardless, both boats (1984-88 eras) offer solid glass construction and are stoutly built. Although SeaRay was purchased by Brunswick in the mid 1980's, their influence on design and construction was not apparent until 1989. Both the 260 and 270 come with Alpha 1 outdrives. Not especially great, especially in a salt water environment. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
Smithers one of 1000's wrote: Wayne, There is only ONE boat that will meet your needs. All the rest will just be a compromise. http://tinyurl.com/crcxa The builder has the ideal combination of quality and value. You're right about the "value" observation. At $53k it's relatively affordable, and for many weekend boaters it will prove to be as much boat as they will ever need. No, it won't blow away boats that sell for 30, 40, or 50% more in a tough head-to-head comparison test- but it remains true that you get a lot of bang for the buck with one of these. Philosophical question: Is a casual boating family as well or better off with a boat large enough to provide a comfortable (and adequately safe) cruising platform that may not be built to offshore standards as they would be with a "better boat" substantially smaller for the same money? Sometimes I think that a family is at least as well off in an "adequately built" 26-footer that meets their needs as they are in a bullet-proof 19-footer that doesn't. 75-90 percent of the boating done in the US is probably done in freshwater lakes. Is it the right boat for Wayne? Probably not fast enough or the best possible choice in choppy conditions. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
|
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:01:45 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
Wayne.B wrote: OK, Let's get some serious boat discussion going (per Chuck's end of year challenge). The time has come to replace our ancient 24 ft I/O cuddy. Here are the specs: Maximum 26 ft LOA (not counting the swim platform). Max beam of 8 1/2 feet. Must have an enclosed head and some minimal galley and sleeping space. Must have a better than average ride through a chop, preferably best of class for a 26 ft cabin boat. Must have reasonable speed, capable of cruising at 24 to 26 kts in good conditions. Must have a reputation for decent quality and resale value. Anchor windlass preferred. Our leading candidate so far is a Sea Ray 260 Sundancer. Being a bit of a traditionalist, I'm not particularly in love with Sea Ray's styling, but it's less offensive than some, and the boat seems to fit in most other respects. Suggestions? You want to buy my lightly used Parker 2520XL. It easily meets and exceeds all of your stated specifications. You need to give him an idea of the cost! -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
|
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:54:25 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Albemarles are okay boats, but woefully heavy and they roll a lot. Also, most of the smaller ones have that awful compromise, an I/O. ============================================ Rolling is the compromise you accept when you get a boat with a lot of deadrise. Weight and deadrise are what get you through rough water without pounding however. My old Bertram 33 had a wonderful ride, even on the open ocean, but it would roll your eyes out at anchor if you got caught sidways to the swell. I built a pair of west-coast type flopper stoppers for it and they helped quite a lot. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:36:09 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: If you want to go really fast in a rough ocean, though, it's hard to beat a true deep vee and well-anchored fillings in your teeth. ================================ That is not the primary goal but if the boat *can* do that, it will have a really nice ride everywhere else. Best of all are the speedboat hulls but then you loose the cabin space and enclosed head. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com