![]() |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:01:07 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote: Your GB is gorgeous, but GB type boats just aren't my style. Unfortunately, I have a need for speed. =================================== I guess we could put in a turbo. :-) |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:27:59 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: the POTUS sent me an invitation to a job I did not want. ================================= I think a lot of us got that one. Christmas 1964. Went to the wrong address, mom had remarried and moved. I was working in another state. Gave me a lead time, to go see Sgt. Higham of the USAF. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:10:06 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote: Heh. I was reading one of my zillion magazines the other day about a 62' Hatteras that was being built with twin 1200 hp turbocharged MAN 12 cylinder diesels - supposedly, it was able to do something like 50 mph. I can't imagine what the fuel bill would be. =================================== It's fairly easy to make some estimates. 2400 total hp, typically 2/3 at full cruise = 1600. Figure about 1 gph for every 17 hp = approx 95 gph. Estimating 30 kts cruising speed, approx 3.2 gals per nautical mile. Those are pretty typical numbers for big planing sport fish and motor yachts. It would certainly add a few dinero to the fuel bill for our 5,000+ NM this year. But if you're paying something like $2M for a boat like that, what's another $50K/yr for fuel I suppose. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
Here's my advice, based on several decades of boating.
Stay away from Bayliners. They're attractively styled and low priced, but don't get suckered in. They tend to be cheaply built, as is evidenced in little details like joints and fasteners. BOATING magazine did a review of a Bayliner Trophy, which is advertised as a rugged, offshore blue water fishing boat, and described the construction as "flimsy." Sport Fishing magazine said they were "good for inshore and protected waters." I know major boat dealers all up and down the Texas coast, and almost all of them refuse to take Bayliners as tradeins. They make their lot look cheap (ever see used Yugos sitting on a Mercedes lot?), and later when they fall apart their owners get ****ed off and bring them back, etc. I live and boat at a large (30,000 acres) recreational lake in central Texas. Many times I've watched a Bayliner pull up to a gas dock, and the gas boys would just sit there talking and ignore it, although they'd jump to their feet if anything else pulled up. Really. I'm not making this up. Once I was looking at a 21' Trophy cuddy in a Bayliner showroom. The piece of crap came with a 175HP Force. It'd probably do 20mph. I pressed on the side of the hull with the tip of my finger, and the outer layer of fiberglass "popped" in and out slightly with the pressure. I thumped it with the heel of my hand, and it was like thumping a shoebox. What a piece of crap. Try thumping the hull on my 12 year old Robalo sometime. It feels like concrete slab. Literally. Well, I could go on. If K-Mart sold boats, they'd be Bayliners. There are quite a few good boats out there these days, with modern manufacturing technology. Look for little features and details, like storage, seating, instrument protection, etc. as well as seaworthiness. One boat I can recommend in your category that's been around for years is an old standard, the Wellcraft Coastal. It's a proven veteran, rugged and seaworthy, and is well known for making clever, efficient use of space. Here's a link: http://www.wellcraft.com/Boats/Boats....asp?c=1&b=220 Another one is this 26' Robalo, if you're REALLY serious: http://www.robalo.com/265.htm Good luck. I envy you, going shopping for a new 26 footer. Not something you do every day! Ron M. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:57:38 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:10:06 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: Heh. I was reading one of my zillion magazines the other day about a 62' Hatteras that was being built with twin 1200 hp turbocharged MAN 12 cylinder diesels - supposedly, it was able to do something like 50 mph. I can't imagine what the fuel bill would be. =================================== It's fairly easy to make some estimates. 2400 total hp, typically 2/3 at full cruise = 1600. Figure about 1 gph for every 17 hp = approx 95 gph. Estimating 30 kts cruising speed, approx 3.2 gals per nautical mile. Those are pretty typical numbers for big planing sport fish and motor yachts. It would certainly add a few dinero to the fuel bill for our 5,000+ NM this year. But if you're paying something like $2M for a boat like that, what's another $50K/yr for fuel I suppose. I wasn't that far off - I figured somewhere around 4/5 gpnm. Sure would be nice though. A while back on I think the Travel Channel, was a show on super yachts. Guy built one with twin diesels and twin turbines. Was in I think the 140' range and he got it up to maybe 72 knots. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:05:25 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote: I wasn't that far off - I figured somewhere around 4/5 gpnm. Sure would be nice though. ========================== Oh for sure. Before we got the GB, one of the boats on our short list was a Hatt 55 sportfish with tower, outriggers, fighting chair and all the trimmings. Mrs B really liked it a lot which is an important part of the equation of course. It had a pair of DD 12V71 turbos and would cruise in the mid 20s which would be kind of nice. When we started working the the fuel consumption numbers however and looking at the maintenance costs on the big turbo engines, it quickly became clear that the boat would own us and not the other way around. Too bad, it was a nice one. Most of the other sportfish we looked at in the 45 to 50 ft range were just not big enough to live on comfortably for months at a time the way we did this summer. The GB is just unbeatable in that respect, and fuel economy is much more reasonable at about 1 gpm average. |
On Topic: Looking for boat recommendations
On 23 Dec 2005 07:33:48 -0800, "Ron M."
wrote: Good luck. I envy you, going shopping for a new 26 footer. Not something you do every day! ========================== True. We got a 49 footer last year after selling a nice Bertram 33. We're working our way down now. :-) Thanks for the information, I'll follow up. I view Bayliners as a fresh water entry level boat, OK for the purpose they serve, but not the right boat for here. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com