|
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9nyt.htm
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE Fri Dec 16 200 11:27:16 ET **Exclusive** Newspaper fails to inform readers "news break" is tied to book publication On the front page of today's NEW YORK TIMES, national security reporter James Risen claims that "months after the September 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States... without the court approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials." Risen claims the White House asked the paper not to publish the article, saying that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. Risen claims the TIMES delayed publication of the article for a year to conduct additional reporting. But now comes word James Risen's article is only one of many "explosive newsbreaking" stories that can be found -- in his upcoming book -- which he turned in 3 months ago! The paper failed to reveal the urgent story was tied to a book release and sale. "STATE OF WAR: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration" is to be published by FREE PRESS in the coming weeks, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. Carisa Hays, VP, Director of Publicity FREE PRESS, confirms the book is being published. The book editor of Bush critic Richard Clarke [AGAINST ALL ENEMIES] signed Risen to FREE PRESS. Developing... |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
The major media outlets have become nothing more than the propaganda arm of
the DNC. "Mule" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9nyt.htm NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE Fri Dec 16 200 11:27:16 ET **Exclusive** Newspaper fails to inform readers "news break" is tied to book publication On the front page of today's NEW YORK TIMES, national security reporter James Risen claims that "months after the September 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States... without the court approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials." Risen claims the White House asked the paper not to publish the article, saying that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. Risen claims the TIMES delayed publication of the article for a year to conduct additional reporting. But now comes word James Risen's article is only one of many "explosive newsbreaking" stories that can be found -- in his upcoming book -- which he turned in 3 months ago! The paper failed to reveal the urgent story was tied to a book release and sale. "STATE OF WAR: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration" is to be published by FREE PRESS in the coming weeks, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. Carisa Hays, VP, Director of Publicity FREE PRESS, confirms the book is being published. The book editor of Bush critic Richard Clarke [AGAINST ALL ENEMIES] signed Risen to FREE PRESS. Developing... |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
I expect there'll be some reports of collusion with the Democrats in the Senate also. Too
coincidental that this story, several years old, broke the day the Senate voted to stop the Patriot Act filibuster. On 16 Dec 2005 11:28:15 -0800, "Mule" wrote: http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9nyt.htm NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE Fri Dec 16 200 11:27:16 ET **Exclusive** Newspaper fails to inform readers "news break" is tied to book publication On the front page of today's NEW YORK TIMES, national security reporter James Risen claims that "months after the September 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States... without the court approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials." Risen claims the White House asked the paper not to publish the article, saying that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. Risen claims the TIMES delayed publication of the article for a year to conduct additional reporting. But now comes word James Risen's article is only one of many "explosive newsbreaking" stories that can be found -- in his upcoming book -- which he turned in 3 months ago! The paper failed to reveal the urgent story was tied to a book release and sale. "STATE OF WAR: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration" is to be published by FREE PRESS in the coming weeks, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. Carisa Hays, VP, Director of Publicity FREE PRESS, confirms the book is being published. The book editor of Bush critic Richard Clarke [AGAINST ALL ENEMIES] signed Risen to FREE PRESS. Developing... -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:30:31 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
JohnH wrote: I expect there'll be some reports of collusion with the Democrats in the Senate also. Too coincidental that this story, several years old, broke the day the Senate voted to stop the Patriot Act filibuster. Actually, there was no filibuster. There was a threat of a filibuster. The unPatriot Act stinks, and for the moment at least, some Senators realize that. I hear Fritz changed his vote at the end so he could regurgitate it next year. This, by the way, is an example of what I meant by good things happening when Bush is down in the polls. You are correct. The vote was to stop the debate. Fritz changed his vote to correct it, but emphasized that the debate would continue. -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:46:17 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:30:31 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: I expect there'll be some reports of collusion with the Democrats in the Senate also. Too coincidental that this story, several years old, broke the day the Senate voted to stop the Patriot Act filibuster. Actually, there was no filibuster. There was a threat of a filibuster. The unPatriot Act stinks, and for the moment at least, some Senators realize that. I hear Fritz changed his vote at the end so he could regurgitate it next year. This, by the way, is an example of what I meant by good things happening when Bush is down in the polls. You are correct. The vote was to stop the debate. Fritz changed his vote to correct it, but emphasized that the debate would continue. -- John Herring Five Republicans joined the call for real debate and so the Bush thug push to short-circuit Patriot Act reform was soundly defeated in a Senate vote today. This vote paves the way for a bipartisan filibuster to restore checks and balances and protect the freedoms of innocent Americans. The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. Note that is wasn't a filibuster, it was, and still is, a debate. -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
wrote in message oups.com... JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) Yeah, imagine anyone winning by a mere 3.5 million votes calling it a rout. LOL! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
Chuck
You must read completely different newspapers or read completely different essays than I do. I don't think I read any such comments, even by partisans in rec.boats. wrote in message oups.com... JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
Harry,
Why did the independent exit polls match the election results? Is it possible that you are losing it? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: wrote in message oups.com... JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) Yeah, imagine anyone winning by a mere 3.5 million votes calling it a rout. LOL! Diebold. Nothing more. -- George W. Bush: American Nero. |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
|
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
Definitely not the latter!
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:02:52 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote: JohnH, GMTA or is that FMTA? "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
Then it must be GMTA.
"JohnH" wrote in message ... Definitely not the latter! On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:02:52 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote: JohnH, GMTA or is that FMTA? "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
I can't believe Harry is saying I'm telling lies about him. Now I feel bad. I'm thinking of changing
my name to Don. On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:09:02 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote: Then it must be GMTA. "JohnH" wrote in message .. . Definitely not the latter! On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:02:52 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote: JohnH, GMTA or is that FMTA? "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
JohnH wrote: On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring "Rout": columnist Randall Nunn, American Daily, one of a bunch in the search engine "Repudiation": The results are a repudiation of Kerry, the first Catholic nominated for president since 1960. Kerry's support of abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell ... http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nation ... ics/2002084916_catholic08.html , one of a bunch in the search engine. I'll let you sleuth out vindication and overwhelming. Easily done. Sorry, but I didn't see your question about the New Year's resolutions. There are too many posts to read them all, especially since most of them are just volleys in the name calling and pig piling wars. |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
On 16 Dec 2005 20:24:32 -0800, wrote:
JohnH wrote: On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring "Rout": columnist Randall Nunn, American Daily, one of a bunch in the search engine "Repudiation": The results are a repudiation of Kerry, the first Catholic nominated for president since 1960. Kerry's support of abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell ... http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nation ... ics/2002084916_catholic08.html , one of a bunch in the search engine. I'll let you sleuth out vindication and overwhelming. Easily done. Sorry, but I didn't see your question about the New Year's resolutions. There are too many posts to read them all, especially since most of them are just volleys in the name calling and pig piling wars. Yes, it's the name-calling and pig-piling that should be stopped. Wayne suggested that it might be part of a New Year's resolution. Sounds like a pretty good idea. As to the rest, I guess you're right - standards change! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ....and your New Year even Better! |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
JohnH wrote: On 16 Dec 2005 20:24:32 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: On 16 Dec 2005 18:30:05 -0800, wrote: JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) There you are! Why didn't you address my question New Year's resolutions? I don't recall the words 'rout', 'total repudiation', 'vindication', 'overwhelming' being used. Could you show me? -- John Herring "Rout": columnist Randall Nunn, American Daily, one of a bunch in the search engine "Repudiation": The results are a repudiation of Kerry, the first Catholic nominated for president since 1960. Kerry's support of abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell ... http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nation ... ics/2002084916_catholic08.html , one of a bunch in the search engine. I'll let you sleuth out vindication and overwhelming. Easily done. Sorry, but I didn't see your question about the New Year's resolutions. There are too many posts to read them all, especially since most of them are just volleys in the name calling and pig piling wars. Yes, it's the name-calling and pig-piling that should be stopped. Wayne suggested that it might be part of a New Year's resolution. Sounds like a pretty good idea. As to the rest, I guess you're right - standards change! -- John Herring May your Christmas be Spectacular! ...and your New Year even Better! The only way for name calling and "side-choosing" (aka pig piling) to stop will be for each one of us to consciously avoid participating in it and by attempting to ignore those who do. I see little hope of this ever happening in rec.boats. Our most prolific poster freely admits that he enjoys stirring up the "right wing trash", and he has a whole crew of people who spend entire weekends hovering over their keyboards waiting for him to post anything at all so they can call him a "liar", (and worse). There is so little boating content here, as a direct result of the abuses by Harry, Smithers, Gould, NOYB, Hertvik, Herring, Basskisser, Bert, Jack Goff, JPS, and of course the reanimated Skipper that the group is irretrievably in the toilet. Most of the folks in the above list are off topic at least 90% of the time. When "Harry Krause is a.............." threads get 200 or 300 posts and a boating thread gets 2 or 3, trying to maintain any facade that this is a boating group is certainly ridiculous.was the last time a new personality showed up in the group (aside from one of Smithers' 1000 aliases) and stayed for more than a couple of days? What does that tell us about what the group has become? Even scarier, what does that tell us about those of us who seem to flourish in the daily exchange of crappy personal remarks and the endless resurrection of old fights based on something (or the misrepresentation of something) that was posted, in many cases, several years ago? As long as Harry's hobby is stirring up his fan club, and as long as there are a dozen people here for no other reason than to pitch Harry a bunch of crap everyday, the NG is toast. It would take a group of adults to break the cycle. It doesn't even take 100 percent participation- but the first step would probably have to involve certain individuals reaching decisions that their behavior in the group will be determined by their own conscious choices rather than by involuntary reactions to something posted by some "commie, pinko liberal" or "conservatrash". |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
|
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
Skipper wrote: Do you have a final solution to the Harry Krause infestation? -- Skipper I have a Crescent wrench solution. One size fits all infestations from any source, (sort of). While many people like to dump all the blame on Harry, there is plenty to go around. Your skirts are not entirely clean, nor are mine, nor are many others'. Consider the following parable: A man visited his doctor to complain, "Doc, every time I raise my arm above my shoulder, it hurts like hell!" The doctor said, "Well, that's easy, just don't raise your arm above your shoulder." If every time somebody responds to a troll in rec.boats the group goes to hell, then the anwer is easy. Nothing looks more lonesome or more foolish than a troll that nobody is responding to. If you think Harry is a troll, don't respond. I am making a not-always-entirely successful effort to control my own responses to trolls, stay out of ****ing matches, and avoid name calling. I believe that there are other people in this group specifically *to* engage in that sort of behavior, but it is not my place or right to judge them or demand that they change their ways. If I control my own destiny and don't let other people determine what my reactionary behavior "has to be", the group will be a little bit better than if I go out of my way to pick fights, call names, start attack threads, join in a pig pile, etc. If one or two other people also try to stay out of fights, avoid name calling, avoid pig piling, and refrain from launching attack threads then the group gets better yet. None of us can decide what the "group" will do, nor can/should we wait for the group to modify its behavior before we take responsibility for our own. At least that's my opinion, as requested, and its an attitude that might work to take the group back from the brink of extinction. Things are currently about as bad as they have ever been in the NG, and far, far worse than the recent average. Too bad, IMO. Have a pleasant Saturday, I'll be off to help my Mom celebrate her 75th birthday tomorrow. |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
" JimH" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... JohnH wrote: The vote was 53 to 47. Seven short of the 60 needed. "Soundly defeated" indeed. ROTFLMAO........if memory serves me well, a national vote decided by the same percentage, just thirteen months ago, was a "Rout!" a "Mandate" a "Total Repudiation of Moderates and Liberals"......... "Vindication for Bush, Limbaugh, and the Conservative Agenda," "An overhwelming stamp of approval for the war in Iraq"......... yada, yada, yada funny how standards change, :-) Yeah, imagine anyone winning by a mere 3.5 million votes calling it a rout. LOL! Of course the liebrals called clinton's victory with less than 50% of the vote a "mandate" LMAO |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
|
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Smithers wrote:
Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? -- Skipper |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Who me?
"Skipper" wrote in message ... Smithers wrote: Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? -- Skipper |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Smithers wrote:
"Skipper" wrote in message... Smithers wrote: Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? Who me? Suspect we'd both like to see the NG recover. -- Skipper |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
"Skipper" wrote in message ... Smithers wrote: "Skipper" wrote in message... Smithers wrote: Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? Who me? Suspect we'd both like to see the NG recover. -- Skipper Good morning Skipper. No offense, but...................when you came back to this NG and spent week after week riding and belittling Chuck, was that a sign that you would like to see this NG recover? |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Skipper,
It would be nice, and it is risk free. All NG have OT threads, and minor flame wars, but when 90% of new posts are OT trolls, it is recipe for disaster. If people can stop the OT trolling, and others can ignore them when they pop up, rec.boats might be able to make a come back. In any case, it would be interesting to see if it is possible. "Skipper" wrote in message ... Smithers wrote: "Skipper" wrote in message... Smithers wrote: Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? Who me? Suspect we'd both like to see the NG recover. -- Skipper |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:27:46 -0500, " JimH" wrote:
"Skipper" wrote in message ... Smithers wrote: "Skipper" wrote in message... Smithers wrote: Harry, It would be interesting to see posting on topic posts instead of your OT trolls. I commend you Harry. Why are you responding to his OT post? Who me? Suspect we'd both like to see the NG recover. -- Skipper Good morning Skipper. No offense, but...................when you came back to this NG and spent week after week riding and belittling Chuck, was that a sign that you would like to see this NG recover? No offense, but the past is the past. With his reference to 'pigs', Harry's response to Chuck was an obvious troll. I wouldn't mind seeing the NG recover, but responding to *anything* Harry says is not going to help it. -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
NYT 'SPYING' SPLASH TIED TO BOOK RELEASE
|
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:42:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: That means, of course, that I will not be responding to certain posters here and, once I get my filters up and running again, I hopefully won't see much of their excrement. We'll give it a shot and see what happens. ======================= I think you'll be pleasantly surprised but it will take some resolve on everyone's part. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:42:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: That means, of course, that I will not be responding to certain posters here and, once I get my filters up and running again, I hopefully won't see much of their excrement. We'll give it a shot and see what happens. ======================= I think you'll be pleasantly surprised but it will take some resolve on everyone's part. Maybe. I've got most of the garbage filtered, and it's easy enough to add to the filter database. We'll see. Your "filtering" won't last a week! You won't be able to stand not reading what everyone else is posting. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:42:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: That means, of course, that I will not be responding to certain posters here and, once I get my filters up and running again, I hopefully won't see much of their excrement. We'll give it a shot and see what happens. ======================= I think you'll be pleasantly surprised but it will take some resolve on everyone's part. Maybe. I've got most of the garbage filtered, and it's easy enough to add to the filter database. We'll see. Your "filtering" won't last a week! You won't be able to stand not reading what everyone else is posting. "The other "punishment" narcissists mete out is banishing you from their glorious presence" "The narcissist expects that you will be devastated by the withdrawal of her/his divine attention, so that after a while -- a few weeks or months (i.e., the next time the narcissist needs to use you for something) -- the narcissist will expect you to have learned your lesson and be eager to return to the fold. If you have learned your lesson" "They can't see that they have a problem; it's always somebody else who has the problem and needs to change" |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:50:16 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:42:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: That means, of course, that I will not be responding to certain posters here and, once I get my filters up and running again, I hopefully won't see much of their excrement. We'll give it a shot and see what happens. ======================= I think you'll be pleasantly surprised but it will take some resolve on everyone's part. Maybe. I've got most of the garbage filtered, and it's easy enough to add to the filter database. We'll see. Your "filtering" won't last a week! You won't be able to stand not reading what everyone else is posting. Let's give it a chance. It can't *hurt* anything! -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:55:25 -0500, "P Fritz" wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:42:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: That means, of course, that I will not be responding to certain posters here and, once I get my filters up and running again, I hopefully won't see much of their excrement. We'll give it a shot and see what happens. ======================= I think you'll be pleasantly surprised but it will take some resolve on everyone's part. Maybe. I've got most of the garbage filtered, and it's easy enough to add to the filter database. We'll see. Your "filtering" won't last a week! You won't be able to stand not reading what everyone else is posting. "The other "punishment" narcissists mete out is banishing you from their glorious presence" "The narcissist expects that you will be devastated by the withdrawal of her/his divine attention, so that after a while -- a few weeks or months (i.e., the next time the narcissist needs to use you for something) -- the narcissist will expect you to have learned your lesson and be eager to return to the fold. If you have learned your lesson" "They can't see that they have a problem; it's always somebody else who has the problem and needs to change" None of us has to change, except for not taking the bait when he puts out his trolls. He's stated over and over his intentions here, which are to fight with conservatives. His sig line is just another example of same. -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:48:24 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Maybe. I've got most of the garbage filtered, and it's easy enough to add to the filter database. We'll see. -- Clinton and Monica; W and Iraq: Which is harder to swallow? =============================== If you are truly serious about this "experiment" I would respectfully suggest that you abstain from adding your little sig line zingers like "Clinton and Monica" above. Some are funny but almost all are viewed as inflammatory in some way, that particular one in poor taste at the very least, and do a lot to perpetuate hostilities here. You can't take pot shots at others without expecting the brick coming back over the wall. If that's your goal, then you have defined yourself as part of the problem, not part of the solution. /end lecture |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Harry cannot help it, he just keeps proving he has a problem
"The other "punishment" narcissists mete out is banishing you from their glorious presence" "The narcissist expects that you will be devastated by the withdrawal of her/his divine attention, so that after a while -- a few weeks or months (i.e., the next time the narcissist needs to use you for something) -- the narcissist will expect you to have learned your lesson and be eager to return to the fold. If you have learned your lesson" "They can't see that they have a problem; it's always somebody else who has the problem and needs to change" "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote in message . .. Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite. "Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
Paul,
Let's not add to the problem. I think it will be very interesting to see what would happen if people didn't bite when other people went trolling. Sometimes it is very hard not to, but it really would be interest to see the reaction when the trolling doing get any bite. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... Harry cannot help it, he just keeps proving he has a problem "The other "punishment" narcissists mete out is banishing you from their glorious presence" "The narcissist expects that you will be devastated by the withdrawal of her/his divine attention, so that after a while -- a few weeks or months (i.e., the next time the narcissist needs to use you for something) -- the narcissist will expect you to have learned your lesson and be eager to return to the fold. If you have learned your lesson" "They can't see that they have a problem; it's always somebody else who has the problem and needs to change" "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote in message . .. Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite. "Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:28:18 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote:
Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. I wonder if Wayne and Chuck notice that? -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
"Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote in message . .. Paul, Let's not add to the problem. I think it will be very interesting to see what would happen if people didn't bite when other people went trolling. Sometimes it is very hard not to, but it really would be interest to see the reaction when the trolling is not effective. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... Harry cannot help it, he just keeps proving he has a problem "The other "punishment" narcissists mete out is banishing you from their glorious presence" "The narcissist expects that you will be devastated by the withdrawal of her/his divine attention, so that after a while -- a few weeks or months (i.e., the next time the narcissist needs to use you for something) -- the narcissist will expect you to have learned your lesson and be eager to return to the fold. If you have learned your lesson" "They can't see that they have a problem; it's always somebody else who has the problem and needs to change" "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote in message . .. Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite. "Harry Krause" wrote in message . .. Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. |
Hey, Chuck, Gene, Wayne, et al
JohnH,
It must be cold as hell up there. Any snow yet? "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:28:18 -0500, "Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote: Remember, when Harry makes a post like this he is trolling, don't bite. "Harry Krause" wrote in message m... Wayne.B wrote: My guess is that even if I don't engage them directly or indirectly, the garbage cannot help itself, and it will continue in its snarly, smelly ways. I'll excise some of them for a while, though. Or at least think about it. I wonder if Wayne and Chuck notice that? -- John H **** May your Christmas be Spectacular!**** *****...and your New Year even Better!***** |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com