On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:56:47 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:27:09 -0500, Netsock wrote:

Certainly. Wanna compare expertise?

No thanks...you have already clearly demonstrated your knowledge on
the subject.

But anyway, you should know in the absence of pressure, the journals
would ride more on the bearings, thus causing more wear.

If you own the lab, you certainly should own the results. Shouldn't
you?

I didn't own the lab.

Less than 1%.


That is total BS even for you! In order for you to even SEE any oil
pressure at 1%, oil pressure would have to lead RPM.... and on this
planet (Earth) that isn't going to happen.

As soon as the turbine starts spinning, the oil pump starts pumping.
At that point, there is measurable oil pressure. BTW, 1% is equal to
approximately 200 rpm.

But then turbines run forever between oil
changes, don't they!

No.

You obviously haven't been paying attention. Think SOAP.

And you obviously don't know what you are talking about...

The manufacture/builder cites a change interval for the oil, so
again...no...turbines do not "run forever between oil
changes"...whatever that exactly means anyway.

Wonder why?

No. I know why.

You deny and then comprehend same?

With your first statement being incorrect, the point is moot, however,
if you need explanation, I will be happy to do so...

"No" I don't "wonder why", because I already know why.

Got it now?

Its not a position of support...its fact.

Gosh, that's what Jax said!

Then he's a smart man. Like I said Gene, I have read the results, and
have seen the wear with my own eyes.

Frankly, for as smart as you put yourself off here, I'm surprised at
your lack of grasp on the issue. But hey...to each their own.

Take care Gene.
__

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."

http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/