Better *Defensive* Handgun
 

JohnH,
Harry believes if he cowers in the shadows responding to all of my posts 2nd
hand, that he is not obsessed. Harry is obsessed with me and every other
conservative in here. The difference is he is scared of me.



"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:18:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:34:19 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The
fastest and most accurate Gun in the World wrote:

Harry,
I really don't care if I "engage you" or not.

===================================

If you change your mind, please be sure to invite all of us to the
party.

Hopefully there will be no offspring fron this union.


You have to wonder about Smithers. If he posts 20 times a day here,
typically 15 of those posts are either about me or aimed in my direction
to see if he can provoke some sort of direct response. Yet, no matter
what he does or says, he gets no response.

He's more than a tad obsessed with me, I suppose. Does that make him the
"Son of Tuuk"?

Was not this post of yours written in response to Reggie?
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!

Better *Defensive* Handgun
 

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:10:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:18:58 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:34:19 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The
fastest and most accurate Gun in the World wrote:

Harry,
I really don't care if I "engage you" or not.
===================================

If you change your mind, please be sure to invite all of us to the
party.

Hopefully there will be no offspring fron this union.

You have to wonder about Smithers. If he posts 20 times a day here,
typically 15 of those posts are either about me or aimed in my direction
to see if he can provoke some sort of direct response. Yet, no matter
what he does or says, he gets no response.

He's more than a tad obsessed with me, I suppose. Does that make him the
"Son of Tuuk"?

Was not this post of yours written in response to Reggie?
--
John Herring



No, John, it is a response to Wayne.

So, if you hadn't been reading any of Smither's posts you would have written the same thing to
Wayne?

(Surely this isn't going right over your head?)
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!

Better *Defensive* Handgun
 

JohnH,
Harry has given up his charade about having me filtered, but he still feels
it is safer to respond 2nd hand to all of my posts. Considering Harry's
limited capacity, I can understand why he does.


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:10:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:18:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:34:19 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The
fastest and most accurate Gun in the World wrote:

Harry,
I really don't care if I "engage you" or not.
===================================

If you change your mind, please be sure to invite all of us to the
party.

Hopefully there will be no offspring fron this union.

You have to wonder about Smithers. If he posts 20 times a day here,
typically 15 of those posts are either about me or aimed in my
direction
to see if he can provoke some sort of direct response. Yet, no matter
what he does or says, he gets no response.

He's more than a tad obsessed with me, I suppose. Does that make him
the
"Son of Tuuk"?

Was not this post of yours written in response to Reggie?
--
John Herring



No, John, it is a response to Wayne.

So, if you hadn't been reading any of Smither's posts you would have
written the same thing to
Wayne?

(Surely this isn't going right over your head?)
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!

Better *Defensive* Handgun
 

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:58:30 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The fastest and most accurate Gun in
the World wrote:

JohnH,
Harry has given up his charade about having me filtered, but he still feels
it is safer to respond 2nd hand to all of my posts. Considering Harry's
limited capacity, I can understand why he does.


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:10:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:18:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:34:19 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The
fastest and most accurate Gun in the World wrote:

Harry,
I really don't care if I "engage you" or not.
===================================

If you change your mind, please be sure to invite all of us to the
party.

Hopefully there will be no offspring fron this union.

You have to wonder about Smithers. If he posts 20 times a day here,
typically 15 of those posts are either about me or aimed in my
direction
to see if he can provoke some sort of direct response. Yet, no matter
what he does or says, he gets no response.

He's more than a tad obsessed with me, I suppose. Does that make him
the
"Son of Tuuk"?

Was not this post of yours written in response to Reggie?
--
John Herring



No, John, it is a response to Wayne.

So, if you hadn't been reading any of Smither's posts you would have
written the same thing to
Wayne?

(Surely this isn't going right over your head?)
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!


In the spirit of Christmas, I'm being nice to Harry. Haven't you noticed? I've called him no names,
made no comments about the veracity of his comments, not tried to convert him, or sent him a
Christmas present (which would be the *worst* thing I could do).
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!