Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

JimH,

Jesus was not interested in creating a new religion. His idea was to bring
about a change in the Jewish faith, and he was open to allowing non Jews to
be part of this change. Christianity originally was Jews who followed the
teachings of Christ. When the Jews were resistant to the change, the
followers of Christ pulled away from Judaism and actively sought gentiles to
join their movement of following the teachings of Christ.

This is from the bible.


" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Then why do you keep snipping it?

I'm performing a public service.

The reality is, Christmas itself is a canard, a holiday
that only by convention is celebrated on the 25th of December. The date
itself has nothing to do with the man now called Jesus. What you are
celebrating is a holiday created from whole cloth by Constantine the
Great in the fourth century. He picked the same date as an existing
pagan festival.

Jesus, a pious Jewish man, probably would have disdained the holiday
named for him via a name that was not his.

Probably not Harry.

Really, and what you base that on? Your extensive knowledge of first
century pious Jews?


A more reliable source than you base your BS on.

Merry Christmas Harry.

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

Correction: Jesus really did not want to preach to Gentiles, his message
was for the chosen people, the Jews.


"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor.
wrote in message ...
JimH,

Jesus was not interested in creating a new religion. His idea was to
bring about a change in the Jewish faith, and he was open to allowing non
Jews to be part of this change. Christianity originally was Jews who
followed the teachings of Christ. When the Jews were resistant to the
change, the followers of Christ pulled away from Judaism and actively
sought gentiles to join their movement of following the teachings of
Christ.

This is from the bible.


" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Then why do you keep snipping it?

I'm performing a public service.

The reality is, Christmas itself is a canard, a holiday
that only by convention is celebrated on the 25th of December. The
date itself has nothing to do with the man now called Jesus. What you
are celebrating is a holiday created from whole cloth by Constantine
the Great in the fourth century. He picked the same date as an
existing pagan festival.

Jesus, a pious Jewish man, probably would have disdained the holiday
named for him via a name that was not his.

Probably not Harry.

Really, and what you base that on? Your extensive knowledge of first
century pious Jews?


A more reliable source than you base your BS on.

Merry Christmas Harry.

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Harry Krause is the kind of person who defended Stalin. The same type
of person defended the mass firing squads of Che Guevara. His type
defended the Khmer Rouge as being simply "overenthusiastic
revolutionaries". Now he defends Saddam and the PRC. He has too
because the blood on his hands simply will not come off.


You really and truly are retarded. No one in this newsgroup has posted
more strongly against the PRC than I have.

Only because they haven't allowed labor unions!

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

I remember when Harry used to degrade anyone who purchased Japanese
products. He said all products made in Japan should have a label saying
"From the people who brought you Pearl Harbor". Harry is very flexible and
blows which ever way the DNC tells him to blow.


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Harry Krause is the kind of person who defended Stalin. The same type
of person defended the mass firing squads of Che Guevara. His type
defended the Khmer Rouge as being simply "overenthusiastic
revolutionaries". Now he defends Saddam and the PRC. He has too
because the blood on his hands simply will not come off.


You really and truly are retarded. No one in this newsgroup has posted
more strongly against the PRC than I have.

Only because they haven't allowed labor unions!

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

I'm performing a public service.

The reality is, Christmas itself is a canard, a holiday
that only by convention is celebrated on the 25th of December. The date
itself has nothing to do with the man now called Jesus. What you are
celebrating is a holiday created from whole cloth by Constantine the Great
in the fourth century. He picked the same date as an existing pagan
festival.

Jesus, a pious Jewish man, probably would have disdained the holiday named
for him via a name that was not his.




This is so funny! Where did you read this? I love it how people re-write
history all the time.

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
.. .

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No, dummy, I'm not. I'm suggesting that the government in this country
is sometimes no different than the government in the PRC. It kills
people when there is no reason for it.
Harry, you need to do some research into this incident. I do believe the
shootings were justified. The police were shooting in self defense
against
people tossing fire bombs at them and attacking with machete type weapons.
This is easily verified with the reports by the independent news agencies
there, including your own government's agency who reported it for Radio
Free
Asia.

Jim C.



So the Kent State protesters who threw dangerous rocks, were also justified
in being shot down?

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim Carter wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
ups.com...
Anybody else notice how the corrupt liberal media has failed to report
on the massacre going on in China right now? Of course they wont
report it because this would tarnish the image of the system they love
so much.
I checked with a source, in Asia, and found that only two were killed
and
several wounded. It seems that the villagers attacked the police and
some
resisted arrest while others were prepared to "fire bomb" the police.

Perhaps the killings were justified????


And you argued the same justification for Kent State? They were
throwing
rocks. Thats dangerous.
I argued for the same justification for Kent State???? When did I do
that???

Jim C.



Several of the righties here, McKee among them, are not what may be
described as "careful readers." Worse, they'll take one statement of yours
(or mine, or anyone else they disagree with) and try to portmanteau it
with a boxful of disparate thoughts or ideas and accuse you of something
you never thought of or considered.

It's the kind of crap that's played on Faux News.




You seem to lack a logical mind, both of you. You say it was justified that
the protestors were shot because they were throwing dangerous items. So the
Kent State protestors were also throwing dangerous items. Therefore, you
also approve of the Kent State shootings.

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

Bill,
I don't believe the protestors deserved to be shot, but when I hear people
placing the blame for the tragedy entirely on the National Guard, it makes
me sick. Those guys were scared to death, and the protestors were doing
their best to make sure they stayed scared.


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
k.net...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
.. .

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No, dummy, I'm not. I'm suggesting that the government in this country
is sometimes no different than the government in the PRC. It kills
people when there is no reason for it.
Harry, you need to do some research into this incident. I do believe
the
shootings were justified. The police were shooting in self defense
against
people tossing fire bombs at them and attacking with machete type
weapons.
This is easily verified with the reports by the independent news agencies
there, including your own government's agency who reported it for Radio
Free
Asia.

Jim C.



So the Kent State protesters who threw dangerous rocks, were also
justified in being shot down?

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

"Lord Reginald Smithers" The fastest and most accurate Gun in the World
wrote in message ...
Bill,
I don't believe the protestors deserved to be shot, but when I hear people
placing the blame for the tragedy entirely on the National Guard, it makes
me sick. Those guys were scared to death, and the protestors were doing
their best to make sure they stayed scared.


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
k.net...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
.. .

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No, dummy, I'm not. I'm suggesting that the government in this country
is sometimes no different than the government in the PRC. It kills
people when there is no reason for it.
Harry, you need to do some research into this incident. I do believe
the
shootings were justified. The police were shooting in self defense
against
people tossing fire bombs at them and attacking with machete type
weapons.
This is easily verified with the reports by the independent news
agencies
there, including your own government's agency who reported it for Radio
Free
Asia.

Jim C.



So the Kent State protesters who threw dangerous rocks, were also
justified in being shot down?




The protestors did not deserve to be shot at. 4 unarmed student protestors
were killed, 9 wounded. I don't care if rocks were being thrown.

The blame goes to James Rhodes, governor of Ohio at the time, who sent in
the National Guard and to General Canterbury who ordered the Guard members
to lock and load their weapons. The rest is history and tragic.

Corrupt liberal media fails to cover the news
 

" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Lord Reginald Smithers" The fastest and most accurate Gun in the World
wrote in message ...
Bill,
I don't believe the protestors deserved to be shot, but when I hear
people placing the blame for the tragedy entirely on the National Guard,
it makes me sick. Those guys were scared to death, and the protestors
were doing their best to make sure they stayed scared.


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
k.net...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
.. .

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No, dummy, I'm not. I'm suggesting that the government in this country
is sometimes no different than the government in the PRC. It kills
people when there is no reason for it.
Harry, you need to do some research into this incident. I do believe
the
shootings were justified. The police were shooting in self defense
against
people tossing fire bombs at them and attacking with machete type
weapons.
This is easily verified with the reports by the independent news
agencies
there, including your own government's agency who reported it for Radio
Free
Asia.

Jim C.



So the Kent State protesters who threw dangerous rocks, were also
justified in being shot down?




The protestors did not deserve to be shot at. 4 unarmed student
protestors were killed, 9 wounded. I don't care if rocks were being
thrown.

The blame goes to James Rhodes, governor of Ohio at the time, who sent in
the National Guard and to General Canterbury who ordered the Guard members
to lock and load their weapons. The rest is history and tragic.


But Harry and JimC say the Chinese deserved to be shot as they were tossing
things.