![]() |
|
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Florida: Some see disdain in move to use eminent domain Florida officials want to relocate 6,000 in blue-collar Riviera Beach to build a waterfront complex across from high-dollar Palm Beach. John-Thor Dahlburg, Los Angeles Times Last update: December 6, 2005 at 10:44 PM Printer friendly E-mail this story Nation Twin Cities flights to eastern cities delayed Wisconsin schools facing lawsuits over 'holiday' programs 'Doozy of a snowstorm' descends on Northeast Gold coins among surprises showing up in Salvation Army kettles Storms bring snow, freezing cold to middle of country Page: 1 2 RIVIERA BEACH, FLA. - It's across the inlet from Palm Beach, but this town -- mostly black and blue-collar, with a large industrial and warehouse district -- could be a continent away from the Fortune 500 and Rolls-Royce set. But Riviera Beach's fortunes may soon change. In what has been called the largest eminent-domain case in the nation, the mayor and other elected leaders want to move about 6,000 residents, tear down their houses and use the emptied 400-acre site to build a waterfront yachting and residential complex for the well-to-do. The goal, Mayor Michael D. Brown said during a public meeting in September, is to "forever change the landscape" in this municipality of about 32,500. The $1 billion plan should generate jobs and move Riviera Beach's economy out of the doldrums, local leaders have said. Opponents call the plan a government-sanctioned land grab that benefits private developers and the wealthy. "What they mean is that the view I have is too good for me and should go to some millionaire," said Martha Babson, 60, a house painter who lives near the Intracoastal Waterway. "This is a reverse Robin Hood," said state Rep. Ronald L. Greenstein, a Coconut Creek Democrat who serves on a state legislative committee making recommendations on how to strengthen safeguards on private property. With many Americans sensitized to eminent-domain cases after a much-discussed ruling by the Supreme Court in June, property-rights organizations have been pointing to redevelopment plans in this Palm Beach County town as proof that laws must be changed to protect homeowners and businesses from the schemes of politicians. "Unfortunately, taking poorer folks' homes and turning them into higher-end development projects is all too routine in Florida and throughout the country," said Scott G. Bullock, a senior attorney for the Institute for Justice, based in Washington, D.C. "What distinguishes Riviera Beach is the sheer scope of the project, and the number of people it displaces." In June, a divided U.S. Supreme Court approved the plan of New London, Conn., to force some homeowners to sell their properties for a private development that was supposed to generate more jobs and tax revenue. That ruling has led to moves in Congress and at least 35 states, including Florida, to restrict the use of eminent-domain seizures of private property. 'Blighted' land may be seized In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." A skeptical Babson, who lives in a single-story, concrete-block home painted aqua that she shares with parrots and a dog, did her own survey. For three months, she walked the streets of Riviera Beach photographing houses classified as "dilapidated" or "deteriorated" by specialists hired by the city. The official study, she said, was riddled with errors and misclassifications. Lots inventoried as "vacant" (one of 14 criteria that allow Florida cities or counties to declare a neighborhood blighted) actually had homes on them built in 1997, she said. One house deemed "dilapidated," she found, was two years old. Mayor Brown and Floyd T. Johnson, executive director of the Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, did not respond to repeated requests from the Los Angeles Times for an interview. The redevelopment agency's website says the plan will "create a city respected for its community pride and purpose, and reshape it into a most desirable urban [place] to live, work, shop and relax for its residents, business and visitors." In past media interviews, Brown has said that his city was in dire need of jobs and that if officials weren't allowed to resort to eminent domain to spur growth, Riviera Beach could perish |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
|
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
" *JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. Yes.....it seems Florida restricted the E.D laws after the SCOTUS decision, and the DEMOCRAT mayor is trying to skirt the law. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. You idiot, it's a STATE LAW, NOT a county ordinance!! A STATE LAW......now, quickly, what party is now governing Florida? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. I"m not Kevin but gee, little twit, you might perhaps read it yourself before opening up you **** filled mouth: In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." Now, go back to your preying............. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
|
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE Kevin, why are you getting so worked up? I suggest you grab a bowl of those *buggers* you said your kids like and a coke and chill to some soft music for a while.....maybe the sounds of the World Class all volunteer Atlanta Philharmonic Orchestra. That was the one that you said you heard last year in concert even though this is their first year........eh? http://www.atlantaphilharmonic.org/ |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
" *JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE Kevin, why are you getting so worked up? Because once again he has dived head first into a pile of human fecal matter, and will now try to tap dance his way out of it. The state law enacted after the SCOTUS decision restricted the use of E.D. The DEMOCRAT mayor is trying to skirt the lintent of the law. Kevin lacks reading comprehension, so he didn't understand what he cut and pasted. I suggest you grab a bowl of those *buggers* you said your kids like and a coke and chill to some soft music for a while.....maybe the sounds of the World Class all volunteer Atlanta Philharmonic Orchestra. That was the one that you said you heard last year in concert even though this is their first year........eh? http://www.atlantaphilharmonic.org/ |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... Yup. Same for Riviera Beach. The state (and especially the Governor) doesn't have anything to do with it, other than granting the power to the local officials. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Tom,
What Kevin is trying to say is "it is ok if Democrats do it, it is wrong when Republicans do it". wrote in message ups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... Let me be sure YOU understand. This case is in the state of FLORIDA. Florida's governor, and his henchmen, are REPUBLICANS. They are taking PRIVATE homes from people to build DEVELOPMENTS that will increase the tax base. Let me be sure you understand - REPUBLICANS... |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
JimH,
Why should this cut and paste from Kevin be any different than the other cut and pastes from Kevin? " *JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Eminent domain in Riviera Beach is being conducted at the local level...not at the state or gubernatorial level. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is
pushing this plan. You idiot, it's a STATE LAW, NOT a county ordinance!! A STATE LAW......now, quickly, what party is now governing Florida? It's not the law that's the problem, it's the abuse of law by a black Mayor. Remember the OJ case? -- Skipper |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Kevin,
Let me speak slowly just for you. The State Law does not REQUIRE the county or city to do anything. The Democratic controlled county and mayor who is pushing the plan. DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS, DAMN THEM TO HELL AND BACK. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Kevin, Let me speak slowly just for you. The State Law does not REQUIRE the county or city to do anything. The Democratic controlled county and mayor who is pushing the plan. DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS, DAMN THEM TO HELL AND BACK. Yet another *abuse of power* case when Dems are in control. Sadly, our history is filled with Democrats bungling. The Dems prove the Peter Principle daily. -- Skipper |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Eminent domain in Riviera Beach is being conducted at the local level...not at the state or gubernatorial level. And the DEMOCRATS are trying to skirt the restrictions of the state law. Kevin has soiled himself once again.......but will continue to shout his position thinking that if he does it long enough, it will become true. What else can you expect from the "King of the NG idiots"??? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Eminent domain in Riviera Beach is being conducted at the local level...not at the state or gubernatorial level. I think that Kevin left the building with Elvis. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
But the state does have criterea that the DEMOCRATS seem to be skirting
around................ "That ruling has led to moves in Congress and at least 35 states, including Florida, to restrict the use of eminent-domain seizures of private property. 'Blighted' land may be seized In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." A skeptical Babson, who lives in a single-story, concrete-block home painted aqua that she shares with parrots and a dog, did her own survey. For three months, she walked the streets of Riviera Beach photographing houses classified as "dilapidated" or "deteriorated" by specialists hired by the city. The official study, she said, was riddled with errors and misclassifications. Lots inventoried as "vacant" (one of 14 criteria that allow Florida cities or counties to declare a neighborhood blighted) actually had homes on them built in 1997, she said. One house deemed "dilapidated," she found, was two years old. Mayor Brown and Floyd T. Johnson, executive director of the Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, did not respond to repeated requests from the Los Angeles Times for an interview. The redevelopment agency's website says the plan will "create a city respected for its community pride and purpose, and reshape it into a most desirable urban [place] to live, work, shop and relax for its residents, business and visitors." In past media interviews, Brown has said that his city was in dire need of jobs and that if officials weren't allowed to resort to eminent domain to spur growth, Riviera Beach could perish "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message . .. Kevin, Let me speak slowly just for you. The State Law does not REQUIRE the county or city to do anything. The Democratic controlled county and mayor who is pushing the plan. DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS, DAMN THEM TO HELL AND BACK. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Paul,
I can promise you, Kevin will not say "Opps, I screwed up". He will insist it is everyone else who doesn't understand. Ask Kevin about whiskey. For some reason, Kevin does not realize whiskey must be aged in charred oak barrels to be considered whiskey. If they are not, they are just another grain alcohol. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Eminent domain in Riviera Beach is being conducted at the local level...not at the state or gubernatorial level. And the DEMOCRATS are trying to skirt the restrictions of the state law. Kevin has soiled himself once again.......but will continue to shout his position thinking that if he does it long enough, it will become true. What else can you expect from the "King of the NG idiots"??? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATIC CROOKS. THEY SHOULD ALL BE CASTRATED.
Rivera Beach is right next to Palm Beach, so it is easy to understand why they could not get this correct either. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... But the state does have criterea that the DEMOCRATS seem to be skirting around................ "That ruling has led to moves in Congress and at least 35 states, including Florida, to restrict the use of eminent-domain seizures of private property. 'Blighted' land may be seized In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." A skeptical Babson, who lives in a single-story, concrete-block home painted aqua that she shares with parrots and a dog, did her own survey. For three months, she walked the streets of Riviera Beach photographing houses classified as "dilapidated" or "deteriorated" by specialists hired by the city. The official study, she said, was riddled with errors and misclassifications. Lots inventoried as "vacant" (one of 14 criteria that allow Florida cities or counties to declare a neighborhood blighted) actually had homes on them built in 1997, she said. One house deemed "dilapidated," she found, was two years old. Mayor Brown and Floyd T. Johnson, executive director of the Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, did not respond to repeated requests from the Los Angeles Times for an interview. The redevelopment agency's website says the plan will "create a city respected for its community pride and purpose, and reshape it into a most desirable urban [place] to live, work, shop and relax for its residents, business and visitors." In past media interviews, Brown has said that his city was in dire need of jobs and that if officials weren't allowed to resort to eminent domain to spur growth, Riviera Beach could perish "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message . .. Kevin, Let me speak slowly just for you. The State Law does not REQUIRE the county or city to do anything. The Democratic controlled county and mayor who is pushing the plan. DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS, DAMN THEM TO HELL AND BACK. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
What to hell? Are you trying to cow down me?
LMAO Speaking of whiskey, I have to cross the border to the south and go measure an old residence that was once owned by a nephew of Hiram Walker......just down the block from the distillery. And yes.....I do have to go south to get into Canada. "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... Paul, I can promise you, Kevin will not say "Opps, I screwed up". He will insist it is everyone else who doesn't understand. Ask Kevin about whiskey. For some reason, Kevin does not realize whiskey must be aged in charred oak barrels to be considered whiskey. If they are not, they are just another grain alcohol. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Eminent domain in Riviera Beach is being conducted at the local level...not at the state or gubernatorial level. And the DEMOCRATS are trying to skirt the restrictions of the state law. Kevin has soiled himself once again.......but will continue to shout his position thinking that if he does it long enough, it will become true. What else can you expect from the "King of the NG idiots"??? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
I have to admit though, Rivera Beach was a s**t hole 15 years ago when I
traveled there all the time. It was sandwiched between West Palm to the south, Palm Beach Gardens to the north (the Gardens Mall there was a project of mine) and Singer Island. Rivera Beach has a great location, adjacent to the Intercoastal. "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATIC CROOKS. THEY SHOULD ALL BE CASTRATED. Rivera Beach is right next to Palm Beach, so it is easy to understand why they could not get this correct either. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... But the state does have criterea that the DEMOCRATS seem to be skirting around................ "That ruling has led to moves in Congress and at least 35 states, including Florida, to restrict the use of eminent-domain seizures of private property. 'Blighted' land may be seized In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." A skeptical Babson, who lives in a single-story, concrete-block home painted aqua that she shares with parrots and a dog, did her own survey. For three months, she walked the streets of Riviera Beach photographing houses classified as "dilapidated" or "deteriorated" by specialists hired by the city. The official study, she said, was riddled with errors and misclassifications. Lots inventoried as "vacant" (one of 14 criteria that allow Florida cities or counties to declare a neighborhood blighted) actually had homes on them built in 1997, she said. One house deemed "dilapidated," she found, was two years old. Mayor Brown and Floyd T. Johnson, executive director of the Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, did not respond to repeated requests from the Los Angeles Times for an interview. The redevelopment agency's website says the plan will "create a city respected for its community pride and purpose, and reshape it into a most desirable urban [place] to live, work, shop and relax for its residents, business and visitors." In past media interviews, Brown has said that his city was in dire need of jobs and that if officials weren't allowed to resort to eminent domain to spur growth, Riviera Beach could perish "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message . .. Kevin, Let me speak slowly just for you. The State Law does not REQUIRE the county or city to do anything. The Democratic controlled county and mayor who is pushing the plan. DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS, DAMN THEM TO HELL AND BACK. wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Skipper wrote: Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. You idiot, it's a STATE LAW, NOT a county ordinance!! A STATE LAW......now, quickly, what party is now governing Florida? It's not the law that's the problem, it's the abuse of law by a black Mayor. Remember the OJ case? -- Skipper Here you go. Probably still time for you to order several of these religious icons in time for the upcoming holiday. I know how much you would treasure the opportunity to display these proudly in your home. In spite of all the flak you keep passing my way I'll ignore that, in the spirit of the season, and share this valuable link with you. http://www.littleafrica.com/blacksantas/ Enjoy. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote:
Probably still time for you to order several of these religious icons in time for the upcoming holiday. I know how much you would treasure the opportunity to display these proudly in your home. In spite of all the flak you keep passing my way I'll ignore that, in the spirit of the season, and share this valuable link with you. http://www.littleafrica.com/blacksantas/ Which one is the Santa Klause? -- Skipper |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
*JimH* wrote: I think that Kevin left the building with Elvis. Well, probably went back to rehab, after being cut loose for "work release" |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: This, by the way, is a STATE law. Who to hell is the governor of that hell hole anyway? Oh, yeah, Jeb Bush! Palm beach county is democrat country. It is a democrat mayor who is pushing this plan. These are the same compassionate liberals who wanted mandatory photo IDs for all "guest workers" in their community and wanted to gate the whole damn town. If you are black or brown, don't let the sun go down on your ass in Palm Beach. That also applies to poor white people. Kevin, I would suggest you start reading your cut 'n pastes before you post them here to make sure they actually do support your position. I"m not Kevin but gee, little twit, you might perhaps read it yourself before opening up you **** filled mouth: In Florida, the law allows local officials to take private land for redevelopment if they deem it "blighted." In May 2001, a study conducted for the city found that "slum and blighted conditions" existed in about a third of Riviera Beach and that redevelopment was necessary "in the interest of public health, safety, morals and welfare." Now, go back to your preying............. So it is a Democratic MAyor, who paid for a study to get a blighted tag hung on the land. Sounds more like redevelopment and the take for better uses that was the basis in the first case. But seems as if it might not be blighted. According to the article, a 2 year old house is a blight? |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 10:44:43 -0800, wrote: Are you just an argumentative dumbass or is your life that empty that you take things out of context just to be a dick and have something to do? At least Harry's and DSK's arguments make sense. This would never have happened if it wasn't for DEMOCRATS. Tom, Part of Kevin's response is because he likes to be argumentative, but in reality the real reason he seems so argumentative is because he has severe problems understanding simple concepts. Kevin, has the uncanny knack of cut and pasting articles disproving his theory. This is the reason I believe he does not have the ability to process simple concepts. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
9.
Dec 9, 1:22 pm show options Newsgroups: rec.boats From: - Find messages by this author Date: 9 Dec 2005 11:22:47 -0800 Local: Fri, Dec 9 2005 1:22 pm Subject: OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws Let me be sure you understand - REPUBLICANS... It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Aww, C'mon guys back off a bit, will you??? The kids about to start crying........ ;0 |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
9.
Dec 9, 1:22 pm show options Newsgroups: rec.boats From: - Find messages by this author Date: 9 Dec 2005 11:22:47 -0800 Local: Fri, Dec 9 2005 1:22 pm Subject: OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws Let me be sure you understand - REPUBLICANS... It's a STATE LAW, NOT A COUNTY ORDINANCE IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! Aww, C'mon guys back off a bit, will you??? The kids about to start crying........ ;0 Poor dumbass, thought he'd be cute and splash in the puddle, only to find himself neck deep in quick****. And trying to yell his way out and hold his pride at the same time.. tisk, tisk.... |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
I think that Kevin left the building with Elvis. Amazing the boy could even find the door! |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 11:22:47 -0800, wrote: P Fritz wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 9 Dec 2005 09:25:19 -0800, wrote: Hey Bassy, It was the Democratic City Council in New London, CT who turned all eminent domain decisions to a PRIVATE developer - the New London Development Corporation who immediately started proceedings against people in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood which ultimately led to the Kelo decision by the USSC. Let me spell it out for you - D E M O C R A T S sold out to the evil P R I V A T E interests in New London which made all this possible. The implications of this immediately went nation wide. And it was all the fault of a DEMOCRAT controlled City Council. Let me be sure you understand - D E M O C R A T S... I had to go look up what kevin was posting, and as usual, he shoots himself in the foot once again. It is a D E M O C R A T mayor Michael Brown who is pushing the seizure of private property, and very likely in violation of the restrictive state law passed after the SCOTUS decision And Kevin wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" ???? IT's a REPUBLICAN law, in the STATE OF FLORIDA, you dip****!!!! It not a Republican law dummy. It's a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. Never mind - it obviously too complicated for you to understand. Kevin is dumber than a tree stump, but he will have all weekend to recover before making an ass of himself Mon. morning. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:42:31 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: Kevin is dumber than a tree stump, but he will have all weekend to recover before making an ass of himself Mon. morning. That's the strange thing - he's not dumber than a tree stump. I will politely disagree :-) He actually is fairly with it and when not on his freakin' high horse, he actually has something fairly decent to say. When he get's stubborn, the problems surface. I've been involved in several decent threads with his participation and enjoyed them. I have nothing against him at all - other than that one thing. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:42:31 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: Kevin is dumber than a tree stump, but he will have all weekend to recover before making an ass of himself Mon. morning. That's the strange thing - he's not dumber than a tree stump. He actually is fairly with it and when not on his freakin' high horse, he actually has something fairly decent to say. When he get's stubborn, the problems surface. I've been involved in several decent threads with his participation and enjoyed them. I have nothing against him at all - other than that one thing. And he is usually 'severely provoked' before getting worked up. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Don White" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:42:31 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: Kevin is dumber than a tree stump, but he will have all weekend to recover before making an ass of himself Mon. morning. That's the strange thing - he's not dumber than a tree stump. He actually is fairly with it and when not on his freakin' high horse, he actually has something fairly decent to say. When he get's stubborn, the problems surface. I've been involved in several decent threads with his participation and enjoyed them. I have nothing against him at all - other than that one thing. And he is usually 'severely provoked' before getting worked up. Don, Kevin is the one who started this thread. It was OT...and completely out of the blue. |
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:42:31 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: Kevin is dumber than a tree stump, but he will have all weekend to recover before making an ass of himself Mon. morning. That's the strange thing - he's not dumber than a tree stump. He actually is fairly with it Tom, Kevins skills at logic and reason are among the poorest I've seen. There may be areas of his brain that function properly, but the logic and reason portion isn't one of them. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com