NYOB,
Have you figured it out yet? Anyone you come up with to substantiate your
claim is not legitimate. If they were legitimate, they would support
Harry's claim.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
What about the Iraqis who want us out and are shooting at and
otherwise creating mayhem for US troops?
If they're solely targeting US troops, then call them the
"resistance" movement...or "freedom fighters" if that pleases you
more. But the majority of the indiscriminate bombings and killings
over there are being conducted by terrorists...most of whom are
foreign-born.
B.S. to the "foreign-born." Most of them are Iraqis. Prove otherwise,
without citing anyone in anyway connected to the lying Bush
misadministration, or anyone who reports to it.
Who would you consider a reputable source to substantiate my claim?

By adding in the words "anyone who reports to it (the Bush
administration)", you have just ruled out every member of our armed
forces.

So the only other people with eyes and ears on the ground in Iraq are
the newly elected Iraqi officials. Would you like to hear Prime
Minister al-Jafari's take on the question about who's doing the
killing?
- - -


There's no reason to believe Bush, his administration, or anyone who
reports to it or is beholden to it.


So then:

"Who would you consider a reputable source to substantiate my claim?"

You puzzle it out, and come back when you have some legitimate data.





--
Jesus: A Long Haired, Peace Loving, Anti Establishment, Liberal.