Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen numerous Crownlines that look like they are well made. I would
like to get opinions from others who have owned Crownlines. Are they as well made as they look or are looks deceiving. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John wrote: I have seen numerous Crownlines that look like they are well made. I would like to get opinions from others who have owned Crownlines. Are they as well made as they look or are looks deceiving. I don't own a Crownline, but I have researched the line extensively and written reviews on a few of their models over the last couple of years. Crownline is currently building a very good boat. It doesn't make much sense to fret about who builds the "best" boat, as we all have different priorities. There is an obvious difference between Crownline and some of its cheapest competitors, but no dramatic difference between Crownline and some of the "platinum plated" trademarks you'd pay much more to own. The main difference is that some of the premium trademarks have a bit more panache' attached to the nameplate (and they will let you pay for it, of course), but Crownline is still in the process of building an excellent reputation. I don't personally but a lot of stock in the JD Powers survey, but if you do you might be interested to know that Crownline had the best customer satisfaction rating, small runabout category, in the Powers survey for the 2004 model year. Crownline shared a virtual tie for first place in that same category with either Cobalt or Chaparral in 2005. Before Crownline's back-to-back 1st place finishes no boat had ever taken 1st place two years in a row. The fit, finish, and choice of equipment and hardware is very good on the Crownlines. Among the design features they incorporate is a little adjustment to the hull in the aft quarters to create a "vortex" immediately aft of the transom. This is supposed to make a substantial reduction in the "wandering" tendency during slow speed operation of a typical sterndrive, and in my experience aboard Crownlines it does. The Crownlines I have been aboard come to plane quickly, are faster than lightnin' on a caffeine high, and maintain a solid feel at high speed or when pounding through a moderate head sea. If I were shopping for a trailer boat, Crownline would be on the short list. If a quality build is important to you, it's my opinion that you would not be disappointed with this brand. Good luck to you. If you wind up with a Crownline or some other boat that compares favorably, you can't go too far wrong. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damn Chuck, have you ever thought about doing this professionally? ; )
wrote in message oups.com... John wrote: I have seen numerous Crownlines that look like they are well made. I would like to get opinions from others who have owned Crownlines. Are they as well made as they look or are looks deceiving. I don't own a Crownline, but I have researched the line extensively and written reviews on a few of their models over the last couple of years. Crownline is currently building a very good boat. It doesn't make much sense to fret about who builds the "best" boat, as we all have different priorities. There is an obvious difference between Crownline and some of its cheapest competitors, but no dramatic difference between Crownline and some of the "platinum plated" trademarks you'd pay much more to own. The main difference is that some of the premium trademarks have a bit more panache' attached to the nameplate (and they will let you pay for it, of course), but Crownline is still in the process of building an excellent reputation. I don't personally but a lot of stock in the JD Powers survey, but if you do you might be interested to know that Crownline had the best customer satisfaction rating, small runabout category, in the Powers survey for the 2004 model year. Crownline shared a virtual tie for first place in that same category with either Cobalt or Chaparral in 2005. Before Crownline's back-to-back 1st place finishes no boat had ever taken 1st place two years in a row. The fit, finish, and choice of equipment and hardware is very good on the Crownlines. Among the design features they incorporate is a little adjustment to the hull in the aft quarters to create a "vortex" immediately aft of the transom. This is supposed to make a substantial reduction in the "wandering" tendency during slow speed operation of a typical sterndrive, and in my experience aboard Crownlines it does. The Crownlines I have been aboard come to plane quickly, are faster than lightnin' on a caffeine high, and maintain a solid feel at high speed or when pounding through a moderate head sea. If I were shopping for a trailer boat, Crownline would be on the short list. If a quality build is important to you, it's my opinion that you would not be disappointed with this brand. Good luck to you. If you wind up with a Crownline or some other boat that compares favorably, you can't go too far wrong. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck,
I'll second what was previously stated - good writeup and thanks for taking the time to respond wrote in message oups.com... John wrote: I have seen numerous Crownlines that look like they are well made. I would like to get opinions from others who have owned Crownlines. Are they as well made as they look or are looks deceiving. I don't own a Crownline, but I have researched the line extensively and written reviews on a few of their models over the last couple of years. Crownline is currently building a very good boat. It doesn't make much sense to fret about who builds the "best" boat, as we all have different priorities. There is an obvious difference between Crownline and some of its cheapest competitors, but no dramatic difference between Crownline and some of the "platinum plated" trademarks you'd pay much more to own. The main difference is that some of the premium trademarks have a bit more panache' attached to the nameplate (and they will let you pay for it, of course), but Crownline is still in the process of building an excellent reputation. I don't personally but a lot of stock in the JD Powers survey, but if you do you might be interested to know that Crownline had the best customer satisfaction rating, small runabout category, in the Powers survey for the 2004 model year. Crownline shared a virtual tie for first place in that same category with either Cobalt or Chaparral in 2005. Before Crownline's back-to-back 1st place finishes no boat had ever taken 1st place two years in a row. The fit, finish, and choice of equipment and hardware is very good on the Crownlines. Among the design features they incorporate is a little adjustment to the hull in the aft quarters to create a "vortex" immediately aft of the transom. This is supposed to make a substantial reduction in the "wandering" tendency during slow speed operation of a typical sterndrive, and in my experience aboard Crownlines it does. The Crownlines I have been aboard come to plane quickly, are faster than lightnin' on a caffeine high, and maintain a solid feel at high speed or when pounding through a moderate head sea. If I were shopping for a trailer boat, Crownline would be on the short list. If a quality build is important to you, it's my opinion that you would not be disappointed with this brand. Good luck to you. If you wind up with a Crownline or some other boat that compares favorably, you can't go too far wrong. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have 3 friends who own Crownline, and all of them think they are the best
thing since sliced bread. They are a mid priced boat, with excellent quality and quality control. All of these guys purchased the boat new, and had very few items that needed to be corrected by the dealer. "John" wrote in message news:GEujf.45603$2k5.23066@dukeread09... I have seen numerous Crownlines that look like they are well made. I would like to get opinions from others who have owned Crownlines. Are they as well made as they look or are looks deceiving. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bristol 24 Wanted - Chesapeake Bay Area | ASA | |||
OT Why Bush Wanted to Bomb al-Jazeera Network | General | |||
Westerbeke W52 diesel...opinions? | Cruising |