![]() |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
In 1993, Representive Murth urged President Clinton to withdraw our troops
from Somalia: "Our welcome has been worn out," Rep Murtha told NBC's "Today" show in Sept. 1993, after the Mogadishu battle cost the lives of 18 U.S. Rangers. The Pennsylvania Democrat announced that President Clinton had been "listening to our suggestions. And I think you'll see him move those troops out very quickly." In 1996, bin Laden's Declaration of War on the US made specific mention of the 1993 withdrawal of US troops from Somalia. bin Laden used it as propaganda to help recruit more terrorists: "But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia. However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests" of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu." Now, in 2005, Murtha wants to repeat the mistake: "I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will IMMEDIATELY REDEPLOY. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a "free" Iraq. My plan calls: To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces. To create a quick reaction force in the region. To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines. To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering. Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our obligation is to speak out for them. That's why I am speaking out. Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME." |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? BTW--Today's "Bush Approval rating": Monday November 21, 2005--Forty-five percent (45%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty-four percent (54%) of Americans Disapprove of the President's performance. Among Republicans, 78% give the President their Approval. That view is shared by 19% of Democrats and 36% of those not affiliated with either major political party. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote: I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Nor does he have comment on the following: "The closer you look at the unions of today, the scummier they look.Those who run the day to day operation of unions are mostly just crooks, assorted ****-ups, scalawags, and ne'er-do-wells. They couldn't hold a job if not for their union position. And now this assortment is demanding control of all our well run company pension funds. Fat chance!" "Now I don't want to come off as anti-union, which I'm not. At one time unions did a great service for America. Unfortunately, leftist whackos like Harry Krause elbowed their way into these unions and seized control from real Americans. You know how these scumbags always insist on things only going their way. They leave no room for divergent opinions. Just look at the mess these leftists have made of the Middle East." "And then there's Carter. He and Stansfield Turner gutted our military and intelligence network. Those with real Middle East intelligence skills were sent packing. We are still paying for Carter's blunders. So, who's fault is it? Johnson? Carter? Or those always anti-Americans on the Looney Left...you know, Harry Krause types." -- Skipper |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:30:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
[snipped] ==================================== So what's the status of the new boat? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Some people know when to let a country melt down all by itself. I'm sure that some of our representatives thought that leaving would show weakness, which is exactly what OBL said. So what? If your neighbor's marriage is falling apart, do you offer to talk if they need to? Or, do you kick in their front door and tell them you're not leaving until they straighten things out? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:30:34 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: [snipped] ==================================== So what's the status of the new boat? Very nice. The generator is getting replaced a week from Friday. The boat runs very well...with a cruise speed of just under 31 mph burning approximately 23 gph. I "detailed" the inside yesterday, and found water in the forward bilge. I located a small crack in a plastic fitting running to the Cruisair raw water pump. I replaced it with a bronze fitting. From now on, I know to close the seacocks that I'm not using...and to inspect them more thoroughly before any long runs. I have to say that it's *very* nice working in the cabin when the air is running. One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. It has something to do with the water pickup, and the possibility that the water flow to the A/C could get disrupted at the higher planing speeds. So the generator and A/C will get used while grouper digging or when trolling...but not on the long runs out to the fishing grounds. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:22:24 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: -- Don't pray in my public schools, and I won't think in your church. Or elsewhere, for that matter. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. I would hope that if the solution was that easy, then Grady would have done it. But sometimes the simplest things are often overlooked. When I get the new lift, I'll look at the bottom of the hull to see if there's a scoop-type pickup. Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? If that's the case, then it wouldn't be a problem in flat seas. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. I was pretty happy with it. The performance data that Yamaha lists for their 250 four-strokes gives an optimum cruise of approximately 30 mph, burning approximately 19 gph. That's 1 mph slower, but a 20% improvement in overall fuel burn rate. Of course, I was running with 1800 lbs. of fuel, 250 pounds of water, and 5 people on board...and my boat had the additional weight of the optional generator...plus the drag from all of the eisenglass. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Some people know when to let a country melt down all by itself. I'm sure that some of our representatives thought that leaving would show weakness, which is exactly what OBL said. So what? If your neighbor's marriage is falling apart, do you offer to talk if they need to? Or, do you kick in their front door and tell them you're not leaving until they straighten things out? You are *the* man of off-the-wall analogies. You compare the situation in Somalia to a failing marriage? How would have talking to Aideed helped in Somalia? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. And move the through hull to the bottom of the boat just ahead of the transom. That's precisely where it's shown in the schematics in my owners manual. But my boat has it in the bilge area under the aft birth in the forward cabin. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:11:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: One thing that I didn't know is that the owners manual states that the A/C shouldn't be run when operating the outboards over 2500 RPM. ============================================== Interesting. I never have that problem with the trawler running at 9 kts. :-) You could probably replace the through hull fitting with a "scoop" type that would actually force water through the A/C at speed, but I suppose there's always the risk of losing cooling water to the generator as well. Fuel burn sounds very reasonable for a boat of that size and speed. And move the through hull to the bottom of the boat just ahead of the transom. That's precisely where it's shown in the schematics in my owners manual. But my boat has it in the bilge area under the aft birth in the forward cabin. I'd call the factory and ask why it was put where it shouldn't have been. Was the A/C an aftermarket job? I don't know. Regardless, even though the manual shows the A/C pickup near the stern, it still says not to operate the A/C when running over 2500 RPM. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. Cool, bet that was a fun ride going back to Naples. Did you happen to eat at the Rattle Fish? It's right at Bayside, at Tyson St. Good food, fun place. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: In 1993, Representive Murth I'm sure you'll do a wonderful job convincing yourself and a few of the other righties. Your boy Bush is heading for history's dumpster. So you have no comment on the fact that Murtha urged the removal of troops from Somalia in 1993, and bin Laden used that specific retreat as propaganda material in a fatwa he issued 3 years later declaring war on the US? Some people know when to let a country melt down all by itself. I'm sure that some of our representatives thought that leaving would show weakness, which is exactly what OBL said. So what? If your neighbor's marriage is falling apart, do you offer to talk if they need to? Or, do you kick in their front door and tell them you're not leaving until they straighten things out? You are *the* man of off-the-wall analogies. You compare the situation in Somalia to a failing marriage? How would have talking to Aideed helped in Somalia? I didn't say we should hug a lunatic and help him see a better way. I'm pointing out that we have a habit (which cannot be debated - so don't try) of lumbering into whatever country we fancy at the moment, and trying to either force a template onto it, or attempting to accelerate political and social changes which need to proceed on their own. Vietnam's a perfect example. It's still a communist country (according to the CIA), so our presence there was a complete waste of lives and time. As economists in the 1960s pointed out, even communist countries would eventually have to behave like capitalists to bolster trade, but we couldn't wait for that evolutionary process. You know the rest. How many more examples would you like? |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. Cool, bet that was a fun ride going back to Naples. Did you happen to eat at the Rattle Fish? It's right at Bayside, at Tyson St. Good food, fun place. It looked like a neat place, but I didn't eat there. We were pressed for time, so I brought Publix subs for the ride home. As it turned out, we didn't get back to my house until 2 1/2 hours after sunset. The last 25 miles or so were pretty damn bumpy. I couldn't see how big the seas were because it was dark, but I'd estimate that they were 3-5. It's not a trip that I want to make again in just one day...at least until my kids are older and don't need as much looking-after as they needed on that trip. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote: wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. Cool, bet that was a fun ride going back to Naples. Did you happen to eat at the Rattle Fish? It's right at Bayside, at Tyson St. Good food, fun place. It looked like a neat place, but I didn't eat there. We were pressed for time, so I brought Publix subs for the ride home. As it turned out, we didn't get back to my house until 2 1/2 hours after sunset. The last 25 miles or so were pretty damn bumpy. I couldn't see how big the seas were because it was dark, but I'd estimate that they were 3-5. It's not a trip that I want to make again in just one day...at least until my kids are older and don't need as much looking-after as they needed on that trip. I'll bet. I used to shark fish from the pier at Ft. DeSoto, and it would get rough as hell out there after sunset. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. Cool, bet that was a fun ride going back to Naples. Did you happen to eat at the Rattle Fish? It's right at Bayside, at Tyson St. Good food, fun place. It looked like a neat place, but I didn't eat there. We were pressed for time, so I brought Publix subs for the ride home. As it turned out, we didn't get back to my house until 2 1/2 hours after sunset. The last 25 miles or so were pretty damn bumpy. I couldn't see how big the seas were because it was dark, but I'd estimate that they were 3-5. It's not a trip that I want to make again in just one day...at least until my kids are older and don't need as much looking-after as they needed on that trip. I'll bet. I used to shark fish from the pier at Ft. DeSoto, and it would get rough as hell out there after sunset. The seas were not bad when I left Tampa. They were 3-4...but spaced well apart. They didn't get bad until south of Sanibel. When you round the southern tip of Sanibel and make a straight course for Naples, you are 15+ miles from land, with nothing to protect you from the strong ENE wind that was blowing that night. |
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:53:30 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: Maybe Grady feels that an offshore boat running 20-30 mph in rough seas could break the through-hull free from the water, causing the pump to lose it's prime? =============================================== Most A/C circulating pumps are not self priming and have to be mounted below the waterline. If the through hull is forward, losing prime in the waves could be an issue I suppose. The through hull is located beneath the cabin sole...so I believe you're right. So, where'd you get the boat, NOYB? Bayside Marina. About a half mile south of Gandy Blvd (by the railroad tracks). It was about 160 run by water back to Naples. Cool, bet that was a fun ride going back to Naples. Did you happen to eat at the Rattle Fish? It's right at Bayside, at Tyson St. Good food, fun place. It looked like a neat place, but I didn't eat there. We were pressed for time, so I brought Publix subs for the ride home. As it turned out, we didn't get back to my house until 2 1/2 hours after sunset. The last 25 miles or so were pretty damn bumpy. I couldn't see how big the seas were because it was dark, but I'd estimate that they were 3-5. It's not a trip that I want to make again in just one day...at least until my kids are older and don't need as much looking-after as they needed on that trip. I'll bet. I used to shark fish from the pier at Ft. DeSoto, and it would get rough as hell out there after sunset. The seas were not bad when I left Tampa. They were 3-4...but spaced well apart. They didn't get bad until south of Sanibel. When you round the southern tip of Sanibel and make a straight course for Naples, you are 15+ miles from land, with nothing to protect you from the strong ENE wind that was blowing that night. Tampa Bay can get pretty miserable when the wind comes in from the skyway bridge. Because it's quite shallow in a lot of places, it gets choppy as hell. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com