![]() |
Nice, eh?
In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says... Hey, jps! What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be executed, was a Democrat? Tail tightly tucked? No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will, unless it's in self-defense. If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up, that's what should happen. We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on false pretenses. Like in Iraq. jps |
Nice, eh?
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:09:57 -0800, jps wrote:
In article , PocoLoco415 says... Hey, jps! What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be executed, was a Democrat? Tail tightly tucked? No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will, unless it's in self-defense. If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up, that's what should happen. We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on false pretenses. Like in Iraq. jps But jps, wasn't your post, quoted below, directed at the low-life conservatives? ******************************************* According to conservatives, innocent babies shouldn't be murdered but it's okay to take another's life after birth. Further, it's okay if you die for a cause because others before you have died for the same cause, even if the cause has no validity. As long as they're not unborn. Lots of conservatives maintain these self-righteous sets of absolutes -- that's what makes me puke. jps ********************************************** Your jumping the gun makes me want to puke. But I guess you're just following your hero a little too closely. ('Lemmings', someone said?) -- John H "It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!" A Famous Hypocrite |
Nice, eh?
In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:09:57 -0800, jps wrote: In article , PocoLoco415 says... Hey, jps! What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be executed, was a Democrat? Tail tightly tucked? No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will, unless it's in self-defense. If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up, that's what should happen. We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on false pretenses. Like in Iraq. jps But jps, wasn't your post, quoted below, directed at the low-life conservatives? ******************************************* According to conservatives, innocent babies shouldn't be murdered but it's okay to take another's life after birth. Further, it's okay if you die for a cause because others before you have died for the same cause, even if the cause has no validity. As long as they're not unborn. Lots of conservatives maintain these self-righteous sets of absolutes -- that's what makes me puke. jps ********************************************** Your jumping the gun makes me want to puke. But I guess you're just following your hero a little too closely. ('Lemmings', someone said?) Statement still stands. Texas has been pointed in the wrong direction for a long time. I don't agree with any leader who sanctions a man's death and stands by while it happens. You conservative fruitcakes are the ones who claim the right to save the unborn and have little if any compunction about killing those you feel deserve it. Conservatives align themselves far more regularly with the death penalty than do Liberals. The death penalty isn't pro-life. jps |
Nice, eh?
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:11:13 -0800, jps wrote:
In article , PocoLoco415 says... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:09:57 -0800, jps wrote: In article , PocoLoco415 says... Hey, jps! What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be executed, was a Democrat? Tail tightly tucked? No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will, unless it's in self-defense. If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up, that's what should happen. We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on false pretenses. Like in Iraq. jps But jps, wasn't your post, quoted below, directed at the low-life conservatives? ******************************************* According to conservatives, innocent babies shouldn't be murdered but it's okay to take another's life after birth. Further, it's okay if you die for a cause because others before you have died for the same cause, even if the cause has no validity. As long as they're not unborn. Lots of conservatives maintain these self-righteous sets of absolutes -- that's what makes me puke. jps ********************************************** Your jumping the gun makes me want to puke. But I guess you're just following your hero a little too closely. ('Lemmings', someone said?) Statement still stands. Texas has been pointed in the wrong direction for a long time. I don't agree with any leader who sanctions a man's death and stands by while it happens. You conservative fruitcakes are the ones who claim the right to save the unborn and have little if any compunction about killing those you feel deserve it. Conservatives align themselves far more regularly with the death penalty than do Liberals. The death penalty isn't pro-life. jps The one who did this was a Democrat fruitcake! Of course, Harry didn't bother to check that before making the post that sucked you right in. -- John H "It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!" A Famous Hypocrite |
Nice, eh?
The lemmings were all jumping off the cliff smiling all full of themselves.
They had caught Bush again, Bush murdered another innocent person. Too bad they were wrong and the facts don't support their position. The lemmings like to believe all Republicans and Conservatives believe in and support the death penalty. In reality, 48% of those who consider themselves conservative or moderate oppose the death penalty ( 21% C, 27% M). These are the people who voted for Bush. In reality 54% of those who consider themselves liberal support the death penalty. The lemmings are all running off the cliff ignoring the facts, because who needs facts, "we don't need now stinking facts". "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:11:13 -0800, jps wrote: In article , PocoLoco415 says... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:09:57 -0800, jps wrote: In article , PocoLoco415 says... Hey, jps! What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be executed, was a Democrat? Tail tightly tucked? No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will, unless it's in self-defense. If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up, that's what should happen. We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on false pretenses. Like in Iraq. jps But jps, wasn't your post, quoted below, directed at the low-life conservatives? ******************************************* According to conservatives, innocent babies shouldn't be murdered but it's okay to take another's life after birth. Further, it's okay if you die for a cause because others before you have died for the same cause, even if the cause has no validity. As long as they're not unborn. Lots of conservatives maintain these self-righteous sets of absolutes -- that's what makes me puke. jps ********************************************** Your jumping the gun makes me want to puke. But I guess you're just following your hero a little too closely. ('Lemmings', someone said?) Statement still stands. Texas has been pointed in the wrong direction for a long time. I don't agree with any leader who sanctions a man's death and stands by while it happens. You conservative fruitcakes are the ones who claim the right to save the unborn and have little if any compunction about killing those you feel deserve it. Conservatives align themselves far more regularly with the death penalty than do Liberals. The death penalty isn't pro-life. jps The one who did this was a Democrat fruitcake! Of course, Harry didn't bother to check that before making the post that sucked you right in. -- John H "It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!" A Famous Hypocrite |
Nice, eh?
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:46:16 -0500, Sir Rodney Smithers wrote:
In reality, 48% of those who consider themselves conservative or moderate oppose the death penalty ( 21% C, 27% M). These are the people who voted for Bush. In reality 54% of those who consider themselves liberal support the death penalty. Do you have a cite for those numbers? I'm not questioning your veracity. I just thought that death penalty supporters far outnumbered those opposed, regardless of liberal/conservative views. |
Nice, eh?
Thunder,
They are Gallop numbers. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/arti...id=23&did=1266 "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:46:16 -0500, Sir Rodney Smithers wrote: In reality, 48% of those who consider themselves conservative or moderate oppose the death penalty ( 21% C, 27% M). These are the people who voted for Bush. In reality 54% of those who consider themselves liberal support the death penalty. Do you have a cite for those numbers? I'm not questioning your veracity. I just thought that death penalty supporters far outnumbered those opposed, regardless of liberal/conservative views. |
Nice, eh?
Thunder,
I was surprised how many supported the death penalty. On a positive note, the number supporting the death penalty are decreasing every year. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:46:16 -0500, Sir Rodney Smithers wrote: In reality, 48% of those who consider themselves conservative or moderate oppose the death penalty ( 21% C, 27% M). These are the people who voted for Bush. In reality 54% of those who consider themselves liberal support the death penalty. Do you have a cite for those numbers? I'm not questioning your veracity. I just thought that death penalty supporters far outnumbered those opposed, regardless of liberal/conservative views. |
Nice, eh?
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:12:24 -0500, Sir Rodney Smithers wrote:
Thunder, I was surprised how many supported the death penalty. On a positive note, the number supporting the death penalty are decreasing every year. Thanks for the link. I guess I'm just stuck in the 90s, when 80% favored the death penalty. |
Nice, eh?
In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says... Of course, Harry didn't bother to check that before making the post that sucked you right in. Oh boy, really got me there John. Do you support the death penalty? jps |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com