In article t,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Sir Rodney Smithers"
Ask me about my knighthood. says...
jps,
OK, I will take you up on that bet. ; )

Put me down for $10,000.

Remember, the only reason Bush won, is because he was the best choice.
It
sucks when you have two bad choices.

It sucks when you have to run a wooden intellect against good ol' boy
Bush.


LOL. So basskisser has a "wooden intellect"?

I think you missed the point.

jps

jps,

NOYB can follow the discussion, he was playing with ya.

But on a serious side, Kerry is not an intellect, not by any stretch of the
imagination. If he truly was an intellect, he might have won. He is
someone of average intelligence, who tried to act like an intellect and he
just bored people to sleep.

Today, about a 33% of the country consider themselves strong Republicans,
about 40% consider themselves strong Democrats, most of the remaining
consider themselves independent. The only reason (and I do mean the only
reason) the Democrats lost is the Democrats blew it.

Don't try to place the blame on anyone but the Democrats.



"jps" wrote in message
...
In article t,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article , "Sir Rodney Smithers"
Ask me about my knighthood. says...
jps,
OK, I will take you up on that bet. ; )

Put me down for $10,000.

Remember, the only reason Bush won, is because he was the best choice.
It
sucks when you have two bad choices.

It sucks when you have to run a wooden intellect against good ol' boy
Bush.


LOL. So basskisser has a "wooden intellect"?

I think you missed the point.

jps

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:21:50 -0500, "Sir Rodney Smithers" Ask me about my
knighthood. wrote:

jps,

NOYB can follow the discussion, he was playing with ya.

But on a serious side, Kerry is not an intellect, not by any stretch of the
imagination. If he truly was an intellect, he might have won. He is
someone of average intelligence, who tried to act like an intellect and he
just bored people to sleep.


He tried to act like a hero, too, but that didn't work.


Today, about a 33% of the country consider themselves strong Republicans,
about 40% consider themselves strong Democrats, most of the remaining
consider themselves independent. The only reason (and I do mean the only
reason) the Democrats lost is the Democrats blew it.

Don't try to place the blame on anyone but the Democrats.



Amen.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

JohnH,

Kerry was the average GI Joe in Vietnam. He didn't want to be there, he did
everything he could to get out of there, something most of the young men in
America did. The problem is when he got home he attacked the soldiers and
their actions in a terrible war with no enemy that was easily identifiable.
There were many antiwar activist who attacked the policy of Viet Nam without
attacking the soldiers.

His strategy of suddenly trying to become a war hero did not fool anyone.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:21:50 -0500, "Sir Rodney Smithers" Ask me about my
knighthood. wrote:

jps,

NOYB can follow the discussion, he was playing with ya.

But on a serious side, Kerry is not an intellect, not by any stretch of
the
imagination. If he truly was an intellect, he might have won. He is
someone of average intelligence, who tried to act like an intellect and he
just bored people to sleep.


He tried to act like a hero, too, but that didn't work.


Today, about a 33% of the country consider themselves strong Republicans,
about 40% consider themselves strong Democrats, most of the remaining
consider themselves independent. The only reason (and I do mean the only
reason) the Democrats lost is the Democrats blew it.

Don't try to place the blame on anyone but the Democrats.



Amen.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:05:11 -0500, "Sir Rodney Smithers" Ask me about my
knighthood. wrote:

JohnH,

Kerry was the average GI Joe in Vietnam. He didn't want to be there, he did
everything he could to get out of there, something most of the young men in
America did. The problem is when he got home he attacked the soldiers and
their actions in a terrible war with no enemy that was easily identifiable.
There were many antiwar activist who attacked the policy of Viet Nam without
attacking the soldiers.

His strategy of suddenly trying to become a war hero did not fool anyone.


It fooled Harry and several others right here on the group!

--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

JohnH,

It probably fooled Kevin (he is the only person in here who really is
brain-dead). Harry and the democrats just jumped on board anything they
thought would derail Bush. They incorrectly assumed that Kerry's "war
record" would highlight Bush's lack of a war record. That was just very
poor strategy, it highlighted Kerry as a flip flopper, with no real
conviction on any issue. The democrats have no real strategy to turn about
their downward slide. They just hope the Republicans make enough mistakes
that the public will just vote for "anybody else".



"John H." wrote in message
news
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:05:11 -0500, "Sir Rodney Smithers" Ask me about my
knighthood. wrote:

JohnH,

Kerry was the average GI Joe in Vietnam. He didn't want to be there, he
did
everything he could to get out of there, something most of the young men
in
America did. The problem is when he got home he attacked the soldiers and
their actions in a terrible war with no enemy that was easily
identifiable.
There were many antiwar activist who attacked the policy of Viet Nam
without
attacking the soldiers.

His strategy of suddenly trying to become a war hero did not fool anyone.


It fooled Harry and several others right here on the group!

--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

"John H." wrote in message
news
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:05:11 -0500, "Sir Rodney Smithers" Ask me about my
knighthood. wrote:

JohnH,

Kerry was the average GI Joe in Vietnam. He didn't want to be there, he
did
everything he could to get out of there, something most of the young men
in
America did. The problem is when he got home he attacked the soldiers and
their actions in a terrible war with no enemy that was easily
identifiable.
There were many antiwar activist who attacked the policy of Viet Nam
without
attacking the soldiers.

His strategy of suddenly trying to become a war hero did not fool anyone.


It fooled Harry and several others right here on the group!

When is Kerry going to sign his DD 180 to release all of his military
records. You know then ones where all of his medals were rescinded and he
received a lower than general discharge and then when they were re-issued
and his discharge was upgraded to honorable after he became a Senator.

In article , "Sir Rodney
Smithers" Ask me about my knighthood. says...
JohnH,

Kerry was the average GI Joe in Vietnam. He didn't want to be there, he did
everything he could to get out of there, something most of the young men in
America did. The problem is when he got home he attacked the soldiers and
their actions in a terrible war with no enemy that was easily identifiable.
There were many antiwar activist who attacked the policy of Viet Nam without
attacking the soldiers.

His strategy of suddenly trying to become a war hero did not fool anyone.

Suddenly?

You ought to try reading something other than the funny papers on
Sunday.

His own men considered him a hero, when they were serving with him.

jps

In article , "Sir Rodney Smithers"
Ask me about my knighthood. says...
jps,

NOYB can follow the discussion, he was playing with ya.

But on a serious side, Kerry is not an intellect, not by any stretch of the
imagination. If he truly was an intellect, he might have won. He is
someone of average intelligence, who tried to act like an intellect and he
just bored people to sleep.

Today, about a 33% of the country consider themselves strong Republicans,
about 40% consider themselves strong Democrats, most of the remaining
consider themselves independent. The only reason (and I do mean the only
reason) the Democrats lost is the Democrats blew it.

Don't try to place the blame on anyone but the Democrats.

Wow, thanks for that great advice Rod.

I agree with you. The democrats have allow republicans to co-opt the
dem message with vapid pronouncements of care.

The country now sees the republicans for what they are, cynical sharks
who care nothing for the born, just the unborn (which is really just a
wedge issue) and the rich.

I place full responsibility for blowing the last two elections on the
dems. The fact that the election was close enough for the pugs to steal
is beside the point.

And Rod, I fully understood nobby was pulling my leg. The reason being
that he didn't have a comeback. Notice he didn't respond...

jps