![]() |
|
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
Kansas Prarie Chicken:
1) Capture a Prarie Chicken. More easily said than done. Used to running for its life on those stubby little legs, lives in mortal fear of being "caught" and darts around so quickly and pointlessly it appears to be in 2-3 positions at once. 2) Dispatch Prarie Chicken with a sharp axe. Don't be surprised if the dead body continues to run around brainlessly for a while after the decapitation, or if the severed head appears to be attempting to sqwuak. The brain of the Prarie Chicken gets so little use that it's really the bleeding out through the neck, vs the removal of the brain, that actually kills the bird. 3) Gut Prarie Chicken. This doesn't take long, as the Prarie Chicken doesn't have many guts. 4) Pluck Prarie Chicken. Don't be disappointed to discover that underneath all that proud and puffed-up plumage there really isn't a whole lot of actual bird. Those Kansas Prarie Chickens are built for show and go, but are relatively lacking in substance. 5) Cook Prarie Chicken. Turn up the heat under this bird, and while it will initially cook very slowly it eventually reaches a point where it collapses into a quivering mound of meat. Especially allow the bird to stew in its own juices. Roast, bake, or broil but avoid *boiling* the bird at all costs- the Kansas Prarie Chicken is averse to water. Should you use any water at all, be sure that it is completely unsalted. 6) Serve appropriately. Open back door, whistle, and call "Here, Spot! C' mere boy! I got something you'll enjoy, just waiting for you in your dish." |
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
|
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
|
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
Skipper wrote: wrote: Kansas Prarie Chicken: 1) Capture a Prarie Chicken. 2) Dispatch Prarie Chicken with a sharp axe. The brain of the Prarie Chicken gets so little use that it's really the bleeding out through the neck 3) Gut Prarie Chicken. This doesn't take long, as the Prarie Chicken doesn't have many guts. 4) Pluck Prarie Chicken. Don't be disappointed to discover that underneath all that proud and puffed-up plumage there really isn't a whole lot of actual bird. Those Kansas Prarie Chickens are built for show and go, but are relatively lacking in substance. 5) Cook Prarie Chicken. Roast, bake, or broil but avoid *boiling* the bird at all costs- the Kansas Prarie Chicken is averse to water. I'd bet some unscrupulous NW boat brokers are so stableblind that they couldn't even spell prairie chicken AKA pinnated grouse or prairie grouse, let alone cook it...but little doubt they'd try for all they're worth. I should have asked your advice on this. You are, after all, the undisputed expert on things having to do with dry, dusty prairies. I see that your only criticism of my post had to do with a spelling error, so undoubtedly you concur with the recipe itself.... Bert Robbins wrote: So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee. If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There are scoundrels out there. -- Skipper Along with scoundrels I'm sure there are some neophyte boat buyers who think there's something called an "exclusive agreement" between a broker and buyer. What a joke. Only in a yacht broker's fondest dreams. Of course you wouldn't be among the neophyte buyers who felt that way, as, after all, you previously wrote that you were sorry that you felt an obligation to a broker you were working with before you met me (when I was working as a broker) and that you were sure your aborted deal with the other broker would have been successfully concluded *had you* used me to represent your interests......... |
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
|
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote: wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote nonsense as usual: Hey asshole. write about boats or ****off!!! Oh boy, look who's back. :-) Tell you what, I'll follow your lead. Care to compare the number of boating posts on the NG? I thought not. Bite me asshole. The correct possessive pronoun would be "my", rather than "me". As much as it would apparently pleasure you, I'll decline this opportunity to indulge your fantasy. Trot off now and create a boating post, OK? |
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote: wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote nonsense as usual: Hey asshole. write about boats or ****off!!! Oh boy, look who's back. :-) Tell you what, I'll follow your lead. Care to compare the number of boating posts on the NG? I thought not. Bite me asshole. The correct possessive pronoun would be "my", rather than "me". As much as it would apparently pleasure you, I'll decline this opportunity to indulge your fantasy. Trot off now and create a boating post, OK? No, the actual saying is "Bite me, asshole." So why do you continue to facilitate this asshole Chuck? |
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote: wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote nonsense as usual: Hey asshole. write about boats or ****off!!! Oh boy, look who's back. :-) Tell you what, I'll follow your lead. Care to compare the number of boating posts on the NG? I thought not. Bite me asshole. The correct possessive pronoun would be "my", rather than "me". As much as it would apparently pleasure you, I'll decline this opportunity to indulge your fantasy. Trot off now and create a boating post, OK? No, the actual saying is "Bite me, asshole." So why do you continue to facilitate this asshole Chuck? Because my approval or disapproval is apparently very important to him. Notice that there are about 20 OT threads running at the present time, with the same 5-6 people piling up 150 posts or so in some of the threads. I have been comparatively inactive, yet this fine, highly educated guy decides to focus on my relatively small OT contribution. Same thing as his last sojourn here- he'll go after the liberal posters for the smallest infractions and say little or nothing to you, Skipper, NOYB, Bert, John H, Smothers and his 1000 Brothers, etc. I'll crank out a few OT posts, in his particular honor. If he wanted to clarify that "asshole" was perjorative pronoun contained within an exclamation rather than a common body part, he should have used a comma (as in your example). I have to admit I was only having a bit of fun with his corrupt structure and understood his meaning as intended. |
Just in Time for Thanksgiving (OT, humorous recipe)
wrote in message ps.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote: wrote: On 16 Nov 2005, wrote nonsense as usual: Hey asshole. write about boats or ****off!!! Oh boy, look who's back. :-) Tell you what, I'll follow your lead. Care to compare the number of boating posts on the NG? I thought not. Bite me asshole. The correct possessive pronoun would be "my", rather than "me". As much as it would apparently pleasure you, I'll decline this opportunity to indulge your fantasy. Trot off now and create a boating post, OK? No, the actual saying is "Bite me, asshole." So why do you continue to facilitate this asshole Chuck? Because my approval or disapproval is apparently very important to him. snip Why the need to continue past that Chuck other than to become defensive and become confrontational? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com