"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
I told you Fitzgerald has squat.

http://tinyurl.com/7h9rt

Fitzgerald had two years and came up with bupkus - a perjury and
obstruction indictment against one person on a case where no crime has
been committed. Apparently, it never occurred to Fitzgerald to check
with other journalists to see if they had heard of Plame and her
association with the CIA.

Fitzmas my ass.

Later,

Tom

PS: I would have emailed you on this ignoring wrecked boats, but I
didn't know if your addy was any good.

Uh...did you skip over this bit:

"The testimony, however, does not appear to shed new light on whether
Libby is guilty of lying and obstructing justice in the nearly
two-year-old probe or provide new insight into the role of senior Bush
adviser Karl Rove, who remains under investigation."

If Libby lied and obstructed, that is a federal crime. Bill Clinton was
impeached by the rabid-right US House of Representatives for lying about a
blow job.



Nope, *for lying*, period.

" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
I told you Fitzgerald has squat.

http://tinyurl.com/7h9rt

Fitzgerald had two years and came up with bupkus - a perjury and
obstruction indictment against one person on a case where no crime has
been committed. Apparently, it never occurred to Fitzgerald to check
with other journalists to see if they had heard of Plame and her
association with the CIA.

Fitzmas my ass.

Later,

Tom

PS: I would have emailed you on this ignoring wrecked boats, but I
didn't know if your addy was any good.

Uh...did you skip over this bit:

"The testimony, however, does not appear to shed new light on whether
Libby is guilty of lying and obstructing justice in the nearly
two-year-old probe or provide new insight into the role of senior Bush
adviser Karl Rove, who remains under investigation."

If Libby lied and obstructed, that is a federal crime. Bill Clinton was
impeached by the rabid-right US House of Representatives for lying about
a blow job.

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

Bert Robbins wrote:

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it
was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives
to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There
are scoundrels out there.

--
Skipper

Bert Robbins wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
I told you Fitzgerald has squat.

http://tinyurl.com/7h9rt

Fitzgerald had two years and came up with bupkus - a perjury and
obstruction indictment against one person on a case where no crime has
been committed. Apparently, it never occurred to Fitzgerald to check
with other journalists to see if they had heard of Plame and her
association with the CIA.

Fitzmas my ass.

Later,

Tom

PS: I would have emailed you on this ignoring wrecked boats, but I
didn't know if your addy was any good.

Uh...did you skip over this bit:

"The testimony, however, does not appear to shed new light on whether
Libby is guilty of lying and obstructing justice in the nearly
two-year-old probe or provide new insight into the role of senior Bush
adviser Karl Rove, who remains under investigation."

If Libby lied and obstructed, that is a federal crime. Bill Clinton was
impeached by the rabid-right US House of Representatives for lying about
a blow job.

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

Yes, depending on the conversation, of course.

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:52:41 -0600, Skipper wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it
was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives
to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There
are scoundrels out there.

I though you had stopped that?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"John H." wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it
was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives
to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There
are scoundrels out there.

I though you had stopped that?

A couple questions, John. How would you react if you had business
dealing with an unscrupulous boat dealer who then published false
stories about you to Usenet? Do you think unscrupulous boat dealers
(those with the business ethics of a used car salesman) should be
reported? Please respond honestly.

--
Skipper

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:58:17 -0600, Skipper wrote:

"John H." wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.

If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it
was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives
to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There
are scoundrels out there.

I though you had stopped that?

A couple questions, John. How would you react if you had business
dealing with an unscrupulous boat dealer who then published false
stories about you to Usenet? Do you think unscrupulous boat dealers
(those with the business ethics of a used car salesman) should be
reported? Please respond honestly.

I'd probably have vented some.

You said you were stopping. I simply reminded you. Of course, Chuck hasn't
stopped either, but I thought maybe you were going to show more class.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:51:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:52:41 -0600, Skipper wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

So, I guess that lying about a conversation is a higher crime than lying
about a actual physical sexual encounter between boss and employee.
If we were discussing a certain NW boat broker, well yes, I'd say it
was. There needs to be a certain amount of trust when giving exclusives
to these agents. If that confidence is not honored, where are we? There
are scoundrels out there.

I though you had stopped that?



Why should he when people like you facilitate him, John?
Do you ever consider the negative consequences of some of what you do here?
You are the #1 facilitator of useless souls like Skipper, Tuuk,
Smithers, et al.
Reflect upon it.

Please enlighten me. You have done so much to make this a good group that I know
you've got the right answers.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Harry Krause wrote:

A couple questions, John. How would you react if you had business
dealing with an unscrupulous boat dealer

You had no legitimate business dealings with Chuck, and he certainly is
not unscrupulous.

You're still boatless and in Dumpsterville, Kansas. Deal with that.

You still looking for a grown up boat capable of far more than a Parker:

http://www.ablboats.com/details.asp?ListingID=70642

--
Skipper

"John H." wrote:

I though you had stopped that?

A couple questions, John. How would you react if you had business
dealing with an unscrupulous boat dealer who then published false
stories about you to Usenet? Do you think unscrupulous boat dealers
(those with the business ethics of a used car salesman) should be
reported? Please respond honestly.

I'd probably have vented some.

You said you were stopping. I simply reminded you. Of course, Chuck hasn't
stopped either, but I thought maybe you were going to show more class.

I will cease! Thanks for the reminder.

--
Skipper