|
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff One day after Tom Cruise replaced his sister Lee Anne DeVette as his publicist, Ms. DeVette staged a stunning professional comeback, announcing she has joined President George W. Bush's staff as a top political advisor. It was an astonishing personal coup for Ms. DeVette, who has no political experience and whose tenure as Mr. Cruise's publicist was characterized mainly by erratic public appearances and controversial outbursts by the talkative actor. But according to one White House aide, the decision to add Ms. DeVette was a "no brainer": "Lee Ann doesn't have as much baggage as Karl does, and with our poll numbers as low as they are, we had to start thinking outside the box." On Ms. DeVette's first day on the job, Mr. Bush appeared on NBC's "Today Show," where he lectured host Matt Lauer about the evils of economics, telling him at one point, "I've done the research, and economics is not a real science." Later in the day, the president appeared on "Oprah," where he jumped up and down on host Oprah Winfrey's couch and proclaimed his love for First Lady Laura Bush while a visibly alarmed Ms. Winfrey looked on. But according to Buddy Schlantz, a veteran talent agent and longtime observer of the Hollywood scene, Ms. DeVette's work has only begun: "If those approval ratings don't go up soon, expect the president to announce that he's marrying Scarlett Johansson and she's having his baby." -- Andy Borowitz Did you send you check to Andy for ripping off his columns? |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Bill McKee wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff [snip] -- Andy Borowitz Did you send you check to Andy for ripping off his columns? Was wondering the same thing. Harry is probably the biggest copyright violator in this newsgroup. What makes his violations more agregious is that they have pointed out to him numerous times - he doesn't seem to care. Apparently copyright law does not apply to Harry. Or he assumes that all evidence is eventually erased with his x-no-archive command (which news servers are not obligated to acknowledge). |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
On 10 Nov 2005 15:51:14 -0800, "Curtis CCR" wrote:
Bill McKee wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff [snip] -- Andy Borowitz Did you send you check to Andy for ripping off his columns? Was wondering the same thing. Harry is probably the biggest copyright violator in this newsgroup. What makes his violations more agregious is that they have pointed out to him numerous times - he doesn't seem to care. Apparently copyright law does not apply to Harry. Or he assumes that all evidence is eventually erased with his x-no-archive command (which news servers are not obligated to acknowledge). Is it a copyright violation if he leaves out pertinent paragraphs (unsupportive, I mean), or adds some words, or changes some words? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so he
doesn't place any value on others intelligent property. A writer should understand copyright laws, my guess is Harry is not a writer. I would also guess he illegally downloads music and software, "Curtis CCR" wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff [snip] -- Andy Borowitz Did you send you check to Andy for ripping off his columns? Was wondering the same thing. Harry is probably the biggest copyright violator in this newsgroup. What makes his violations more agregious is that they have pointed out to him numerous times - he doesn't seem to care. Apparently copyright law does not apply to Harry. Or he assumes that all evidence is eventually erased with his x-no-archive command (which news servers are not obligated to acknowledge). |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
John H. wrote:
On 10 Nov 2005 15:51:14 -0800, "Curtis CCR" wrote: Bill McKee wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff [snip] -- Andy Borowitz Did you send you check to Andy for ripping off his columns? Was wondering the same thing. Harry is probably the biggest copyright violator in this newsgroup. What makes his violations more agregious is that they have pointed out to him numerous times - he doesn't seem to care. Apparently copyright law does not apply to Harry. Or he assumes that all evidence is eventually erased with his x-no-archive command (which news servers are not obligated to acknowledge). Is it a copyright violation if he leaves out pertinent paragraphs (unsupportive, I mean), or adds some words, or changes some words? Yes. Even though he omitted the last paragraph of the Borowitz piece, it is still a copyright violation. Posting 6 of the 7 paragraphs, or 85% of a copyrighted work without permission is not an "excerpt" and not "fair use." If he adds or changes a few words, then Harry can't attribute them to Borowitz, but by not giving the attribution, he would be engaging in good old fashioned plagerism. Basically, if Harry writes any thing about Tom Cruise's sister joining the Bush staff, he is ripping off a story from Borowitz. Harry knows how do this correctly, but I'll bet I know why he chooses to do it the way he does. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote: Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so he doesn't place any value on others intelligent property. Please show what proof you have of your above allegations. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
|
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
verificable huh? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:13:32 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? A word used by the author of the post referenced in my post. Or are you trying to make it appear as if I used the word? Figures. Was that a cut'n'paste? I didn't even notice. You didn't use the word? Was it in your post? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. He acts like a child. I am sure it is one of the reasons he is still violating copyrights by posting articles as he does to rec.boats. This was all explained to him months ago and instead of saying "You're right, I'll stop," or even just quietly ceasing the behavior, he acts as if, "Nobody is going to tell me that what I am doing is wrong. And to PROVE it, I will continue to do just what I am doing." If Harry started posting news and the opinions of others' in compliance with fair use, he probably figures he would be admitting that somebody schooled him. And nobody can teach Harry anything. Going by my recollection of posts where he talked about learning lessons, it would appear that his father is the only person Harry will admit taught him anything. Who taught him to be an asshole? :) |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Kevin,
He illegally cuts and pastes copyrighted material 10's of time a day. wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote: Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so he doesn't place any value on others intelligent property. Please show what proof you have of your above allegations. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Curtis CCR wrote:
The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. He acts like a child. I am sure it is one of the reasons he is still violating copyrights by posting articles as he does to rec.boats. This was all explained to him months ago and instead of saying "You're right, I'll stop," or even just quietly ceasing the behavior, he acts as if, "Nobody is going to tell me that what I am doing is wrong. And to PROVE it, I will continue to do just what I am doing." If Harry started posting news and the opinions of others' in compliance with fair use, he probably figures he would be admitting that somebody schooled him. And nobody can teach Harry anything. Going by my recollection of posts where he talked about learning lessons, it would appear that his father is the only person Harry will admit taught him anything. Who taught him to be an asshole? :) Very well said! -- Skipper |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. And you wonder why your kind is so reviled. To me, you seem much like the back end of a Caribou. Always going in the wrong direction and the only thing coming out is... -- Skipper |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy, explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off. Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right - Why expend the energy? |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy, explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off. Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right - Why expend the energy? What I asked was, why should I expend energy answering your whining with a long, reasoned response? Still waiting. I think the whinning everyone hears is you. "sniff sniff Why should I... sniff sniff Why should I... You're not the boss of me! sniff sniff." Forget about my calling you a child. I and others have pointed out that you violated Andy Borowitz's copyrights by distributing his article in this newsgroup without permission. There are several ways you can respond. You choose. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:51:29 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. You shouldn't. Just accept it. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:33:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
Skipper wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. And you wonder why your kind is so reviled. To me, you seem much like the back end of a Caribou. Always going in the wrong direction and the only thing coming out is... -- Skipper Tell us, Adolf...what is my "kind." Try to be specific. The kind that would make BS allegations and then whine out of presenting the (nonexistent) proof? -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
"Curtis CCR" wrote in message oups.com... Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy, explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off. Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right - Why expend the energy? What I asked was, why should I expend energy answering your whining with a long, reasoned response? Still waiting. I think the whinning everyone hears is you. "sniff sniff Why should I... sniff sniff Why should I... You're not the boss of me! sniff sniff." Forget about my calling you a child. I and others have pointed out that you violated Andy Borowitz's copyrights by distributing his article in this newsgroup without permission. There are several ways you can respond. You choose. If you keep taking his bait then he has shown he is the boss of you. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Harry,
You cut and paste in violation of copyright laws because you do not respect others intellectual property. The correct and legal way to "post an article" is to include the headline, 2 or 3 sentences, and then a link to the page of the article. That way, the owner of the article, and the publisher of the article will have the readers on their site. If you had spent time creating intellectual property you would understand why cut and pasting it is stealing from the author and publisher. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Curtis CCR wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Curtis CCR wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: verificable huh? The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo. He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults. That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response? Please tell me why. Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy, explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off. Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right - Why expend the energy? Here's a real simple answer for you, Curtis. I hope you understand it. Some weeks ago, I decided when I quoted a news article, I'd only post a handful of paragraphs, along with a comment of my one. That makes my reposting fair play. Lo and behold, half the right-wing asses here whined that I was not posting the whole article and they accused me of leaving out the good stuff. So, I post an entire article, credit it properly, and voila, half the right-wing asses whine about that. The funny thing is, two of the asses that whined when I clipped the articles are now whining about the longer versions. My conclusion: they've caught Smithers Flu. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
But at least harry reads it first to make sure it aligns with his "goose
stepping lemmings" ideology :-) "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message ... Kevin, He illegally cuts and pastes copyrighted material 10's of time a day. wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote: Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so he doesn't place any value on others intelligent property. Please show what proof you have of your above allegations. |
Tom Cruise's Sister to Join Bush Staff
Ask Kevin about Whiskey and Schnapps. ; )
No one could screw up this much by accident, he must be a Republican plant to make Democrats look like idiots. "P. Fritz" wrote in message ... But at least harry reads it first to make sure it aligns with his "goose stepping lemmings" ideology :-) "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message ... Kevin, He illegally cuts and pastes copyrighted material 10's of time a day. wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote: Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so he doesn't place any value on others intelligent property. Please show what proof you have of your above allegations. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com