"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.


Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)
progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively
monitoring, analyzing, and *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION* in the
U.S. media.

NOYB wrote:
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)
progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively
monitoring, analyzing, and *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION* in the
U.S. media.


I see. You believe that "conservatives" should be allowed... or perhaps
encouraged... to lie at will? What happened to integrity & accountability?

DSK

DSK wrote:

What happened to integrity & accountability?

Ted Kennedy and the rad left Dems.

--
Skipper

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.


Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)
progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively
monitoring, analyzing, and *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION* in the
U.S. media.

The conclusion in the opening statement of this post is debunked further in
the text. This makes no sense unless it's assumed that no-one will read the
entire article.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.

I used the cite, for one reason, to get the complete quote.

" It was widely known among those of us who cover the
intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track
down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger. So a
number of us began to pick up on that. But frankly I wasn't aware of her
actual role at the CIA and the fact that she had a covert role involving
weapons of mass destruction, not until Bob Novak wrote it."

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)
progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively
monitoring, analyzing, and *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION* in
the U.S. media.

LOL, there is a very good reason for that. In the above quote, everything
after the "But frankly", qualifies the entire statement. Now, let's try a
little experiment. Put the entire first sentence in quotes, and google
it. Notice all the right wing sites that come up, *without* the
qualifying last sentence? NewsMax, FreeRepublic, WorldNetDaily, etc.
Seems there is a need for *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION*.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.

I used the cite, for one reason, to get the complete quote.

I was still out of context because it didn't include the question that
preceded it.



" It was widely known among those of us who cover the
intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track
down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger.

What was widely known? Oh yeah..."IT" was widely known. What's "IT"?

Here's a clue: "Do we have any idea how widely known *IT* was in Washington
that
Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA?"

"IT"="that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA".


Kinda changes the meaning of her statement, eh?

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:56:17 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I was still out of context because it didn't include the question that
preceded it.

If you read back in the thread, you provided the context, vis a vis Imus.

IMUS: Apparently on October 3, 2003, you said it was "widely known" that
Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA.

Anyway, did you try my little experiment? Interesting results, aren't
they?

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:56:17 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I was still out of context because it didn't include the question that
preceded it.

If you read back in the thread, you provided the context, vis a vis Imus.

IMUS: Apparently on October 3, 2003, you said it was "widely known" that
Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA.

Anyway, did you try my little experiment? Interesting results, aren't
they?


Which experiment?

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:46:51 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Which experiment?

Disappointing, very disappointing.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:46:51 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Which experiment?

Disappointing, very disappointing.

Did I miss something?