| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:33:47 +0000, NOYB wrote:
NBC reportter Andrea Mitchell knew, but the NBC Washington Bureau chief didn't? Not likely. Christof knew. Pincus knew. Mitchell knew. Russert knew. Russert lied to the GJ about not knowing. Why would he? Besides, Russert is only a small part of the equation. A half dozen other sources have Libby knowing about Plame, before his talk with Russert. Are you saying they all lied? Actually, the White House has already been convicted by the media and public opinion. They stand more to gain than lose with this investigation. I'm not sure public opinion has convicted Libby, but it is slowly starting to indict Bush on his run-up to war. If Americans are still dying when Libby goes to trail, even if he is exonerated will be irrelevant to public opinion on Bush. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed? | General | |||
| OT LIbby rats on Cheney! | General | |||