On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.

I used the cite, for one reason, to get the complete quote.

" It was widely known among those of us who cover the
intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track
down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger. So a
number of us began to pick up on that. But frankly I wasn't aware of her
actual role at the CIA and the fact that she had a covert role involving
weapons of mass destruction, not until Bob Novak wrote it."

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3)
progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively
monitoring, analyzing, and *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION* in
the U.S. media.

LOL, there is a very good reason for that. In the above quote, everything
after the "But frankly", qualifies the entire statement. Now, let's try a
little experiment. Put the entire first sentence in quotes, and google
it. Notice all the right wing sites that come up, *without* the
qualifying last sentence? NewsMax, FreeRepublic, WorldNetDaily, etc.
Seems there is a need for *CORRECTING CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION*.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:01:52 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511090013

Please stop quoting mediamatters.org...or I'll start quoting Newsmax.

I used the cite, for one reason, to get the complete quote.

I was still out of context because it didn't include the question that
preceded it.



" It was widely known among those of us who cover the
intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track
down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger.

What was widely known? Oh yeah..."IT" was widely known. What's "IT"?

Here's a clue: "Do we have any idea how widely known *IT* was in Washington
that
Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA?"

"IT"="that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA".


Kinda changes the meaning of her statement, eh?

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:56:17 +0000, NOYB wrote:


I was still out of context because it didn't include the question that
preceded it.

If you read back in the thread, you provided the context, vis a vis Imus.

IMUS: Apparently on October 3, 2003, you said it was "widely known" that
Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA.

Anyway, did you try my little experiment? Interesting results, aren't
they?