In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:08:24 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


Obstruction for What?
Libby is charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed.

Last I checked a bj wasn't a crime.

Precisely. So what were your thoughts about Clinton's impeachment?
And
how
do they jive with your eagerness to see Libby burn for a non-crime?

Oh for ****'s sake Toothy!

Clinton lied about an embarrassing bj.

Libby lied about the outing of a CIA agent.

Libby is *accused* of lying. It hasn't been proven that Libby lied. It
easily could be Russert lying. Perhaps he heard Plame's name from people
in
the CIA (perhaps Wilson or Plame!) who were seeking to use the press to
destabilize the Bush administration? Being the loyal liberal Democrat
that
he is, he went right to the VP's office to let the CIA-led set-up begin.

That's the type of scenario that Jim Hoagland from the Washington Post
presented when he wrote:

"The hidden management of the criminal justice process AND THE NEWS MEDIA
practiced by spooks in Wilson-Rove-Libbygate is nothing short of
brilliant.

So you (Bush) were right to fear the agency. Where else do you think the
one-page
crime report that triggered the investigation and then the
pressure-building
leaks disclosing its existence came from?""


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2/AR2005110202
277_pf.html



And there was no "outing" of a CIA agent either.

You, again, prove what an uninformed pea brain you are.

Valerie Plame was working in a company that was purposefully set up to
provide cover for a handful of CIA agents. Her specialty was WMDs.

Not only was her cover blown but the cover of all her associates in that
company were blown. The outing ruined several people's careers.

That's treasonous.

Libby, Rove and Cheney should be keel hauled somewhere around where the
Republicans were going to build the bridge to nowhere. During December.

jps