Harry,
I have made many comments that have never been quoted or responded to by
anyone, yet you will bring it up when you make one of your ineffective
barbs. Your comment about filtering me is as honest as your story about
your lobster boat, your education, your wife's MD degree, and the many
stories of greatness.

Harry, you do not have the mental abilities to keep up with all of your
fictious tales, it is best if you stick to the truth, it will make your life
easier.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:18:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
Did Harry say he had you filtered? Wow!


On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:10:44 -0500, "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about
my Phd @
Diploma Mill .com wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
DSK wrote:
wrote:
....a lot of the people who got swept up by mistake and
hauled to Abu Ghraib might not have harbored a passionate hatred
for
the US before they were forced to stand naked and jack off for
the
amusement of female prison guards, etc,......but they certainly
hated
the US when they were released.
But you see, increasing the number of America's enemies only makes
us stronger. Anything less is cowardly appeasement.


Will you next suggest that we ultimately kill everybody that we
torture
so word doesn't get out? That we should operate outside the law,
and in
secret? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that the *exact*
behavior,
by Saddam Hussein, that we sacrificed thousands of dead and
wounded
Americans and $200 billion +++++ to try to stop?

Yeah, but that was him.

DSK

You fellows are getting far too Orwellian for this group. Oh, and
for Smithers' sake, that would be George Orwell, the British
author, not Orson Welles. the actor, or Martin Luther, the
anti-Semite.
I only see Smithers second-hand, as it were. He's filtered, but some
of his posts are picked up and requoted and obviously I see some of
those.
D'oh.
Seriously Harry, that feeble excuse is getting old.

Excuse? It is the way it is. I don't see any of the sh*thead's posts
directly, but only when one of them is requoted by someone else. Is that
a difficult concept for you?

Except...I didn't quote it.

WHOOOPS!

No one claimed you did.