"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
OlBlueEyes wrote:

Harry Krause wrote in
:

My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think
all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road.

Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU?

May have seen her last night...riding that broom. Don't know for sure,
they were all wearing black.

--
Skipper


Skippy's found himself another Jew-hating, black-hating soulmate. How
appropriate. And with Smithers fronting, you've got an act worthy of the
White Knights.

So add Breyer and Stephens to the list. Are you saying they are *apolitical
and middle of the road*?

Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

The real question for any SC nominee is.........will you base your decisions
on the Constitution of the United States (and Amendments) and what the
founders originally intended?

Yes, there are at times reasons for an amendment to the original
Constitution, but that is not the job of the SC.

On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, *JimH* wrote:


So add Breyer and Stephens to the list. Are you saying they are
*apolitical and middle of the road*?

Take it up with Gerald Ford, he appointed Stevens. Oh, and if you don't
like the behavior of the Supreme Court, don't vote Republican.
Republicans have appointed seven of the nine Justices.

Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

Liberal Justices? See above.

The real question for any SC nominee is.........will you base your
decisions on the Constitution of the United States (and Amendments) and
what the founders originally intended?

Cite please? How the hell do you know what the original founders intended?

Yes, there are at times reasons for an amendment to the original
Constitution, but that is not the job of the SC.

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:46:13 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:

With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely
clear from our Nation's historical practices that the Establishment Clause
permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities


http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/06/j...-on-table.html
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:46:13 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the
legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:

With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely
clear from our Nation's historical practices that the Establishment
Clause
permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned
deities


http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/06/j...-on-table.html
---------------------------

Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
...

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)


yeah i know. who needs freedom in america.

as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the
jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like
scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the
extermination of the jews.

it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

LOL.

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:37:36 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

LOL.

another yutz who doesn't know history.




---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field