BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   OT Alito a Judicial Activist (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/62197-ot-alito-judicial-activist.html)

Bob November 2nd 05 06:14 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:08:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:56:10 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:35:40 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT,
(Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

--


i dunno. the term was invented by 3rd century greek christians. so it
has a christian origin.


bob, you're the one who posted, "...he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population..."

If you are posting something he 'said', then you must have heard his
pronunciation. If you're posting something he 'wrote', then you should be able
to provide the source.

If you're simply posting garbage, I'd understand that also.


ROFLMAO!! is this what you're obsessing about, the difference between
what someone said as reported in his dissent, and what someone said
as heard???

jesus you conservatives never fail to astound...

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

Bob November 2nd 05 06:17 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote in
:

My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think
all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road.


Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU?


For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone that
doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream.

Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral.



unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

John H. November 2nd 05 06:19 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:14:10 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:08:34 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:56:10 GMT,
(Bob) wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:35:40 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT,
(Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

--

i dunno. the term was invented by 3rd century greek christians. so it
has a christian origin.


bob, you're the one who posted, "...he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population..."

If you are posting something he 'said', then you must have heard his
pronunciation. If you're posting something he 'wrote', then you should be able
to provide the source.

If you're simply posting garbage, I'd understand that also.


ROFLMAO!! is this what you're obsessing about, the difference between
what someone said as reported in his dissent, and what someone said
as heard???

jesus you conservatives never fail to astound...

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field


I'm simply asking how he pronounced 'xtians'. Is that difficult?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

[email protected] November 2nd 05 07:05 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 

NOYB wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field


How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?


LOL.


When idiots are confused and addled, they tend to laugh nervously.


NOYB November 2nd 05 08:23 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:46:13 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the
legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.


fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:

With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely
clear from our Nation's historical practices that the Establishment
Clause
permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned
deities


http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/06/j...-on-table.html
---------------------------


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)



Bill McKee November 2nd 05 08:24 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:41:18 +0000, Bill McKee wrote:


But the guy is a qualified judge.


That last statement is all that should be required. The POTUS in power
at
the time gets to nominate the judge. Ginsberg, is still an activist, but
Congress approved her nomination. As one of the Senators I heard on the
radio the other day said, it is the Presidents right to nominate, and as
long as they are qualified, they should be confirmed.


Except, the Constitution is clear on this. The President has the power,
"by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate". You wouldn't have our
Senators abrogate their Constitutional duty, would you?


But the question is: is he a qualified jurist. Not, what is their political
leaning. I hear the far left legislators, saying that the President should
select someone of their leanings, as that would be good. They did not
select someone of opposite political leanings when their POTUS nominated.



NOYB November 2nd 05 08:25 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote in
:

My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think
all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road.

Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU?


For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone that
doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream.

Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral.



unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.


If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.



P Fritz November 2nd 05 08:30 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote in
:

My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I

think
all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the

road.

Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU?

For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone

that
doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream.

Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral.



unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.


If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.


You can always spot a liebral by the "Hate America" viewpoint.
As they become more marginalized, they become more and more shrill.







Bob November 2nd 05 09:07 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
...


wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.


fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)


yeah i know. who needs freedom in america.

as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the
jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like
scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the
extermination of the jews.

it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

Bob November 2nd 05 09:08 PM

OT Alito a Judicial Activist
 
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:25:10 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message



unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.


If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.


of that i have no doubt.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com