![]() |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote: "OlBlueEyes" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote in : My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road. Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU? For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone that doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream. Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral. unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:14:10 GMT, (Bob) wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:08:34 -0500, John H. wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:56:10 GMT, (Bob) wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:35:40 -0500, John H. wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise. wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists, etc), basically are out of luck sounds like law making to me. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement? -- i dunno. the term was invented by 3rd century greek christians. so it has a christian origin. bob, you're the one who posted, "...he recently said that, since xtians make up 85% of the population..." If you are posting something he 'said', then you must have heard his pronunciation. If you're posting something he 'wrote', then you should be able to provide the source. If you're simply posting garbage, I'd understand that also. ROFLMAO!! is this what you're obsessing about, the difference between what someone said as reported in his dissent, and what someone said as heard??? jesus you conservatives never fail to astound... --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field I'm simply asking how he pronounced 'xtians'. Is that difficult? -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
NOYB wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise. wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists, etc), basically are out of luck sounds like law making to me. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement? LOL. When idiots are confused and addled, they tend to laugh nervously. |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
"Bob" wrote in message ... On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:46:13 GMT, "NOYB" wrote: "Bob" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise. wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists, etc), basically are out of luck sounds like law making to me. Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his actual words, instead of your paraphrasing. fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision: With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely clear from our Nation's historical practices that the Establishment Clause permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/06/j...-on-table.html --------------------------- Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck". However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam. But you're right... tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-) |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:41:18 +0000, Bill McKee wrote: But the guy is a qualified judge. That last statement is all that should be required. The POTUS in power at the time gets to nominate the judge. Ginsberg, is still an activist, but Congress approved her nomination. As one of the Senators I heard on the radio the other day said, it is the Presidents right to nominate, and as long as they are qualified, they should be confirmed. Except, the Constitution is clear on this. The President has the power, "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate". You wouldn't have our Senators abrogate their Constitutional duty, would you? But the question is: is he a qualified jurist. Not, what is their political leaning. I hear the far left legislators, saying that the President should select someone of their leanings, as that would be good. They did not select someone of opposite political leanings when their POTUS nominated. |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
"Bob" wrote in message ... On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz" wrote: "OlBlueEyes" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote in : My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road. Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU? For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone that doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream. Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral. unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia. If it were, we'd have cut your head off already. |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
"NOYB" wrote in message k.net... "Bob" wrote in message ... On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz" wrote: "OlBlueEyes" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote in : My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I think all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the road. Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU? For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone that doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream. Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral. unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia. If it were, we'd have cut your head off already. You can always spot a liebral by the "Hate America" viewpoint. As they become more marginalized, they become more and more shrill. |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message ... wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists, etc), basically are out of luck sounds like law making to me. Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his actual words, instead of your paraphrasing. fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision: Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck". However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam. But you're right... tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-) yeah i know. who needs freedom in america. as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the extermination of the jews. it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
OT Alito a Judicial Activist
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:25:10 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia. If it were, we'd have cut your head off already. of that i have no doubt. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com