![]() |
|
OT Homeland Security at Work
|
OT Homeland Security at Work
wrote in message oups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote: How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of Homeland Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528 grant for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who will train the firefighters on "healthy eating.'' Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has cost us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish color coding system. Fairfield where? CA Whose House District is Fairfield, CA? Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes, that it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly. Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to know who is the Rep for that District. So I looked it up. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/ A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Interesting. Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm How about that huh? What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes? No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who, oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of thing. You can't have it both ways. I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security Act, with all of it's pork loopholes? Both. |
OT Homeland Security at Work
Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote: How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of Homeland Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528 grant for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who will train the firefighters on "healthy eating.'' Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has cost us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish color coding system. Fairfield where? CA Whose House District is Fairfield, CA? Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes, that it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly. Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to know who is the Rep for that District. So I looked it up. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/ A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Interesting. Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm How about that huh? What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes? No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who, oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of thing. You can't have it both ways. I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security Act, with all of it's pork loopholes? Both. Really? Someone from both parties initiated the bill????? Who were they? |
OT Homeland Security at Work
wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote: How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of Homeland Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528 grant for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who will train the firefighters on "healthy eating.'' Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has cost us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish color coding system. Fairfield where? CA Whose House District is Fairfield, CA? Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes, that it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly. Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to know who is the Rep for that District. So I looked it up. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/ A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Interesting. Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department. http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm How about that huh? What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes? No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who, oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of thing. You can't have it both ways. I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security Act, with all of it's pork loopholes? Both. Really? Someone from both parties initiated the bill????? Who were they? Where does responsible mean initiated? Was the bill voted on party lines? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com