| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:56:35 -0500, "Bert Robbins"
wrote: There are always winners and losers in everything you do. The fact that you abhor competition and desire to seek consensus is very telling. What makes you think (wrongly) I abhor competition? Or is that synonymous with fighting to you, hm... very telling indeed... Seeking consensus is not a bad thing. You should take a modern course in negociation or google for "prisoners dilemma". It resembles co-existing a bit better tham your boxing-ring. It may enlighten you that when both parties communicate intelligently the total outcome can improve a lot. I'll try it again in even simpler terms.... In thinking in simple winning/losing you always settle for a suboptimal result. Tell me, who is winning, the intelligent negotiator who finds a mutual interest and achieves a combined succes (that would be me in this little comparison) or the boxer who knocks everything down he doesn't directly understand (and that would be you)? Or is this too much a braincracker for you...? An American, you are not! ??? Huh ? Come again ? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Observations made aboard a TomCat 255 | General | |||